评估长者照顾残疾的并发症:“不适用”何时适用?

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
E. Helmes, A. Campbell
{"title":"评估长者照顾残疾的并发症:“不适用”何时适用?","authors":"E. Helmes, A. Campbell","doi":"10.1024/1662-9647/A000018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cases of severe disability present both practical and psychometric problems when the disability limits function in domains other than the primary one. A re-analysis of the normative sample for the Multidimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects (MOSES; Helmes, Csapo, & Short, 1987) contrasted different approaches to dealing with its 18 items that include a “does not apply” option. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare scoring options for such items. Items were also analyzed using item response theory, which revealed several distinct options for the 18 items in question. Several MOSES items do not need the use of the “does not apply” scoring option. A revision of MOSES to incorporate the revised scoring for those 10 items is in order.","PeriodicalId":45525,"journal":{"name":"GeroPsych-The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"23 1","pages":"155-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complications with assessing disability in care of the aged: when does \\\"does not apply\\\" apply?\",\"authors\":\"E. Helmes, A. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/1662-9647/A000018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cases of severe disability present both practical and psychometric problems when the disability limits function in domains other than the primary one. A re-analysis of the normative sample for the Multidimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects (MOSES; Helmes, Csapo, & Short, 1987) contrasted different approaches to dealing with its 18 items that include a “does not apply” option. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare scoring options for such items. Items were also analyzed using item response theory, which revealed several distinct options for the 18 items in question. Several MOSES items do not need the use of the “does not apply” scoring option. A revision of MOSES to incorporate the revised scoring for those 10 items is in order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeroPsych-The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"155-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeroPsych-The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/A000018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeroPsych-The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/A000018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

严重残疾的病例中,当残疾的功能限制在非主要领域时,会出现实际和心理测量问题。老年受试者多维观察量表(MOSES;Helmes, Csapo, & Short, 1987)对比了处理包含“不适用”选项的18个项目的不同方法。验证性因子分析用于比较这些项目的评分选项。项目也使用项目反应理论进行分析,该理论揭示了18个问题项目的几个不同选择。一些MOSES项目不需要使用“不适用”评分选项。为了将这10个项目的修订得分纳入摩西的修订是有序的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complications with assessing disability in care of the aged: when does "does not apply" apply?
Cases of severe disability present both practical and psychometric problems when the disability limits function in domains other than the primary one. A re-analysis of the normative sample for the Multidimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects (MOSES; Helmes, Csapo, & Short, 1987) contrasted different approaches to dealing with its 18 items that include a “does not apply” option. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare scoring options for such items. Items were also analyzed using item response theory, which revealed several distinct options for the 18 items in question. Several MOSES items do not need the use of the “does not apply” scoring option. A revision of MOSES to incorporate the revised scoring for those 10 items is in order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信