过敏性疾病

Anne-Marie Irani
{"title":"过敏性疾病","authors":"Anne-Marie Irani","doi":"10.1055/b-0034-75314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an attempt to explain the nature of biologic and psychologic predisposing factors in allergic disease, this study compared 3 theoretical models: (1) the reciprocal-interaction, (2) the positive-interaction, and (3) the summation models. In order to test the relevance of each of these theories, biologic and psychologic batteries, used in our previous research, were revised and applied to a total of 79 male college students. Three groups were examined: 29 allergies, 27 normals, and 23 nonatopic symptomatic subjects evidencing predominantly vasomotor rhinitis. The best explanation of allergic predisposition seemed to be stated by the summation model. On the basis of this theory, a combined biopsychologic test of vulnerability to allergic illness was used, with the finding that 78.6% (44 in 56 cases) of allergies and normals were accurately differentiated. The results lent some support to the positive-interaction model; both factors tended to be high concurrently in allergy, but a positive correlation between them was not found. This study found no evidence in support of the reciprocalinteraction theory. Vasomotor cases were found to be similar to allergies on the psychologic dimension and like normals on measures of biologic predisposition. It was in regard to this group with mild, nonatopic symptoms that the reciprocal model, with its emphasis on mutually exclusive factors, seemed best suited.","PeriodicalId":85634,"journal":{"name":"The Antiseptic","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allergic disorders\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Marie Irani\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/b-0034-75314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an attempt to explain the nature of biologic and psychologic predisposing factors in allergic disease, this study compared 3 theoretical models: (1) the reciprocal-interaction, (2) the positive-interaction, and (3) the summation models. In order to test the relevance of each of these theories, biologic and psychologic batteries, used in our previous research, were revised and applied to a total of 79 male college students. Three groups were examined: 29 allergies, 27 normals, and 23 nonatopic symptomatic subjects evidencing predominantly vasomotor rhinitis. The best explanation of allergic predisposition seemed to be stated by the summation model. On the basis of this theory, a combined biopsychologic test of vulnerability to allergic illness was used, with the finding that 78.6% (44 in 56 cases) of allergies and normals were accurately differentiated. The results lent some support to the positive-interaction model; both factors tended to be high concurrently in allergy, but a positive correlation between them was not found. This study found no evidence in support of the reciprocalinteraction theory. Vasomotor cases were found to be similar to allergies on the psychologic dimension and like normals on measures of biologic predisposition. It was in regard to this group with mild, nonatopic symptoms that the reciprocal model, with its emphasis on mutually exclusive factors, seemed best suited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Antiseptic\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Antiseptic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0034-75314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Antiseptic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0034-75314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

用一种简单、实用、廉价的方法制备、储存和使用皮肤试验用冷冻食品。通过划痕试验方法,再次确认了生食品产生免疫阳性皮肤反应的能力。在冷冻状态下储存几个月,在进行一系列试验之前立即解冻,对材料的致敏性没有影响。在过敏和非过敏人群中,生的食物被发现对皮肤和非致荨麻疹无害。通过抓痕测试方法,生的食物比相应的商业提取物在同一系列测试中引起的真正的积极反应更大,数量也更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Allergic disorders
In an attempt to explain the nature of biologic and psychologic predisposing factors in allergic disease, this study compared 3 theoretical models: (1) the reciprocal-interaction, (2) the positive-interaction, and (3) the summation models. In order to test the relevance of each of these theories, biologic and psychologic batteries, used in our previous research, were revised and applied to a total of 79 male college students. Three groups were examined: 29 allergies, 27 normals, and 23 nonatopic symptomatic subjects evidencing predominantly vasomotor rhinitis. The best explanation of allergic predisposition seemed to be stated by the summation model. On the basis of this theory, a combined biopsychologic test of vulnerability to allergic illness was used, with the finding that 78.6% (44 in 56 cases) of allergies and normals were accurately differentiated. The results lent some support to the positive-interaction model; both factors tended to be high concurrently in allergy, but a positive correlation between them was not found. This study found no evidence in support of the reciprocalinteraction theory. Vasomotor cases were found to be similar to allergies on the psychologic dimension and like normals on measures of biologic predisposition. It was in regard to this group with mild, nonatopic symptoms that the reciprocal model, with its emphasis on mutually exclusive factors, seemed best suited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信