最不愉快概念测验:效度研究

Charles A. McAleer, R. Tipton
{"title":"最不愉快概念测验:效度研究","authors":"Charles A. McAleer, R. Tipton","doi":"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Four groups of Ss at different levels of psychological distress were asked to draw the most unpleasant thing they could think of. The resulting Unpleasant Concept drawings were rated on a six point continuum of objectivity. On the basis of these drawings, a significant difference was obtained between all groups, with the exception of one comparison.","PeriodicalId":78361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","volume":"34 1","pages":"131-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380222","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Most Unpleasant Concept Test: A Validity Study\",\"authors\":\"Charles A. McAleer, R. Tipton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Four groups of Ss at different levels of psychological distress were asked to draw the most unpleasant thing they could think of. The resulting Unpleasant Concept drawings were rated on a six point continuum of objectivity. On the basis of these drawings, a significant difference was obtained between all groups, with the exception of one comparison.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"131-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1970-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380222\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of projective techniques & personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651X.1970.10380222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

四组心理困扰程度不同的学生被要求画出他们能想到的最不愉快的事情。由此产生的不愉快的概念图被评为6点连续的客观性。在这些图的基础上,除了一个比较外,所有组之间都有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Most Unpleasant Concept Test: A Validity Study
Summary Four groups of Ss at different levels of psychological distress were asked to draw the most unpleasant thing they could think of. The resulting Unpleasant Concept drawings were rated on a six point continuum of objectivity. On the basis of these drawings, a significant difference was obtained between all groups, with the exception of one comparison.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信