追踪新生儿重症监护病房锐度之旅

Pamela Pockras MSN, APRN, NNP-BC, Kevin Fischer MSN, APRN, PNP-BC, Cynthia Acree-Hamann DNP, APRN, NNP-BC, Heather Ryle DNP APRN, NNP-BC
{"title":"追踪新生儿重症监护病房锐度之旅","authors":"Pamela Pockras MSN, APRN, NNP-BC,&nbsp;Kevin Fischer MSN, APRN, PNP-BC,&nbsp;Cynthia Acree-Hamann DNP, APRN, NNP-BC,&nbsp;Heather Ryle DNP APRN, NNP-BC","doi":"10.1053/j.nainr.2016.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In 2001, The Institute of Medicine (IOM) proposed six aims for changing the American health care system. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (n.d.) </span><span><sup>1</sup></span><span> Those aims were intended to make the future health care system; Safe, Timely, Effective, Efficient, Equitable, and Patient-Centered. With the acronym of STEEEP, the proposal provided a very steep learning curve for the United States Health Care System. Fortunately for nursing leaders, having been trained in providing a safe environment for patients, monitoring trends, and solving problems, the learning curve was not as steep. A small group of multidisciplinary leaders have been working on achieving these aims in a midwest level IV neonatal intensive care unit<span>. The focus has been to improve patient safety through appropriate staffing and communication amongst health care providers with the use of evidence, structure, and technology.The team of multidisciplinary leaders have redesigned the rounding process, improved communication, tracked acuity, and enhanced staffing as a result of tracking productivity and acuity in the NICU.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":87414,"journal":{"name":"Newborn and infant nursing reviews : NAINR","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 149-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.nainr.2016.07.009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Journey to Tracking Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Acuity\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Pockras MSN, APRN, NNP-BC,&nbsp;Kevin Fischer MSN, APRN, PNP-BC,&nbsp;Cynthia Acree-Hamann DNP, APRN, NNP-BC,&nbsp;Heather Ryle DNP APRN, NNP-BC\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.nainr.2016.07.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>In 2001, The Institute of Medicine (IOM) proposed six aims for changing the American health care system. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (n.d.) </span><span><sup>1</sup></span><span> Those aims were intended to make the future health care system; Safe, Timely, Effective, Efficient, Equitable, and Patient-Centered. With the acronym of STEEEP, the proposal provided a very steep learning curve for the United States Health Care System. Fortunately for nursing leaders, having been trained in providing a safe environment for patients, monitoring trends, and solving problems, the learning curve was not as steep. A small group of multidisciplinary leaders have been working on achieving these aims in a midwest level IV neonatal intensive care unit<span>. The focus has been to improve patient safety through appropriate staffing and communication amongst health care providers with the use of evidence, structure, and technology.The team of multidisciplinary leaders have redesigned the rounding process, improved communication, tracked acuity, and enhanced staffing as a result of tracking productivity and acuity in the NICU.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Newborn and infant nursing reviews : NAINR\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 149-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.nainr.2016.07.009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Newborn and infant nursing reviews : NAINR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1527336916300502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Newborn and infant nursing reviews : NAINR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1527336916300502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2001年,医学研究所(IOM)提出了改变美国医疗保健系统的六个目标。医疗保健改善研究所(n.d) 1这些目标旨在使未来的医疗保健系统;安全、及时、有效、高效、公平、以患者为中心。该提案的首字母缩写为steep,为美国医疗保健系统提供了一条非常陡峭的学习曲线。幸运的是,对于护理领导者来说,他们已经接受了为病人提供安全环境、监测趋势和解决问题的培训,学习曲线并没有那么陡峭。一个多学科的领导小组一直致力于在中西部四级新生儿重症监护病房实现这些目标。重点是利用证据、结构和技术,通过适当的人员配置和卫生保健提供者之间的沟通来改善患者安全。多学科领导团队重新设计了舍入流程,改善了沟通,跟踪了敏锐度,并通过跟踪新生儿重症监护室的生产力和敏锐度,增加了人员配备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Journey to Tracking Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Acuity

In 2001, The Institute of Medicine (IOM) proposed six aims for changing the American health care system. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (n.d.) 1 Those aims were intended to make the future health care system; Safe, Timely, Effective, Efficient, Equitable, and Patient-Centered. With the acronym of STEEEP, the proposal provided a very steep learning curve for the United States Health Care System. Fortunately for nursing leaders, having been trained in providing a safe environment for patients, monitoring trends, and solving problems, the learning curve was not as steep. A small group of multidisciplinary leaders have been working on achieving these aims in a midwest level IV neonatal intensive care unit. The focus has been to improve patient safety through appropriate staffing and communication amongst health care providers with the use of evidence, structure, and technology.The team of multidisciplinary leaders have redesigned the rounding process, improved communication, tracked acuity, and enhanced staffing as a result of tracking productivity and acuity in the NICU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信