Li An, Ming-Hsiang Tsou, Stephen E. S. Crook, Y. Chun, Brian H. Spitzberg, J. Gawron, D. Gupta
{"title":"时空分析:概念、定量方法和未来方向","authors":"Li An, Ming-Hsiang Tsou, Stephen E. S. Crook, Y. Chun, Brian H. Spitzberg, J. Gawron, D. Gupta","doi":"10.1080/00045608.2015.1064510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout most of human history, events and phenomena of interest have been characterized using space and time as their major characteristic dimensions, in either absolute or relative conceptualizations. Space–time analysis seeks to understand when and where (and sometimes why) things occur. In the context of several of the most recent and substantial advances in individual movement data analysis (time geography in particular) and spatial panel data analysis, we focus on quantitative space–time analytics. Based on more than 700 articles (from 1949 to 2013) we obtained through a key word search on the Web of Knowledge and through the authors' personal archives, this article provides a synthetic overview about the quantitative methodology for space–time analysis. Particularly, we highlight space–time pattern revelation (e.g., various clustering metrics, path comparison indexes, space–time tests), space–time statistical models (e.g., survival analysis, latent trajectory models), and simulation methods (e.g., cellular automaton, agent-based models) as well as their empirical applications in multiple disciplines. This article systematically presents the strengths and weaknesses of a set of prevalent methods used for space–time analysis and points to the major challenges, new opportunities, and future directions of space–time analysis.","PeriodicalId":80485,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers","volume":"105 1","pages":"891 - 914"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00045608.2015.1064510","citationCount":"82","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Space–Time Analysis: Concepts, Quantitative Methods, and Future Directions\",\"authors\":\"Li An, Ming-Hsiang Tsou, Stephen E. S. Crook, Y. Chun, Brian H. Spitzberg, J. Gawron, D. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00045608.2015.1064510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Throughout most of human history, events and phenomena of interest have been characterized using space and time as their major characteristic dimensions, in either absolute or relative conceptualizations. Space–time analysis seeks to understand when and where (and sometimes why) things occur. In the context of several of the most recent and substantial advances in individual movement data analysis (time geography in particular) and spatial panel data analysis, we focus on quantitative space–time analytics. Based on more than 700 articles (from 1949 to 2013) we obtained through a key word search on the Web of Knowledge and through the authors' personal archives, this article provides a synthetic overview about the quantitative methodology for space–time analysis. Particularly, we highlight space–time pattern revelation (e.g., various clustering metrics, path comparison indexes, space–time tests), space–time statistical models (e.g., survival analysis, latent trajectory models), and simulation methods (e.g., cellular automaton, agent-based models) as well as their empirical applications in multiple disciplines. This article systematically presents the strengths and weaknesses of a set of prevalent methods used for space–time analysis and points to the major challenges, new opportunities, and future directions of space–time analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"891 - 914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00045608.2015.1064510\",\"citationCount\":\"82\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1064510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1064510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82
摘要
在人类历史的大部分时间里,我们感兴趣的事件和现象都是用空间和时间作为它们的主要特征维度来描述的,无论是绝对的还是相对的概念。时空分析试图理解事情发生的时间和地点(有时是原因)。在个人运动数据分析(特别是时间地理)和空间面板数据分析的几个最新和实质性进展的背景下,我们专注于定量时空分析。本文以知识网络(Web of Knowledge)关键词检索所获得的700余篇文献(1949 - 2013年)和作者个人档案为基础,对时空定量分析方法进行了综合综述。特别是,我们强调时空模式揭示(例如,各种聚类指标,路径比较指标,时空测试),时空统计模型(例如,生存分析,潜在轨迹模型)和仿真方法(例如,元胞自动机,基于代理的模型)及其在多学科中的经验应用。本文系统地介绍了一套常用的时空分析方法的优缺点,并指出了时空分析的主要挑战、新的机遇和未来的发展方向。
Space–Time Analysis: Concepts, Quantitative Methods, and Future Directions
Throughout most of human history, events and phenomena of interest have been characterized using space and time as their major characteristic dimensions, in either absolute or relative conceptualizations. Space–time analysis seeks to understand when and where (and sometimes why) things occur. In the context of several of the most recent and substantial advances in individual movement data analysis (time geography in particular) and spatial panel data analysis, we focus on quantitative space–time analytics. Based on more than 700 articles (from 1949 to 2013) we obtained through a key word search on the Web of Knowledge and through the authors' personal archives, this article provides a synthetic overview about the quantitative methodology for space–time analysis. Particularly, we highlight space–time pattern revelation (e.g., various clustering metrics, path comparison indexes, space–time tests), space–time statistical models (e.g., survival analysis, latent trajectory models), and simulation methods (e.g., cellular automaton, agent-based models) as well as their empirical applications in multiple disciplines. This article systematically presents the strengths and weaknesses of a set of prevalent methods used for space–time analysis and points to the major challenges, new opportunities, and future directions of space–time analysis.