提高大学生群体特权意识。

Rose M. Stark-Rose, Jayne M. Lokken, F. Zarghami
{"title":"提高大学生群体特权意识。","authors":"Rose M. Stark-Rose, Jayne M. Lokken, F. Zarghami","doi":"10.1037/e605172009-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A qualitative study was conducted with 850 participants in 36 different classes including Child and Family Studies, Human Relations, Aviation, and Community Studies in a university in the Midwest. The study conducted was based on a simulated discrimination exercise to increase awareness of group privilege and preferential treatment among college students. Based on the reviewing and coding of the participants' reflections, the following five major themes were identified: awareness of differential application of rules based on group identity; the emotional impact of being treated unfairly; the effect of a person in power's nonverbal and verbal behavior on participants; individual reactions within and between groups; and what makes it hard to talk about race. ********** When asked about their racial views members of the dominant group endorse abstract principles of racial equality and fairness yet continue to oppose pragmatic initiatives and programs to reduce racial inequality (Schuman, Steeh, Bobo, & Krysan, 1997; Sears, Hetts, Sidanius, & Bobo, 2000; Bonilla-Silva & Forman, 2000). Many dominant group members also do not consider themselves prejudiced, but hold negative racial stereotypes, have feelings of resentment and dislike towards minorities, deny the existence of racial prejudice and discrimination, attribute lack of minority economic gains to a lack of hard work, and believe intervening programs have unfairly advantaged minority groups at the expense of the those in the dominant group (Henry & Sears, 2002; Sears & Henry, 2003). This belief system reflects what social science scholars have termed modern racism (McConahay, Hardee, & Batts, 1981). While old-fashioned racism, overt racist practices and the belief in the biological inferiority of Blacks, continues to exist, modern racism reflects the apparent contradiction between endorsement of racial equality, the rejection of policies to bring about racial equality, and prejudice attitudes; culminating in economic, social, educational, and political adverse consequences for minority groups (Kinder & Sears, 1981; Feagin & Sikes, 1994; Dovidio & Gaertner, 1986; Feagin & McKinney, 2003; McConahay & Hough, 1976). An important factor embedded within the notion of modern racism is the influence of group privilege on the racial positions of those in the dominant group. Group privilege is the unearned advantage conferred to the dominant group; unearned because advantages are obtained not by ability or effort but rather by solely being a member of a privileged group (Johnson, 2006; McIntosh, 1989; Whitley & Kite, 2006). A consequence of group privilege is it is often self perpetuating because the unearned advantages are often oblivious to those that hold them (Johnson, 2006; McIntosh, 1989), which helps maintain systems of privilege and advantages for members of the dominant group (Johnson, 2006). Another consequence of group privilege is prejudical attitudes, discrimination or undeserved negative treatment occurs against members of a minority group (Dovidio & Gaertner, 1986), which can take many forms; from avoidance, exclusion, to outright rejection (Johnson, 2006; Feagin & McKinney, 2003). What culminates from group privilege is a culture of inequality- \"the disadvantages of experiencing prejudice and discrimination and the advantages of unearned privilege\" (Whitley & Kite, 2006, p. 15). Colleges nationwide have been increasing their diversity initiatives through infusing multicultural content within individual course curricula, or requiring a diversity course(s) to satisfy graduation requirements (Nesbitt, 2004; Greens, 2000; Humphrey, 2000). Diversity education programs aim to not only prepare students for an understanding of and appreciation for diversity within the broader society, but also to stimulate critical thinking about issues such as racism, prejudice, oppression, privilege, and discrimination (Abrams & Gibson, 2007; Garcia & Melendez, 1997; Benjamin & Schwartz, 1995; and Lyons-Lawrence, 1994). …","PeriodicalId":84466,"journal":{"name":"College student journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"537-546"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing Awareness of Group Privilege with College Students.\",\"authors\":\"Rose M. Stark-Rose, Jayne M. Lokken, F. Zarghami\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e605172009-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A qualitative study was conducted with 850 participants in 36 different classes including Child and Family Studies, Human Relations, Aviation, and Community Studies in a university in the Midwest. The study conducted was based on a simulated discrimination exercise to increase awareness of group privilege and preferential treatment among college students. Based on the reviewing and coding of the participants' reflections, the following five major themes were identified: awareness of differential application of rules based on group identity; the emotional impact of being treated unfairly; the effect of a person in power's nonverbal and verbal behavior on participants; individual reactions within and between groups; and what makes it hard to talk about race. ********** When asked about their racial views members of the dominant group endorse abstract principles of racial equality and fairness yet continue to oppose pragmatic initiatives and programs to reduce racial inequality (Schuman, Steeh, Bobo, & Krysan, 1997; Sears, Hetts, Sidanius, & Bobo, 2000; Bonilla-Silva & Forman, 2000). Many dominant group members also do not consider themselves prejudiced, but hold negative racial stereotypes, have feelings of resentment and dislike towards minorities, deny the existence of racial prejudice and discrimination, attribute lack of minority economic gains to a lack of hard work, and believe intervening programs have unfairly advantaged minority groups at the expense of the those in the dominant group (Henry & Sears, 2002; Sears & Henry, 2003). This belief system reflects what social science scholars have termed modern racism (McConahay, Hardee, & Batts, 1981). While old-fashioned racism, overt racist practices and the belief in the biological inferiority of Blacks, continues to exist, modern racism reflects the apparent contradiction between endorsement of racial equality, the rejection of policies to bring about racial equality, and prejudice attitudes; culminating in economic, social, educational, and political adverse consequences for minority groups (Kinder & Sears, 1981; Feagin & Sikes, 1994; Dovidio & Gaertner, 1986; Feagin & McKinney, 2003; McConahay & Hough, 1976). An important factor embedded within the notion of modern racism is the influence of group privilege on the racial positions of those in the dominant group. Group privilege is the unearned advantage conferred to the dominant group; unearned because advantages are obtained not by ability or effort but rather by solely being a member of a privileged group (Johnson, 2006; McIntosh, 1989; Whitley & Kite, 2006). A consequence of group privilege is it is often self perpetuating because the unearned advantages are often oblivious to those that hold them (Johnson, 2006; McIntosh, 1989), which helps maintain systems of privilege and advantages for members of the dominant group (Johnson, 2006). Another consequence of group privilege is prejudical attitudes, discrimination or undeserved negative treatment occurs against members of a minority group (Dovidio & Gaertner, 1986), which can take many forms; from avoidance, exclusion, to outright rejection (Johnson, 2006; Feagin & McKinney, 2003). What culminates from group privilege is a culture of inequality- \\\"the disadvantages of experiencing prejudice and discrimination and the advantages of unearned privilege\\\" (Whitley & Kite, 2006, p. 15). Colleges nationwide have been increasing their diversity initiatives through infusing multicultural content within individual course curricula, or requiring a diversity course(s) to satisfy graduation requirements (Nesbitt, 2004; Greens, 2000; Humphrey, 2000). Diversity education programs aim to not only prepare students for an understanding of and appreciation for diversity within the broader society, but also to stimulate critical thinking about issues such as racism, prejudice, oppression, privilege, and discrimination (Abrams & Gibson, 2007; Garcia & Melendez, 1997; Benjamin & Schwartz, 1995; and Lyons-Lawrence, 1994). …\",\"PeriodicalId\":84466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"College student journal\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"537-546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"College student journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e605172009-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College student journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e605172009-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在美国中西部的一所大学,对儿童与家庭学、人际关系学、航空学、社区学等36个学科的850名学生进行了定性研究。这项研究是在模拟歧视的基础上进行的,目的是提高大学生对群体特权和优待的意识。基于对参与者反思的回顾和编码,确定了以下五个主要主题:基于群体认同的规则差异应用意识;受到不公平对待的情感影响;掌权者的非语言和语言行为对参与者的影响;群体内部和群体之间的个体反应;是什么让我们难以谈论种族。**********当被问及他们的种族观点时,占主导地位的群体成员支持种族平等和公平的抽象原则,但继续反对减少种族不平等的务实举措和计划(Schuman, Steeh, Bobo, & Krysan, 1997;Sears, Hetts, Sidanius, & Bobo, 2000;Bonilla-Silva & Forman, 2000)。许多优势群体成员也不认为自己有偏见,但持有消极的种族刻板印象,对少数群体有怨恨和厌恶的感觉,否认种族偏见和歧视的存在,将少数群体缺乏经济收益归因于缺乏努力工作,并认为干预计划以牺牲优势群体的利益为代价,使少数群体获得了不公平的优势(Henry & Sears, 2002;西尔斯和亨利,2003)。这种信仰体系反映了社会科学学者所称的现代种族主义(McConahay, Hardee, & Batts, 1981)。虽然老式的种族主义,公开的种族主义做法和认为黑人在生物学上低人一等的信念继续存在,但现代种族主义反映了支持种族平等、拒绝实现种族平等的政策和偏见态度之间的明显矛盾;最终对少数群体造成经济、社会、教育和政治上的不利后果(Kinder & Sears, 1981;Feagin & Sikes, 1994;Dovidio & Gaertner, 1986;Feagin & McKinney, 2003;McConahay & Hough, 1976)。现代种族主义概念中包含的一个重要因素是群体特权对统治群体中那些人的种族地位的影响。群体特权是赋予优势群体的不劳而获的优势;因为优势不是通过能力或努力获得的,而是仅仅通过成为特权群体的一员而获得的(Johnson, 2006;麦金托什,1989;惠特利和凯特,2006)。群体特权的一个后果是,它往往是自我延续的,因为不劳而获的优势往往被那些拥有它们的人所忽视(Johnson, 2006;McIntosh, 1989),这有助于维持特权制度和优势的成员占主导地位的群体(约翰逊,2006)。群体特权的另一个后果是对少数群体成员的偏见态度,歧视或不应得的负面待遇(Dovidio & Gaertner, 1986),这可以采取多种形式;从回避、排斥到彻底拒绝(Johnson, 2006;Feagin & McKinney, 2003)。群体特权的高潮是一种不平等的文化——“经历偏见和歧视的缺点和不争的特权的优点”(惠特利和凯特,2006,第15页)。全国范围内的大学一直在通过在个别课程课程中注入多元文化内容,或要求开设多元化课程来满足毕业要求,从而增加其多样性举措(Nesbitt, 2004;绿色,2000;汉弗莱,2000)。多样性教育项目的目的不仅是让学生在更广泛的社会中理解和欣赏多样性,而且还激发对种族主义、偏见、压迫、特权和歧视等问题的批判性思维(Abrams & Gibson, 2007;Garcia & Melendez, 1997;Benjamin & Schwartz, 1995;莱昂斯-劳伦斯,1994)。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing Awareness of Group Privilege with College Students.
A qualitative study was conducted with 850 participants in 36 different classes including Child and Family Studies, Human Relations, Aviation, and Community Studies in a university in the Midwest. The study conducted was based on a simulated discrimination exercise to increase awareness of group privilege and preferential treatment among college students. Based on the reviewing and coding of the participants' reflections, the following five major themes were identified: awareness of differential application of rules based on group identity; the emotional impact of being treated unfairly; the effect of a person in power's nonverbal and verbal behavior on participants; individual reactions within and between groups; and what makes it hard to talk about race. ********** When asked about their racial views members of the dominant group endorse abstract principles of racial equality and fairness yet continue to oppose pragmatic initiatives and programs to reduce racial inequality (Schuman, Steeh, Bobo, & Krysan, 1997; Sears, Hetts, Sidanius, & Bobo, 2000; Bonilla-Silva & Forman, 2000). Many dominant group members also do not consider themselves prejudiced, but hold negative racial stereotypes, have feelings of resentment and dislike towards minorities, deny the existence of racial prejudice and discrimination, attribute lack of minority economic gains to a lack of hard work, and believe intervening programs have unfairly advantaged minority groups at the expense of the those in the dominant group (Henry & Sears, 2002; Sears & Henry, 2003). This belief system reflects what social science scholars have termed modern racism (McConahay, Hardee, & Batts, 1981). While old-fashioned racism, overt racist practices and the belief in the biological inferiority of Blacks, continues to exist, modern racism reflects the apparent contradiction between endorsement of racial equality, the rejection of policies to bring about racial equality, and prejudice attitudes; culminating in economic, social, educational, and political adverse consequences for minority groups (Kinder & Sears, 1981; Feagin & Sikes, 1994; Dovidio & Gaertner, 1986; Feagin & McKinney, 2003; McConahay & Hough, 1976). An important factor embedded within the notion of modern racism is the influence of group privilege on the racial positions of those in the dominant group. Group privilege is the unearned advantage conferred to the dominant group; unearned because advantages are obtained not by ability or effort but rather by solely being a member of a privileged group (Johnson, 2006; McIntosh, 1989; Whitley & Kite, 2006). A consequence of group privilege is it is often self perpetuating because the unearned advantages are often oblivious to those that hold them (Johnson, 2006; McIntosh, 1989), which helps maintain systems of privilege and advantages for members of the dominant group (Johnson, 2006). Another consequence of group privilege is prejudical attitudes, discrimination or undeserved negative treatment occurs against members of a minority group (Dovidio & Gaertner, 1986), which can take many forms; from avoidance, exclusion, to outright rejection (Johnson, 2006; Feagin & McKinney, 2003). What culminates from group privilege is a culture of inequality- "the disadvantages of experiencing prejudice and discrimination and the advantages of unearned privilege" (Whitley & Kite, 2006, p. 15). Colleges nationwide have been increasing their diversity initiatives through infusing multicultural content within individual course curricula, or requiring a diversity course(s) to satisfy graduation requirements (Nesbitt, 2004; Greens, 2000; Humphrey, 2000). Diversity education programs aim to not only prepare students for an understanding of and appreciation for diversity within the broader society, but also to stimulate critical thinking about issues such as racism, prejudice, oppression, privilege, and discrimination (Abrams & Gibson, 2007; Garcia & Melendez, 1997; Benjamin & Schwartz, 1995; and Lyons-Lawrence, 1994). …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信