助听器使用者在噪音环境下言语可理解度之计算、测量及自评比较

L. Magnusson, Mia Karlsson, A. Ringdahl, B. Israelsson
{"title":"助听器使用者在噪音环境下言语可理解度之计算、测量及自评比较","authors":"L. Magnusson, Mia Karlsson, A. Ringdahl, B. Israelsson","doi":"10.1080/010503901316914539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) was used along with paired-comparison judgements and speech recognition scores to compare the speech intelligibility provided by two hearing-aid frequency responses in two different background noises. The purpose was to validate an SII-based procedure. Test subjects were 26 hearing-aid users representing a wide range of hearing loss configurations. One hearing-aid setting was in close agreement with the NAL-R prescription, whereas the other setting was achieved by reducing the high-frequency gain by about 10 dB compared to NAL-R. There were good overall agreements between results of the three methods. Average speech recognition scores were about 4 percentage points higher for the NAL-R frequency response, which also was subjectively judged as significantly better in terms of speech intelligibility. The SII based procedure was found to be suitable for comparing hearing-aid characteristics within subjects.","PeriodicalId":76516,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian audiology","volume":"32 1","pages":"160 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503901316914539","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of calculated, measured and self-assessed intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-aid users\",\"authors\":\"L. Magnusson, Mia Karlsson, A. Ringdahl, B. Israelsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/010503901316914539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) was used along with paired-comparison judgements and speech recognition scores to compare the speech intelligibility provided by two hearing-aid frequency responses in two different background noises. The purpose was to validate an SII-based procedure. Test subjects were 26 hearing-aid users representing a wide range of hearing loss configurations. One hearing-aid setting was in close agreement with the NAL-R prescription, whereas the other setting was achieved by reducing the high-frequency gain by about 10 dB compared to NAL-R. There were good overall agreements between results of the three methods. Average speech recognition scores were about 4 percentage points higher for the NAL-R frequency response, which also was subjectively judged as significantly better in terms of speech intelligibility. The SII based procedure was found to be suitable for comparing hearing-aid characteristics within subjects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian audiology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"160 - 171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/010503901316914539\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503901316914539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/010503901316914539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

使用语音清晰度指数(SII)、配对比较判断和语音识别评分来比较两种助听器频率响应在两种不同背景噪声下提供的语音清晰度。目的是验证基于sii的程序。测试对象是26名助听器使用者,他们代表了各种听力损失情况。一种助听器设置与NAL-R处方非常一致,而另一种设置则通过与NAL-R相比减少约10 dB的高频增益来实现。三种方法的结果总体上一致性较好。NAL-R频率响应的平均语音识别分数高出约4个百分点,主观上也被认为在语音可理解性方面明显更好。基于SII的程序被发现适合于比较受试者的助听器特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of calculated, measured and self-assessed intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-aid users
The Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) was used along with paired-comparison judgements and speech recognition scores to compare the speech intelligibility provided by two hearing-aid frequency responses in two different background noises. The purpose was to validate an SII-based procedure. Test subjects were 26 hearing-aid users representing a wide range of hearing loss configurations. One hearing-aid setting was in close agreement with the NAL-R prescription, whereas the other setting was achieved by reducing the high-frequency gain by about 10 dB compared to NAL-R. There were good overall agreements between results of the three methods. Average speech recognition scores were about 4 percentage points higher for the NAL-R frequency response, which also was subjectively judged as significantly better in terms of speech intelligibility. The SII based procedure was found to be suitable for comparing hearing-aid characteristics within subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信