心理治疗监督中的伦理问题。

A. S. Newman
{"title":"心理治疗监督中的伦理问题。","authors":"A. S. Newman","doi":"10.1037/0735-7028.12.6.690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supervision is the accepted training model for the teaching and learning ofpsychotherapeutic skills. Although standards of ethical behavior between a psychotherapist and client have been established, specific guidelines for ethical behavior between a supervisor and trainee have not been delineated. Given the importance of the supervisory relationship in the development of competent psychotherapists, the relatively powerless and dependent position of the trainee, and the potential occurrence of therapylike experiences in supervision, the development of guidelines outlining the rights of trainees and responsibilities of supervisors is indicated. \"Psychologists respect the worth of the individual and honor the preservation and protection of fundamental human rights\" (American Psychological Association, [APA] 1977a, p. 1). This quote from the \"Ethical Standards of Psychologists\" is a statement of a commitment by psychologists to ensure the rights and to promote the welfare of their clients. This commitment has been given specific meaning for the client-therapist relationship (Hare-Mustin, Marecek, Kaplan, & Liss-Levinson, 1979), for providers of psychological services (APA, 1977b), and for therapy with female clients (APA, 1978a). Although the mandate is clear, the specific implications of this commitment for the conduct of psychotherapy supervision have received limited attention in the professional literature. Except for one article on sexual behavior between supervisor and trainee (Pope, Schover, & Levinson, 1980) and another article on standards of competency for supervisors (APA, 1971), virtually no examination of the ethical issues within supervision has been made. An examination of ethical issues in psychotherapy supervision is critical for three major reasons. First, the supervisory relationship is the primary training model for the development of psychotherapeutic skills. Second, the supervisory relationship is inherently unequal in status, power, and expertise. Third, insofar as trainees are expected to evaluate their own performance and to increase self-awareness within the context of supervision, the relationship possesses therapylike qualities. Each of these reasons will be briefly discussed, with emphasis on clarifying the responsibilities of supervisors and the rights of supervisees.","PeriodicalId":82386,"journal":{"name":"Professional psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"690-695"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/0735-7028.12.6.690","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical issues in the supervision of psychotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"A. S. Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/0735-7028.12.6.690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supervision is the accepted training model for the teaching and learning ofpsychotherapeutic skills. Although standards of ethical behavior between a psychotherapist and client have been established, specific guidelines for ethical behavior between a supervisor and trainee have not been delineated. Given the importance of the supervisory relationship in the development of competent psychotherapists, the relatively powerless and dependent position of the trainee, and the potential occurrence of therapylike experiences in supervision, the development of guidelines outlining the rights of trainees and responsibilities of supervisors is indicated. \\\"Psychologists respect the worth of the individual and honor the preservation and protection of fundamental human rights\\\" (American Psychological Association, [APA] 1977a, p. 1). This quote from the \\\"Ethical Standards of Psychologists\\\" is a statement of a commitment by psychologists to ensure the rights and to promote the welfare of their clients. This commitment has been given specific meaning for the client-therapist relationship (Hare-Mustin, Marecek, Kaplan, & Liss-Levinson, 1979), for providers of psychological services (APA, 1977b), and for therapy with female clients (APA, 1978a). Although the mandate is clear, the specific implications of this commitment for the conduct of psychotherapy supervision have received limited attention in the professional literature. Except for one article on sexual behavior between supervisor and trainee (Pope, Schover, & Levinson, 1980) and another article on standards of competency for supervisors (APA, 1971), virtually no examination of the ethical issues within supervision has been made. An examination of ethical issues in psychotherapy supervision is critical for three major reasons. First, the supervisory relationship is the primary training model for the development of psychotherapeutic skills. Second, the supervisory relationship is inherently unequal in status, power, and expertise. Third, insofar as trainees are expected to evaluate their own performance and to increase self-awareness within the context of supervision, the relationship possesses therapylike qualities. Each of these reasons will be briefly discussed, with emphasis on clarifying the responsibilities of supervisors and the rights of supervisees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professional psychology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"690-695\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/0735-7028.12.6.690\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professional psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.12.6.690\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.12.6.690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

督导是公认的心理治疗技能教与学的培训模式。虽然心理治疗师和来访者之间的道德行为标准已经确立,但主管和受训者之间的道德行为的具体指导方针尚未明确。鉴于监督关系在培养有能力的心理治疗师中的重要性,受训人员相对无力和依赖的地位,以及在监督中可能发生的类似治疗的经历,建议制定指导方针,概述受训人员的权利和主管的责任。“心理学家尊重个人的价值,尊重对基本人权的维护和保护”(美国心理学协会,[APA] 1977a,第1页)。这句话引自《心理学家的道德标准》,是心理学家承诺确保其客户的权利并促进其福利的声明。对于来访者-治疗师关系(Hare-Mustin, mrecek, Kaplan, & lys - levinson, 1979)、心理服务提供者(APA, 1977b)和女性来访者的治疗(APA, 1978a),这种承诺被赋予了特定的含义。虽然这项任务是明确的,但这一承诺对心理治疗监督行为的具体影响在专业文献中受到的关注有限。除了一篇关于主管和学员之间性行为的文章(Pope, Schover, & Levinson, 1980)和另一篇关于主管能力标准的文章(APA, 1971)之外,几乎没有对监管中的伦理问题进行过审查。对心理治疗监督中的伦理问题的检查至关重要,主要有三个原因。首先,监督关系是心理治疗技能发展的主要训练模式。其次,监督关系在地位、权力和专业知识上本质上是不平等的。第三,只要受训者被期望在监督的背景下评估自己的表现并提高自我意识,这种关系就具有治疗般的品质。本文将简要讨论这些原因,重点是明确监督者的责任和被监督者的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethical issues in the supervision of psychotherapy.
Supervision is the accepted training model for the teaching and learning ofpsychotherapeutic skills. Although standards of ethical behavior between a psychotherapist and client have been established, specific guidelines for ethical behavior between a supervisor and trainee have not been delineated. Given the importance of the supervisory relationship in the development of competent psychotherapists, the relatively powerless and dependent position of the trainee, and the potential occurrence of therapylike experiences in supervision, the development of guidelines outlining the rights of trainees and responsibilities of supervisors is indicated. "Psychologists respect the worth of the individual and honor the preservation and protection of fundamental human rights" (American Psychological Association, [APA] 1977a, p. 1). This quote from the "Ethical Standards of Psychologists" is a statement of a commitment by psychologists to ensure the rights and to promote the welfare of their clients. This commitment has been given specific meaning for the client-therapist relationship (Hare-Mustin, Marecek, Kaplan, & Liss-Levinson, 1979), for providers of psychological services (APA, 1977b), and for therapy with female clients (APA, 1978a). Although the mandate is clear, the specific implications of this commitment for the conduct of psychotherapy supervision have received limited attention in the professional literature. Except for one article on sexual behavior between supervisor and trainee (Pope, Schover, & Levinson, 1980) and another article on standards of competency for supervisors (APA, 1971), virtually no examination of the ethical issues within supervision has been made. An examination of ethical issues in psychotherapy supervision is critical for three major reasons. First, the supervisory relationship is the primary training model for the development of psychotherapeutic skills. Second, the supervisory relationship is inherently unequal in status, power, and expertise. Third, insofar as trainees are expected to evaluate their own performance and to increase self-awareness within the context of supervision, the relationship possesses therapylike qualities. Each of these reasons will be briefly discussed, with emphasis on clarifying the responsibilities of supervisors and the rights of supervisees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信