组织公民行为与性别:绩效的期望与归因。

Q3 Social Sciences
Sara K. Farrell, Lisa M. Finkelstein
{"title":"组织公民行为与性别:绩效的期望与归因。","authors":"Sara K. Farrell, Lisa M. Finkelstein","doi":"10.1037/e518612013-535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research suggests that women are more likely to participate in the helping dimension of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) whereas men are more likely to participate in the civic virtue dimension. Three laboratory studies were conducted to test the hypotheses that observers expect employees to participate in gender-congruent OCBs and that, when exhibited, observers are more likely to attribute gender-incongruent OCBs than gender-congruent OCBs to impression management motives. Results indicated that OCBs in general were expected more of women than of men. Only under specific conditions were OCB-civic virtue behaviors expected more of men. Additionally, participants were more likely to attribute men's OCB than women's OCB to impression management motives. Implications and future research suggestions are discussed. Over the past two decades, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) has become a popular research topic among industrial / organizational psychologists. One line of research has investigated the degree to which OCB impacts performance appraisal ratings (see Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Paine, & Bachrach, 2000 for a review). Other research has begun to explore the relationship between OCB and gender (Allen & Rush, 2001; Ehrhart & Godfrey, 2003; Heilman & Chen, 2005; Kidder, 2002). The goal of the current research was to replicate previous research on the link between OCB and gender using an alternative methodology and to extend that previous research by investigating differences in attributions made by the perceivers of such behavior. A commonly used definition of OCB was put forth by Organ: \"individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in the aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization\" (Organ, 1988, p. 4). Accordingly, OCB is typically considered \"extra-role\" behavior. However, many researchers have acknowledged that employees who engage in OCB are often informally rewarded for such actions in performance appraisals (e.g., Allen & Rush, 1998; Organ, 1997). In addition, recent articles have generated interest in investigating the possibility that subtle discrimination exists such that men and women are differentially rewarded in performance appraisals based on their participation in OCBs (e.g., Allen, 2004; Heilman & Chen, 2005; Kidder & Parks, 2001). This position is grounded in the assumption that women are expected to participate in certain dimensions of OCBs, whereas men are expected to participate in others. In fact, actual research in this particular area has been limited (Allen & Rush, 2001; Podsakoff, McKenzie, Paine, & Bacharach, 2000). Research on gender differences has focused on two of Organ's (1988) dimensions in particular: helping and civic virtue. The helping dimension includes behaviors that help a specific other person (e.g., assisting others with their workloads). The dimension of civic virtue was first described by Graham (1986, as cited in Organ, 1988) as including behaviors that reflect responsible participation in, involvement with, and concern about the life of the employing organization (e.g., attending non-mandatory meetings). As Heilman and Chen (2005) point out, \"Being a helper is central to female gender stereotype prescriptions, which dictate that women be nurturing and socially oriented (communal)\" (p. 431). Civic virtue, on the other hand, can be considered agentic behavior (i.e., involving assertiveness and independence), which is more consistent with prescriptions associated with the male gender stereotype. This logic has led previous researchers to predict that helping behavior is more likely to be expected of women whereas civic virtue behavior is more likely to be expected of men. Although some researchers have looked at the possibility that men and women are differentially rewarded for participation in these dimensions of OCB (Allen, 2004; Heilman & Chen, 2005), others have focused on the more fundamental question of whether OCBs from the helping dimension are more expected from women and those from the civic virtue dimension are more expected from men (Ehrhart & Godfrey, 2003; Heilman & Chen, 2005). …","PeriodicalId":35502,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational citizenship behavior and gender: Expectations and attributions for performance.\",\"authors\":\"Sara K. Farrell, Lisa M. Finkelstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e518612013-535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent research suggests that women are more likely to participate in the helping dimension of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) whereas men are more likely to participate in the civic virtue dimension. Three laboratory studies were conducted to test the hypotheses that observers expect employees to participate in gender-congruent OCBs and that, when exhibited, observers are more likely to attribute gender-incongruent OCBs than gender-congruent OCBs to impression management motives. Results indicated that OCBs in general were expected more of women than of men. Only under specific conditions were OCB-civic virtue behaviors expected more of men. Additionally, participants were more likely to attribute men's OCB than women's OCB to impression management motives. Implications and future research suggestions are discussed. Over the past two decades, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) has become a popular research topic among industrial / organizational psychologists. One line of research has investigated the degree to which OCB impacts performance appraisal ratings (see Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Paine, & Bachrach, 2000 for a review). Other research has begun to explore the relationship between OCB and gender (Allen & Rush, 2001; Ehrhart & Godfrey, 2003; Heilman & Chen, 2005; Kidder, 2002). The goal of the current research was to replicate previous research on the link between OCB and gender using an alternative methodology and to extend that previous research by investigating differences in attributions made by the perceivers of such behavior. A commonly used definition of OCB was put forth by Organ: \\\"individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in the aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization\\\" (Organ, 1988, p. 4). Accordingly, OCB is typically considered \\\"extra-role\\\" behavior. However, many researchers have acknowledged that employees who engage in OCB are often informally rewarded for such actions in performance appraisals (e.g., Allen & Rush, 1998; Organ, 1997). In addition, recent articles have generated interest in investigating the possibility that subtle discrimination exists such that men and women are differentially rewarded in performance appraisals based on their participation in OCBs (e.g., Allen, 2004; Heilman & Chen, 2005; Kidder & Parks, 2001). This position is grounded in the assumption that women are expected to participate in certain dimensions of OCBs, whereas men are expected to participate in others. In fact, actual research in this particular area has been limited (Allen & Rush, 2001; Podsakoff, McKenzie, Paine, & Bacharach, 2000). Research on gender differences has focused on two of Organ's (1988) dimensions in particular: helping and civic virtue. The helping dimension includes behaviors that help a specific other person (e.g., assisting others with their workloads). The dimension of civic virtue was first described by Graham (1986, as cited in Organ, 1988) as including behaviors that reflect responsible participation in, involvement with, and concern about the life of the employing organization (e.g., attending non-mandatory meetings). As Heilman and Chen (2005) point out, \\\"Being a helper is central to female gender stereotype prescriptions, which dictate that women be nurturing and socially oriented (communal)\\\" (p. 431). Civic virtue, on the other hand, can be considered agentic behavior (i.e., involving assertiveness and independence), which is more consistent with prescriptions associated with the male gender stereotype. This logic has led previous researchers to predict that helping behavior is more likely to be expected of women whereas civic virtue behavior is more likely to be expected of men. Although some researchers have looked at the possibility that men and women are differentially rewarded for participation in these dimensions of OCB (Allen, 2004; Heilman & Chen, 2005), others have focused on the more fundamental question of whether OCBs from the helping dimension are more expected from women and those from the civic virtue dimension are more expected from men (Ehrhart & Godfrey, 2003; Heilman & Chen, 2005). …\",\"PeriodicalId\":35502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"120\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e518612013-535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e518612013-535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120

摘要

最近的研究表明,女性更倾向于参与组织公民行为(OCB)的帮助维度,而男性更倾向于参与公民美德维度。本研究进行了三项实验室研究,以验证以下假设:观察者期望员工参与性别一致的组织行为,而当表现出来时,观察者更有可能将性别不一致的组织行为归因于印象管理动机,而不是性别一致的组织行为。结果表明,总体而言,对女性的预期高于男性。只有在特定的条件下,公民道德行为对男性的期望更高。此外,参与者更倾向于将男性的组织公民行为归因于印象管理动机。讨论了研究的启示和未来的研究建议。在过去的二十年中,组织公民行为(OCB)已成为工业/组织心理学家的热门研究课题。一项研究调查了公民组织行为对绩效评估评级的影响程度(见Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Paine, & Bachrach, 2000年的评论)。其他研究已经开始探索组织公民行为与性别之间的关系(Allen & Rush, 2001;Ehrhart & Godfrey, 2003;Heilman & Chen, 2005;基德尔,2002)。本研究的目的是使用另一种方法复制先前关于公民行为和性别之间关系的研究,并通过调查感知者对这种行为的归因差异来扩展先前的研究。组织公民行为的一个常用定义是由Organ提出的:“个人行为是自由裁量的,不直接或明确地得到正式奖励制度的认可,总的来说,它促进了组织的有效运作”(Organ, 1988, p. 4)。因此,组织公民行为通常被认为是“角色外”行为。然而,许多研究人员已经承认,从事组织公民行为的员工在绩效评估中往往会因为这种行为而得到非正式的奖励(例如,Allen & Rush, 1998;器官,1997)。此外,最近的文章引起了人们对调查微妙歧视存在的可能性的兴趣,例如男性和女性在绩效评估中根据其参与ocb而获得不同的奖励(例如,Allen, 2004;Heilman & Chen, 2005;Kidder & Parks, 2001)。这一立场是基于这样的假设,即女性被期望参与组织公民行为的某些方面,而男性则被期望参与其他方面。事实上,在这一特定领域的实际研究是有限的(Allen & Rush, 2001;Podsakoff, McKenzie, Paine, & Bacharach, 2000)。性别差异的研究主要集中在Organ(1988)的两个维度上:助人和公民美德。帮助维度包括帮助特定他人的行为(例如,帮助他人完成工作量)。公民美德的维度首先由Graham (1986, Organ, 1988)描述为包括反映负责任的参与、参与和关心雇佣组织生活的行为(例如,参加非强制性会议)。正如Heilman和Chen(2005)所指出的,“作为一个帮助者是女性性别刻板印象的核心,这决定了女性是养育和社会导向的(社区)。”(p。431)。另一方面,公民美德可以被认为是代理行为(即涉及自信和独立),这更符合与男性性别刻板印象相关的处方。这一逻辑导致先前的研究人员预测,女性更有可能做出帮助行为,而男性更有可能做出公民美德行为。尽管一些研究人员已经研究了男性和女性在参与组织公民行为这些维度时获得不同回报的可能性(Allen, 2004;Heilman & Chen, 2005),其他人则关注更基本的问题,即女性是否更期望来自帮助维度的公民公民行为,而男性是否更期望来自公民美德维度的公民公民行为(Ehrhart & Godfrey, 2003;Heilman & Chen, 2005)。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizational citizenship behavior and gender: Expectations and attributions for performance.
Recent research suggests that women are more likely to participate in the helping dimension of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) whereas men are more likely to participate in the civic virtue dimension. Three laboratory studies were conducted to test the hypotheses that observers expect employees to participate in gender-congruent OCBs and that, when exhibited, observers are more likely to attribute gender-incongruent OCBs than gender-congruent OCBs to impression management motives. Results indicated that OCBs in general were expected more of women than of men. Only under specific conditions were OCB-civic virtue behaviors expected more of men. Additionally, participants were more likely to attribute men's OCB than women's OCB to impression management motives. Implications and future research suggestions are discussed. Over the past two decades, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) has become a popular research topic among industrial / organizational psychologists. One line of research has investigated the degree to which OCB impacts performance appraisal ratings (see Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Paine, & Bachrach, 2000 for a review). Other research has begun to explore the relationship between OCB and gender (Allen & Rush, 2001; Ehrhart & Godfrey, 2003; Heilman & Chen, 2005; Kidder, 2002). The goal of the current research was to replicate previous research on the link between OCB and gender using an alternative methodology and to extend that previous research by investigating differences in attributions made by the perceivers of such behavior. A commonly used definition of OCB was put forth by Organ: "individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in the aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization" (Organ, 1988, p. 4). Accordingly, OCB is typically considered "extra-role" behavior. However, many researchers have acknowledged that employees who engage in OCB are often informally rewarded for such actions in performance appraisals (e.g., Allen & Rush, 1998; Organ, 1997). In addition, recent articles have generated interest in investigating the possibility that subtle discrimination exists such that men and women are differentially rewarded in performance appraisals based on their participation in OCBs (e.g., Allen, 2004; Heilman & Chen, 2005; Kidder & Parks, 2001). This position is grounded in the assumption that women are expected to participate in certain dimensions of OCBs, whereas men are expected to participate in others. In fact, actual research in this particular area has been limited (Allen & Rush, 2001; Podsakoff, McKenzie, Paine, & Bacharach, 2000). Research on gender differences has focused on two of Organ's (1988) dimensions in particular: helping and civic virtue. The helping dimension includes behaviors that help a specific other person (e.g., assisting others with their workloads). The dimension of civic virtue was first described by Graham (1986, as cited in Organ, 1988) as including behaviors that reflect responsible participation in, involvement with, and concern about the life of the employing organization (e.g., attending non-mandatory meetings). As Heilman and Chen (2005) point out, "Being a helper is central to female gender stereotype prescriptions, which dictate that women be nurturing and socially oriented (communal)" (p. 431). Civic virtue, on the other hand, can be considered agentic behavior (i.e., involving assertiveness and independence), which is more consistent with prescriptions associated with the male gender stereotype. This logic has led previous researchers to predict that helping behavior is more likely to be expected of women whereas civic virtue behavior is more likely to be expected of men. Although some researchers have looked at the possibility that men and women are differentially rewarded for participation in these dimensions of OCB (Allen, 2004; Heilman & Chen, 2005), others have focused on the more fundamental question of whether OCBs from the helping dimension are more expected from women and those from the civic virtue dimension are more expected from men (Ehrhart & Godfrey, 2003; Heilman & Chen, 2005). …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
North American Journal of Psychology
North American Journal of Psychology Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信