肌肉紧张:一种方法论行为主义的解释。

Arthur J. Marr
{"title":"肌肉紧张:一种方法论行为主义的解释。","authors":"Arthur J. Marr","doi":"10.1037/H0100677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Operant conditioning represents a unique data language that describes the lawfulness of behavior as derived from the cumulative record over time of consistent correlations between the universally observed or 'public' form or topography of behavior and its consequences. Operant conditioning procedures are based upon methodological principles, wherein reliable behavioral consistencies or 'laws' are derived using a data language that precisely maps to the universally agreed upon facts of behavior. As a form of methodological behaviorism (Pavlovian or classical conditioning is another example), the experimental methodology of operant conditioning directly measures and manipulates only publicly observable behavior. Grasping, walking, talking, etc. are operant behaviors because they are correlated with or are 'reinforced' by specific discrete outcomes. Because these behaviors uniformly engage a specific organelle of the body, namely the striated musculature, a common presumption is that operant conditioning primarily reflects the conditioning of these muscles. Of course, convulsions, startle reactions, etc. do involve the striated musculature and can be mediated by neurological rather than purely cognitive causes, but in general muscular activity is guided by its functionality as consciously perceived. It is commonly assumed that if striated muscles are activated, they are publically observed, and hence may be subsumed entire under an operant analysis. Yet only a fraction of striated muscular activity is observable publicly or privately. That is, the musculature may be activated yet not result in publicly observable responses, and neither may it be consciously or privately perceived by the individual. Ironically, the private activity of the musculature has long been made public through resolving instrumentalities (e.g., SCR, EMG) but rarely if ever has an operant analysis been employed to explain this behavior. Rather, tension has generally been construed to be an artifact of autonomic arousal that is elicited due to psycho-social 'demand'. This interpretation regards muscular tension as subsumed under different motivational principles that do not incorporate contingency, such as the reflexive or S-R responses entailed by a fight or flight response, stress reaction, etc. (Marmot & Wilkinson, 2006). In this case, inferred mediating processes take the place of observed correlations between behavior and environmental events. However, this conclusion may remain uncontested not because the relationship between tension and its governing contingencies is disproven, or because the relevant data are unobtainable, but because of a common misinterpretation of the semantics of 'demand'. The purpose of this article is to argue that the same data and data language used to establish the concept that tension is reflexive or is a respondent can be reinterpreted to unequivocally demonstrate that muscular tension is an instrumental or operant behavior. The Striated Musculature Although the activity of the striated musculature comprises the majority of behavior as we understand it, its psychophysiology is not widely known. Muscle fibers are categorized into \"slow-twitch fibers\" and \"fast-twitch fibers\" (Squire, McConnell, & Zigmund, 2003). Slow-twitch fibers (also called \"Type 1 muscle fibers\") activate and deactivate slowly, but when activated they are also very slow to fatigue. Fast-twitch fibers activate and deactivate rapidly and come in two types: \"Type 2A muscle fibers\" which fatigue at an intermediate rate, and \"Type 2B muscle fibers\" which fatigue rapidly. These three muscle fiber types (Types 1, 2A, and 2B) are contained in all muscles in varying amounts. Muscles that need to be activated much of the time (like postural muscles) have a greater number of Type 1 (slow) fibers. When a muscle begins to contract, primarily Type 1 fibers are activated first, followed by Type 2A, then 2B. Type 1 fibers are often monotonically activated because of psychosocial 'demand' that in general does not engage fast twitch fibers. …","PeriodicalId":88717,"journal":{"name":"The behavior analyst today","volume":"35 1","pages":"364-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muscular tension: An explanation from a methodological behaviorism.\",\"authors\":\"Arthur J. Marr\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/H0100677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Operant conditioning represents a unique data language that describes the lawfulness of behavior as derived from the cumulative record over time of consistent correlations between the universally observed or 'public' form or topography of behavior and its consequences. Operant conditioning procedures are based upon methodological principles, wherein reliable behavioral consistencies or 'laws' are derived using a data language that precisely maps to the universally agreed upon facts of behavior. As a form of methodological behaviorism (Pavlovian or classical conditioning is another example), the experimental methodology of operant conditioning directly measures and manipulates only publicly observable behavior. Grasping, walking, talking, etc. are operant behaviors because they are correlated with or are 'reinforced' by specific discrete outcomes. Because these behaviors uniformly engage a specific organelle of the body, namely the striated musculature, a common presumption is that operant conditioning primarily reflects the conditioning of these muscles. Of course, convulsions, startle reactions, etc. do involve the striated musculature and can be mediated by neurological rather than purely cognitive causes, but in general muscular activity is guided by its functionality as consciously perceived. It is commonly assumed that if striated muscles are activated, they are publically observed, and hence may be subsumed entire under an operant analysis. Yet only a fraction of striated muscular activity is observable publicly or privately. That is, the musculature may be activated yet not result in publicly observable responses, and neither may it be consciously or privately perceived by the individual. Ironically, the private activity of the musculature has long been made public through resolving instrumentalities (e.g., SCR, EMG) but rarely if ever has an operant analysis been employed to explain this behavior. Rather, tension has generally been construed to be an artifact of autonomic arousal that is elicited due to psycho-social 'demand'. This interpretation regards muscular tension as subsumed under different motivational principles that do not incorporate contingency, such as the reflexive or S-R responses entailed by a fight or flight response, stress reaction, etc. (Marmot & Wilkinson, 2006). In this case, inferred mediating processes take the place of observed correlations between behavior and environmental events. However, this conclusion may remain uncontested not because the relationship between tension and its governing contingencies is disproven, or because the relevant data are unobtainable, but because of a common misinterpretation of the semantics of 'demand'. The purpose of this article is to argue that the same data and data language used to establish the concept that tension is reflexive or is a respondent can be reinterpreted to unequivocally demonstrate that muscular tension is an instrumental or operant behavior. The Striated Musculature Although the activity of the striated musculature comprises the majority of behavior as we understand it, its psychophysiology is not widely known. Muscle fibers are categorized into \\\"slow-twitch fibers\\\" and \\\"fast-twitch fibers\\\" (Squire, McConnell, & Zigmund, 2003). Slow-twitch fibers (also called \\\"Type 1 muscle fibers\\\") activate and deactivate slowly, but when activated they are also very slow to fatigue. Fast-twitch fibers activate and deactivate rapidly and come in two types: \\\"Type 2A muscle fibers\\\" which fatigue at an intermediate rate, and \\\"Type 2B muscle fibers\\\" which fatigue rapidly. These three muscle fiber types (Types 1, 2A, and 2B) are contained in all muscles in varying amounts. Muscles that need to be activated much of the time (like postural muscles) have a greater number of Type 1 (slow) fibers. When a muscle begins to contract, primarily Type 1 fibers are activated first, followed by Type 2A, then 2B. Type 1 fibers are often monotonically activated because of psychosocial 'demand' that in general does not engage fast twitch fibers. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":88717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The behavior analyst today\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"364-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The behavior analyst today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100677\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The behavior analyst today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0100677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

操作性条件反射代表了一种独特的数据语言,它描述了行为的合法性,这种合法性来源于长期累积的记录,这些记录是普遍观察到的或“公共”形式或行为地形与其后果之间一致的相关性。操作性条件反射程序建立在方法论原则的基础上,其中可靠的行为一致性或“规律”是使用一种精确映射到普遍同意的行为事实的数据语言得出的。作为方法行为主义的一种形式(巴甫洛夫条件反射或经典条件反射是另一个例子),操作性条件反射的实验方法直接测量和操纵公众可观察到的行为。抓握、走路、说话等都是操作性行为,因为它们与特定的离散结果相关或被“强化”。因为这些行为一致地涉及身体的特定细胞器,即横纹肌,一种普遍的假设是操作性条件反射主要反映了这些肌肉的条件反射。当然,抽搐、惊吓反应等确实与横纹肌有关,可以由神经而非纯粹的认知原因介导,但一般来说,肌肉活动是由其有意识感知的功能引导的。通常认为,如果横纹肌被激活,它们是公开观察到的,因此可以将其纳入操作性分析。然而,只有一小部分横纹肌活动是公开或私下可以观察到的。也就是说,肌肉组织可能被激活,但不会导致公开可观察到的反应,也不会被个人有意识或私下感知到。具有讽刺意味的是,长期以来,肌肉组织的私人活动一直通过分析工具(例如SCR, EMG)被公开,但很少有有效的分析被用来解释这种行为。相反,紧张通常被解释为由于心理社会“需求”而引起的自主觉醒的产物。这种解释认为肌肉紧张属于不同的动机原则,这些原则不包括偶然性,例如由战斗或逃跑反应、压力反应等引起的反射或S-R反应(Marmot & Wilkinson, 2006)。在这种情况下,推断的中介过程取代了观察到的行为与环境事件之间的相关性。然而,这一结论可能仍然没有争议,不是因为张力与其控制的偶然事件之间的关系被证明是错误的,也不是因为相关数据无法获得,而是因为对“需求”语义的普遍误解。这篇文章的目的是论证,同样的数据和数据语言用来建立张力是反射性的概念,可以被重新解释,以明确地证明肌肉张力是一种工具性或操作性行为。虽然横纹肌组织的活动构成了我们所了解的大部分行为,但其心理生理学并不广为人知。肌纤维分为“慢肌纤维”和“快肌纤维”(Squire, McConnell, & Zigmund, 2003)。慢肌纤维(也称为“1型肌纤维”)激活和失活缓慢,但当激活时,它们也非常缓慢地疲劳。快肌纤维的激活和失活速度很快,分为两类:疲劳速度中等的“2A型”肌纤维和快速疲劳的“2B型”肌纤维。这三种肌纤维类型(类型1,2A和2B)以不同的数量存在于所有肌肉中。需要经常被激活的肌肉(如体位肌)有更多的1型(慢)纤维。当肌肉开始收缩时,主要是1型纤维首先被激活,其次是2A型,然后是2B型。1型纤维通常是单调激活的,因为社会心理“需求”通常不参与快速抽搐纤维。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Muscular tension: An explanation from a methodological behaviorism.
Operant conditioning represents a unique data language that describes the lawfulness of behavior as derived from the cumulative record over time of consistent correlations between the universally observed or 'public' form or topography of behavior and its consequences. Operant conditioning procedures are based upon methodological principles, wherein reliable behavioral consistencies or 'laws' are derived using a data language that precisely maps to the universally agreed upon facts of behavior. As a form of methodological behaviorism (Pavlovian or classical conditioning is another example), the experimental methodology of operant conditioning directly measures and manipulates only publicly observable behavior. Grasping, walking, talking, etc. are operant behaviors because they are correlated with or are 'reinforced' by specific discrete outcomes. Because these behaviors uniformly engage a specific organelle of the body, namely the striated musculature, a common presumption is that operant conditioning primarily reflects the conditioning of these muscles. Of course, convulsions, startle reactions, etc. do involve the striated musculature and can be mediated by neurological rather than purely cognitive causes, but in general muscular activity is guided by its functionality as consciously perceived. It is commonly assumed that if striated muscles are activated, they are publically observed, and hence may be subsumed entire under an operant analysis. Yet only a fraction of striated muscular activity is observable publicly or privately. That is, the musculature may be activated yet not result in publicly observable responses, and neither may it be consciously or privately perceived by the individual. Ironically, the private activity of the musculature has long been made public through resolving instrumentalities (e.g., SCR, EMG) but rarely if ever has an operant analysis been employed to explain this behavior. Rather, tension has generally been construed to be an artifact of autonomic arousal that is elicited due to psycho-social 'demand'. This interpretation regards muscular tension as subsumed under different motivational principles that do not incorporate contingency, such as the reflexive or S-R responses entailed by a fight or flight response, stress reaction, etc. (Marmot & Wilkinson, 2006). In this case, inferred mediating processes take the place of observed correlations between behavior and environmental events. However, this conclusion may remain uncontested not because the relationship between tension and its governing contingencies is disproven, or because the relevant data are unobtainable, but because of a common misinterpretation of the semantics of 'demand'. The purpose of this article is to argue that the same data and data language used to establish the concept that tension is reflexive or is a respondent can be reinterpreted to unequivocally demonstrate that muscular tension is an instrumental or operant behavior. The Striated Musculature Although the activity of the striated musculature comprises the majority of behavior as we understand it, its psychophysiology is not widely known. Muscle fibers are categorized into "slow-twitch fibers" and "fast-twitch fibers" (Squire, McConnell, & Zigmund, 2003). Slow-twitch fibers (also called "Type 1 muscle fibers") activate and deactivate slowly, but when activated they are also very slow to fatigue. Fast-twitch fibers activate and deactivate rapidly and come in two types: "Type 2A muscle fibers" which fatigue at an intermediate rate, and "Type 2B muscle fibers" which fatigue rapidly. These three muscle fiber types (Types 1, 2A, and 2B) are contained in all muscles in varying amounts. Muscles that need to be activated much of the time (like postural muscles) have a greater number of Type 1 (slow) fibers. When a muscle begins to contract, primarily Type 1 fibers are activated first, followed by Type 2A, then 2B. Type 1 fibers are often monotonically activated because of psychosocial 'demand' that in general does not engage fast twitch fibers. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信