陪审团审判创新能提高陪审员对DNA证据的理解吗

Q3 Social Sciences
Judicature Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI:10.1037/e569092006-001
B. Dann, V. Hans, D. Kaye
{"title":"陪审团审判创新能提高陪审员对DNA证据的理解吗","authors":"B. Dann, V. Hans, D. Kaye","doi":"10.1037/e569092006-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on a study of the impact of jury trial innovations on mock jurors’ understanding of contested mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) evidence. Jurors in different experimental conditions were tested both before and after deliberations to test their comprehension of the DNA evidence.","PeriodicalId":35633,"journal":{"name":"Judicature","volume":"90 1","pages":"152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Jury Trial Innovations Improve Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence\",\"authors\":\"B. Dann, V. Hans, D. Kaye\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e569092006-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reports on a study of the impact of jury trial innovations on mock jurors’ understanding of contested mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) evidence. Jurors in different experimental conditions were tested both before and after deliberations to test their comprehension of the DNA evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicature\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e569092006-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e569092006-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

本文报道了陪审团审判创新对模拟陪审员对有争议的线粒体DNA (mtDNA)证据的理解的影响的研究。在不同的实验条件下,陪审员在审议之前和之后都接受了测试,以测试他们对DNA证据的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Jury Trial Innovations Improve Juror Understanding of DNA Evidence
This article reports on a study of the impact of jury trial innovations on mock jurors’ understanding of contested mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) evidence. Jurors in different experimental conditions were tested both before and after deliberations to test their comprehension of the DNA evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Judicature
Judicature Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Judicature is a forum for fact and opinion relating to all aspects of the administration of justice and its improvement. Readers are invited to submit articles, news, and letters for publication. Judicature, a refereed journal, notifies authors of its decisions within 45 days and publishes most accepted articles within six months. To facilitate anonymous reviewing, please submit two copies, one with all identifying information removed. Hard copies are not required.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信