战场区域麻醉:演变与未来概念

Michael L. Kent MD , Chester C. Buckenmaier III MD
{"title":"战场区域麻醉:演变与未来概念","authors":"Michael L. Kent MD ,&nbsp;Chester C. Buckenmaier III MD","doi":"10.1053/j.trap.2013.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Owing to advanced protective technologies, many servicemembers are returning home with injuries that proved fatal in previous conflicts. However, such severe injuries provide numerous challenges for acute pain physicians. Advanced regional anesthetic techniques provide an essential multimodal tool that optimizes pain and minimizes opioid use. Utilization of such techniques in current conflicts has progressed from a rare occurrence owing to limited equipment and personnel to a widely use array of techniques utilized on the battlefield and continued throughout transport stateside. Such an evolution has enhanced the development of acute pain medicine services within the military that deliver such techniques along with noninterventional techniques. Further, such acute pain medicine services are well received in a combat theater and may serve as an optimal model in future conflicts. Preliminary experience within the last decade has described the interplay of such techniques with </span>anticoagulation<span><span><span> regimens in such trauma patients, incidence of infection, levels of serum local anesthetics </span>in patients with multiple catheters, and the utility of such techniques in patients who may be at risk for </span>compartment syndrome but must bear with a long transport chain back home. Looking forward, future training of personnel and tracking of outcomes are essential in optimizing the utility of such techniques in forward environments, but the collection of accurate outcome data will also determine if prolonged benefits can be realized in addition to the obvious benefit downrange.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":93817,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in regional anesthesia & pain management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.trap.2013.08.004","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Battlefield regional anesthesia: Evolution and future concepts\",\"authors\":\"Michael L. Kent MD ,&nbsp;Chester C. Buckenmaier III MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.trap.2013.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Owing to advanced protective technologies, many servicemembers are returning home with injuries that proved fatal in previous conflicts. However, such severe injuries provide numerous challenges for acute pain physicians. Advanced regional anesthetic techniques provide an essential multimodal tool that optimizes pain and minimizes opioid use. Utilization of such techniques in current conflicts has progressed from a rare occurrence owing to limited equipment and personnel to a widely use array of techniques utilized on the battlefield and continued throughout transport stateside. Such an evolution has enhanced the development of acute pain medicine services within the military that deliver such techniques along with noninterventional techniques. Further, such acute pain medicine services are well received in a combat theater and may serve as an optimal model in future conflicts. Preliminary experience within the last decade has described the interplay of such techniques with </span>anticoagulation<span><span><span> regimens in such trauma patients, incidence of infection, levels of serum local anesthetics </span>in patients with multiple catheters, and the utility of such techniques in patients who may be at risk for </span>compartment syndrome but must bear with a long transport chain back home. Looking forward, future training of personnel and tracking of outcomes are essential in optimizing the utility of such techniques in forward environments, but the collection of accurate outcome data will also determine if prolonged benefits can be realized in addition to the obvious benefit downrange.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in regional anesthesia & pain management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.trap.2013.08.004\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in regional anesthesia & pain management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084208X13000591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in regional anesthesia & pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084208X13000591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

由于有了先进的防护技术,许多军人带着在以前的冲突中被证明是致命的伤返回家园。然而,这种严重的伤害为急性疼痛医生提供了许多挑战。先进的区域麻醉技术提供了一种重要的多模式工具,可以优化疼痛并最大限度地减少阿片类药物的使用。在当前的冲突中,由于设备和人员有限,这种技术的使用已经从很少发生,发展到广泛使用战场上使用的一系列技术,并在美国境内的整个运输过程中继续使用。这样的进化促进了军队中急性疼痛药物服务的发展,这些服务提供了这些技术以及非介入性技术。此外,这种急性疼痛药物服务在战区很受欢迎,可能成为未来冲突的最佳模式。过去十年的初步经验描述了此类技术与此类创伤患者抗凝治疗方案的相互作用,感染的发生率,多导管患者血清局部麻醉剂的水平,以及此类技术在可能存在隔室综合征风险但必须承受长运输链回家的患者中的应用。展望未来,未来的人员培训和结果跟踪对于优化这些技术在未来环境中的效用至关重要,但准确的结果数据的收集也将决定除了明显的下行效益外,是否可以实现长期效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Battlefield regional anesthesia: Evolution and future concepts

Owing to advanced protective technologies, many servicemembers are returning home with injuries that proved fatal in previous conflicts. However, such severe injuries provide numerous challenges for acute pain physicians. Advanced regional anesthetic techniques provide an essential multimodal tool that optimizes pain and minimizes opioid use. Utilization of such techniques in current conflicts has progressed from a rare occurrence owing to limited equipment and personnel to a widely use array of techniques utilized on the battlefield and continued throughout transport stateside. Such an evolution has enhanced the development of acute pain medicine services within the military that deliver such techniques along with noninterventional techniques. Further, such acute pain medicine services are well received in a combat theater and may serve as an optimal model in future conflicts. Preliminary experience within the last decade has described the interplay of such techniques with anticoagulation regimens in such trauma patients, incidence of infection, levels of serum local anesthetics in patients with multiple catheters, and the utility of such techniques in patients who may be at risk for compartment syndrome but must bear with a long transport chain back home. Looking forward, future training of personnel and tracking of outcomes are essential in optimizing the utility of such techniques in forward environments, but the collection of accurate outcome data will also determine if prolonged benefits can be realized in addition to the obvious benefit downrange.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信