{"title":"多项目问卷离群值检测的不一致性检验","authors":"W. Zijlstra, L. V. D. Ark, K. Sijtsma","doi":"10.1027/1614-2241/A000056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sensitivity and the specificity of four outlier scores were studied for four different discordancy tests. The outlier scores were the Mahalanobis distance, a robust version of the Mahalanobis distance, and two measures tailored to discrete data, known as O+ and G+. The discordancy tests were Tukey’s fences (a.k.a. boxplot). Tukey’s fences with adjustment for skewness (adjusted boxplot), the generalized extreme studentized deviate (ESD), and the transformed ESD (ESD-T). Outlier scores O+ and G+ performed better than the Mahalanobis distance and its robust version. Discordancy tests ESD-T and adjusted boxplot were advocated for high specificity and ESD for high sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discordancy Tests for Outlier Detection in Multi-Item Questionnaires\",\"authors\":\"W. Zijlstra, L. V. D. Ark, K. Sijtsma\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/1614-2241/A000056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The sensitivity and the specificity of four outlier scores were studied for four different discordancy tests. The outlier scores were the Mahalanobis distance, a robust version of the Mahalanobis distance, and two measures tailored to discrete data, known as O+ and G+. The discordancy tests were Tukey’s fences (a.k.a. boxplot). Tukey’s fences with adjustment for skewness (adjusted boxplot), the generalized extreme studentized deviate (ESD), and the transformed ESD (ESD-T). Outlier scores O+ and G+ performed better than the Mahalanobis distance and its robust version. Discordancy tests ESD-T and adjusted boxplot were advocated for high specificity and ESD for high sensitivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/A000056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/A000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discordancy Tests for Outlier Detection in Multi-Item Questionnaires
The sensitivity and the specificity of four outlier scores were studied for four different discordancy tests. The outlier scores were the Mahalanobis distance, a robust version of the Mahalanobis distance, and two measures tailored to discrete data, known as O+ and G+. The discordancy tests were Tukey’s fences (a.k.a. boxplot). Tukey’s fences with adjustment for skewness (adjusted boxplot), the generalized extreme studentized deviate (ESD), and the transformed ESD (ESD-T). Outlier scores O+ and G+ performed better than the Mahalanobis distance and its robust version. Discordancy tests ESD-T and adjusted boxplot were advocated for high specificity and ESD for high sensitivity.