局限性前列腺癌患者的决策策略。

M. Diefenbach, Jenevie Dorsey, R. Uzzo, G. Hanks, R. Greenberg, E. Horwitz, Fredrick Newton, P. Engstrom
{"title":"局限性前列腺癌患者的决策策略。","authors":"M. Diefenbach, Jenevie Dorsey, R. Uzzo, G. Hanks, R. Greenberg, E. Horwitz, Fredrick Newton, P. Engstrom","doi":"10.1053/SURO.2002.30399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer not only have to cope with the impact of the cancer diagnosis, but also need to interpret complicated medical information to make an informed treatment decision. We report initial results from an ongoing longitudinal investigation examining treatment decision making among men diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer. Men (N = 654) were recruited into the assessment study after an initial treatment consultation with a urologic surgeon or radiation oncologist. Patients were, on average, 66 years old, married (85%), had at least a high school education (45%), were retired (58%), and were Caucasian (91%) or African American (7%). Guided by a cognitive-affective theoretical framework, we assessed treatment and disease-relevant beliefs and affects in addition to clinical variables. The majority of patients decided on external beam radiation therapy (52%), followed by brachytherapy (25%), prostatectomy (17%), and watchful waiting (6%). Patients who decided on prostatectomy were significantly younger (mean age, 58 yr) than patients who received radiation therapy (mean age, 67 yr) and brachytherapy (mean age, 66 yr). When asked for the most important reason influencing their treatment decision, patients indicated physician recommendation (51%), advice from friends and family (19%), information obtained from books and journals (18%), or the Internet (7%). Among cognitive variables, patients who decided on surgery perceived prostate cancer as being significantly more serious (P <.001), and had greater difficulties in making a treatment decision (P <.005) compared with patients receiving radiation therapy or brachytherapy. Surgical patients were also more distressed about their treatment decision (P <.001) and concerned that the cancer might spread (P <.005). To date, patients followed-up after treatment have not indicated significant regrets about their therapeutic choice. These data suggest that unique treatment-related beliefs and affects need to be taken into account during the treatment counseling process. Implications for the development of decision aids are discussed.","PeriodicalId":79436,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in urologic oncology","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"55-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"144","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer.\",\"authors\":\"M. Diefenbach, Jenevie Dorsey, R. Uzzo, G. Hanks, R. Greenberg, E. Horwitz, Fredrick Newton, P. Engstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/SURO.2002.30399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer not only have to cope with the impact of the cancer diagnosis, but also need to interpret complicated medical information to make an informed treatment decision. We report initial results from an ongoing longitudinal investigation examining treatment decision making among men diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer. Men (N = 654) were recruited into the assessment study after an initial treatment consultation with a urologic surgeon or radiation oncologist. Patients were, on average, 66 years old, married (85%), had at least a high school education (45%), were retired (58%), and were Caucasian (91%) or African American (7%). Guided by a cognitive-affective theoretical framework, we assessed treatment and disease-relevant beliefs and affects in addition to clinical variables. The majority of patients decided on external beam radiation therapy (52%), followed by brachytherapy (25%), prostatectomy (17%), and watchful waiting (6%). Patients who decided on prostatectomy were significantly younger (mean age, 58 yr) than patients who received radiation therapy (mean age, 67 yr) and brachytherapy (mean age, 66 yr). When asked for the most important reason influencing their treatment decision, patients indicated physician recommendation (51%), advice from friends and family (19%), information obtained from books and journals (18%), or the Internet (7%). Among cognitive variables, patients who decided on surgery perceived prostate cancer as being significantly more serious (P <.001), and had greater difficulties in making a treatment decision (P <.005) compared with patients receiving radiation therapy or brachytherapy. Surgical patients were also more distressed about their treatment decision (P <.001) and concerned that the cancer might spread (P <.005). To date, patients followed-up after treatment have not indicated significant regrets about their therapeutic choice. These data suggest that unique treatment-related beliefs and affects need to be taken into account during the treatment counseling process. Implications for the development of decision aids are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in urologic oncology\",\"volume\":\"20 1 1\",\"pages\":\"55-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"144\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in urologic oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/SURO.2002.30399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in urologic oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/SURO.2002.30399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 144

摘要

诊断为早期前列腺癌的患者不仅需要应对癌症诊断的影响,还需要解释复杂的医学信息以做出明智的治疗决策。我们报告了一项正在进行的纵向调查的初步结果,该调查检查了诊断为早期前列腺癌的男性的治疗决策。男性(N = 654)在与泌尿外科医生或放射肿瘤学家进行初步治疗咨询后被招募到评估研究中。患者平均年龄66岁,已婚(85%),至少受过高中教育(45%),退休(58%),白种人(91%)或非洲裔美国人(7%)。在认知-情感理论框架的指导下,我们评估了治疗和疾病相关的信念和影响,以及临床变量。大多数患者选择外束放射治疗(52%),其次是近距离放疗(25%),前列腺切除术(17%)和观察等待(6%)。决定行前列腺切除术的患者明显比接受放射治疗(平均年龄67岁)和近距离放疗(平均年龄66岁)的患者年轻(平均年龄58岁)。当被问及影响其治疗决定的最重要原因时,患者表示医生建议(51%),朋友和家人的建议(19%),从书籍和期刊中获得的信息(18%)或互联网(7%)。在认知变量中,与接受放射治疗或近距离放射治疗的患者相比,决定手术的患者对前列腺癌的认知明显更严重(P < 0.001),并且在做出治疗决定时更困难(P < 0.005)。手术患者对自己的治疗决定也更焦虑(P < 0.001),担心癌症可能扩散(P < 0.005)。迄今为止,治疗后随访的患者没有对他们的治疗选择表示重大遗憾。这些数据表明,在治疗咨询过程中,需要考虑到与治疗相关的独特信念和影响。讨论了发展决策辅助工具的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer.
Patients diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer not only have to cope with the impact of the cancer diagnosis, but also need to interpret complicated medical information to make an informed treatment decision. We report initial results from an ongoing longitudinal investigation examining treatment decision making among men diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer. Men (N = 654) were recruited into the assessment study after an initial treatment consultation with a urologic surgeon or radiation oncologist. Patients were, on average, 66 years old, married (85%), had at least a high school education (45%), were retired (58%), and were Caucasian (91%) or African American (7%). Guided by a cognitive-affective theoretical framework, we assessed treatment and disease-relevant beliefs and affects in addition to clinical variables. The majority of patients decided on external beam radiation therapy (52%), followed by brachytherapy (25%), prostatectomy (17%), and watchful waiting (6%). Patients who decided on prostatectomy were significantly younger (mean age, 58 yr) than patients who received radiation therapy (mean age, 67 yr) and brachytherapy (mean age, 66 yr). When asked for the most important reason influencing their treatment decision, patients indicated physician recommendation (51%), advice from friends and family (19%), information obtained from books and journals (18%), or the Internet (7%). Among cognitive variables, patients who decided on surgery perceived prostate cancer as being significantly more serious (P <.001), and had greater difficulties in making a treatment decision (P <.005) compared with patients receiving radiation therapy or brachytherapy. Surgical patients were also more distressed about their treatment decision (P <.001) and concerned that the cancer might spread (P <.005). To date, patients followed-up after treatment have not indicated significant regrets about their therapeutic choice. These data suggest that unique treatment-related beliefs and affects need to be taken into account during the treatment counseling process. Implications for the development of decision aids are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信