求职者的谄媚错误比比皆是:归因错误和性别偏见

IF 0.6 Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Sara Langford, T. Beehr, Nicholas R. Von Glahn
{"title":"求职者的谄媚错误比比皆是:归因错误和性别偏见","authors":"Sara Langford, T. Beehr, Nicholas R. Von Glahn","doi":"10.1037/mgr0000047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ingratiation is a common form of influence in the workplace and, in particular, in job applicants. This experiment tested whether attribution errors can be used to explain how ingratiation by applicants is perceived. Participants viewed videos of an ingratiating applicant during a job interview. Results indicate that there is evidence to support this application of the ultimate attribution error. Furthermore, ingratiation involves behaviors that are considered to be more feminine in nature; therefore, sex and femininity were also explored. Results indicate that, although more feminine participants had more favorable perceptions of ingratiation in general, female ingratiators did not benefit (via more favorable perceptions) from the match between gender and behavior expectations, as Gender Role Theory would predict.","PeriodicalId":44734,"journal":{"name":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mistakes Abound With Ingratiation in Job Applicants: Attribution Errors and Gender Bias\",\"authors\":\"Sara Langford, T. Beehr, Nicholas R. Von Glahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/mgr0000047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ingratiation is a common form of influence in the workplace and, in particular, in job applicants. This experiment tested whether attribution errors can be used to explain how ingratiation by applicants is perceived. Participants viewed videos of an ingratiating applicant during a job interview. Results indicate that there is evidence to support this application of the ultimate attribution error. Furthermore, ingratiation involves behaviors that are considered to be more feminine in nature; therefore, sex and femininity were also explored. Results indicate that, although more feminine participants had more favorable perceptions of ingratiation in general, female ingratiators did not benefit (via more favorable perceptions) from the match between gender and behavior expectations, as Gender Role Theory would predict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychologist-Manager Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychologist-Manager Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在工作场所,尤其是对求职者来说,讨好是一种常见的影响力形式。这个实验测试了归因错误是否可以用来解释申请人的讨好是如何被感知的。参与者观看了一段求职面试中讨好应聘者的视频。结果表明,有证据支持最终归因误差的应用。此外,讨好涉及的行为在本质上被认为更女性化;因此,性别和女性气质也被探讨。结果表明,尽管更多的女性参与者总体上对讨好有更有利的看法,但正如性别角色理论所预测的那样,女性讨好者并没有从性别和行为期望之间的匹配中获益(通过更有利的看法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mistakes Abound With Ingratiation in Job Applicants: Attribution Errors and Gender Bias
Ingratiation is a common form of influence in the workplace and, in particular, in job applicants. This experiment tested whether attribution errors can be used to explain how ingratiation by applicants is perceived. Participants viewed videos of an ingratiating applicant during a job interview. Results indicate that there is evidence to support this application of the ultimate attribution error. Furthermore, ingratiation involves behaviors that are considered to be more feminine in nature; therefore, sex and femininity were also explored. Results indicate that, although more feminine participants had more favorable perceptions of ingratiation in general, female ingratiators did not benefit (via more favorable perceptions) from the match between gender and behavior expectations, as Gender Role Theory would predict.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologist-Manager Journal
Psychologist-Manager Journal PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信