基于能力的招聘决策:镜头模型方法。

IF 0.6 Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Ajanta Akhuly, M. Gupta
{"title":"基于能力的招聘决策:镜头模型方法。","authors":"Ajanta Akhuly, M. Gupta","doi":"10.1037/MGR0000024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study showcases an empirical approach to delineate how competencies should be deployed for the purpose of recruitment decisions. A competencybased approach using the Brunswikian lens model was adopted to generate predictors. Three major competencies (people, individual, and business orientation) of HR incumbents were identified in an earlier study. Sixteen vignettes were designed to yield a 2 2 2 2 (High/low people High/low individual High/low business orientation Urban/rural background) completely within factorial design. These vignettes were administered to 35 HR professionals. The main effects of individual, business, & people and their 2-way interactions were significant. Cluster analysis categorized judges who have similar decision-making patterns. Comparing results of binomial logistic with ranking scores illustrates that the way interviewers actually evaluate candidates may differ from the way they believe they evaluate. Interrater reliability indicated ‘poor’ extent of agreement among judges. The results obtained have been discussed in terms of Brunswik’s Lens model.","PeriodicalId":44734,"journal":{"name":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/MGR0000024","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competency based recruitment decisions: A lens model approach.\",\"authors\":\"Ajanta Akhuly, M. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/MGR0000024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study showcases an empirical approach to delineate how competencies should be deployed for the purpose of recruitment decisions. A competencybased approach using the Brunswikian lens model was adopted to generate predictors. Three major competencies (people, individual, and business orientation) of HR incumbents were identified in an earlier study. Sixteen vignettes were designed to yield a 2 2 2 2 (High/low people High/low individual High/low business orientation Urban/rural background) completely within factorial design. These vignettes were administered to 35 HR professionals. The main effects of individual, business, & people and their 2-way interactions were significant. Cluster analysis categorized judges who have similar decision-making patterns. Comparing results of binomial logistic with ranking scores illustrates that the way interviewers actually evaluate candidates may differ from the way they believe they evaluate. Interrater reliability indicated ‘poor’ extent of agreement among judges. The results obtained have been discussed in terms of Brunswik’s Lens model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychologist-Manager Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/MGR0000024\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychologist-Manager Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/MGR0000024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologist-Manager Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/MGR0000024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究展示了一种实证方法来描述如何为招聘决策的目的部署能力。采用基于能力的方法,使用不伦斯维克透镜模型来生成预测因子。在早期的研究中,人力资源在职者的三种主要能力(人、个人和业务导向)被确定。16个小插图被设计为完全在析因设计中产生2,2,2(高/低人群高/低个体高/低商业方向城市/农村背景)。这些小插曲对35名人力资源专业人员进行了调查。个人、企业和人员及其双向交互的主要影响是显著的。聚类分析对决策模式相似的法官进行分类。二项逻辑的结果与排名分数的比较表明,面试官实际评估候选人的方式可能与他们认为自己评估的方式不同。评判员之间的信度表明,评判员之间的一致程度“很差”。所得结果已根据Brunswik的Lens模型进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competency based recruitment decisions: A lens model approach.
This study showcases an empirical approach to delineate how competencies should be deployed for the purpose of recruitment decisions. A competencybased approach using the Brunswikian lens model was adopted to generate predictors. Three major competencies (people, individual, and business orientation) of HR incumbents were identified in an earlier study. Sixteen vignettes were designed to yield a 2 2 2 2 (High/low people High/low individual High/low business orientation Urban/rural background) completely within factorial design. These vignettes were administered to 35 HR professionals. The main effects of individual, business, & people and their 2-way interactions were significant. Cluster analysis categorized judges who have similar decision-making patterns. Comparing results of binomial logistic with ranking scores illustrates that the way interviewers actually evaluate candidates may differ from the way they believe they evaluate. Interrater reliability indicated ‘poor’ extent of agreement among judges. The results obtained have been discussed in terms of Brunswik’s Lens model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychologist-Manager Journal
Psychologist-Manager Journal PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信