临床医生对放置胎儿血氧计传感器的看法

Christine E East RN, RM, DipApplSc (ClinNursStud), BApplSC(Nurs), MMedSc, Paul B Colditz MB, BS, FRACP, MBiomedE, DPhil(Oxon)
{"title":"临床医生对放置胎儿血氧计传感器的看法","authors":"Christine E East RN, RM, DipApplSc (ClinNursStud), BApplSC(Nurs), MMedSc,&nbsp;Paul B Colditz MB, BS, FRACP, MBiomedE, DPhil(Oxon)","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2000.00379.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <b>Abstract</b> The aim of this study was to determine clinicians’ perceptions of placing a fetal oximetry sensor. A survey was developed seeking details of staff category, birth suite experience, previous sensor placement, ease of application and use of epidural analgesia. Following staff feedback, the survey was revised from asking clinicians to rate women’s comfort during sensor placement, to a visual analogue scale (VAS) of the clinician’s assessment of the women’s pain during sensor placement. Survey validity was sought from experts during development and for specific questions using item-total correlation in this analysis. Ease of sensor placement (<i>n</i> = 131) was rated as good or excellent 71% of the time. Clinicians rated women’s comfort during sensor placement as good or excellent in 90% of cases. Median pain VAS was 0 (range 0–7.5). Item-total correlations of survey questions were all significant. Fetal oximetry sensor placement was rated well by clinicians in this purpose-designed survey.</p>","PeriodicalId":79407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","volume":"20 4","pages":"161-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2000.00379.x","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicians’ perceptions of placing a fetal oximetry sensor\",\"authors\":\"Christine E East RN, RM, DipApplSc (ClinNursStud), BApplSC(Nurs), MMedSc,&nbsp;Paul B Colditz MB, BS, FRACP, MBiomedE, DPhil(Oxon)\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1440-1762.2000.00379.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <b>Abstract</b> The aim of this study was to determine clinicians’ perceptions of placing a fetal oximetry sensor. A survey was developed seeking details of staff category, birth suite experience, previous sensor placement, ease of application and use of epidural analgesia. Following staff feedback, the survey was revised from asking clinicians to rate women’s comfort during sensor placement, to a visual analogue scale (VAS) of the clinician’s assessment of the women’s pain during sensor placement. Survey validity was sought from experts during development and for specific questions using item-total correlation in this analysis. Ease of sensor placement (<i>n</i> = 131) was rated as good or excellent 71% of the time. Clinicians rated women’s comfort during sensor placement as good or excellent in 90% of cases. Median pain VAS was 0 (range 0–7.5). Item-total correlations of survey questions were all significant. Fetal oximetry sensor placement was rated well by clinicians in this purpose-designed survey.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of quality in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"161-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2000.00379.x\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of quality in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2000.00379.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quality in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1440-1762.2000.00379.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要:本研究的目的是确定临床医生对放置胎儿血氧仪传感器的看法。开展了一项调查,寻求工作人员类别,产房经验,以前的传感器放置,易于应用和使用硬膜外镇痛的细节。根据工作人员的反馈,调查从要求临床医生评估女性在传感器放置期间的舒适度,修改为临床医生评估女性在传感器放置期间的疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)。调查效度是在开发过程中从专家那里寻求的,并且在这个分析中使用项目-总相关性来回答特定的问题。传感器放置的便利性(n = 131) 71%的时间被评为良好或优秀。在90%的病例中,临床医生将女性在放置传感器时的舒适度评为良好或优秀。中位疼痛VAS评分为0(范围0 - 7.5)。调查问题的项目-总量相关性均显著。在这项目的调查中,临床医生对胎儿血氧仪传感器放置的评价很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinicians’ perceptions of placing a fetal oximetry sensor

Abstract The aim of this study was to determine clinicians’ perceptions of placing a fetal oximetry sensor. A survey was developed seeking details of staff category, birth suite experience, previous sensor placement, ease of application and use of epidural analgesia. Following staff feedback, the survey was revised from asking clinicians to rate women’s comfort during sensor placement, to a visual analogue scale (VAS) of the clinician’s assessment of the women’s pain during sensor placement. Survey validity was sought from experts during development and for specific questions using item-total correlation in this analysis. Ease of sensor placement (n = 131) was rated as good or excellent 71% of the time. Clinicians rated women’s comfort during sensor placement as good or excellent in 90% of cases. Median pain VAS was 0 (range 0–7.5). Item-total correlations of survey questions were all significant. Fetal oximetry sensor placement was rated well by clinicians in this purpose-designed survey.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信