妯娌:性别与税法解释

G. Handelman
{"title":"妯娌:性别与税法解释","authors":"G. Handelman","doi":"10.1017/CBO9780511609800.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notwithstanding the insights of conventionalism and the appeal of the concept of an \"interpretive community,\"' there is both obvious and not-so-obvious diversity in the legal profession, even behind the apparent homogeneity of the upper-middle-class mainstream legal elite. The differences play themselves out not only in our substantive conclusions as lawyers but also in the way we reason, not only in our policy judgments but also in our methodology. My particular concern in this Essay is how these differences manifest themselves in the central task of tax lawyering: statutory construction. For the past few years, I have been worrying about people's belligerent attitudes toward paying taxes and the consequent ethic among some taxpayers and their legal advisers that seems to condone misrepresentation and virtual thievery in reporting income tax liability. 2 My focus has been on defining standards of intellectual","PeriodicalId":83388,"journal":{"name":"UCLA women's law journal","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/CBO9780511609800.018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SISTERS IN LAW: GENDER AND THE INTERPRETATION OF TAX STATUTES\",\"authors\":\"G. Handelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/CBO9780511609800.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Notwithstanding the insights of conventionalism and the appeal of the concept of an \\\"interpretive community,\\\"' there is both obvious and not-so-obvious diversity in the legal profession, even behind the apparent homogeneity of the upper-middle-class mainstream legal elite. The differences play themselves out not only in our substantive conclusions as lawyers but also in the way we reason, not only in our policy judgments but also in our methodology. My particular concern in this Essay is how these differences manifest themselves in the central task of tax lawyering: statutory construction. For the past few years, I have been worrying about people's belligerent attitudes toward paying taxes and the consequent ethic among some taxpayers and their legal advisers that seems to condone misrepresentation and virtual thievery in reporting income tax liability. 2 My focus has been on defining standards of intellectual\",\"PeriodicalId\":83388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UCLA women's law journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/CBO9780511609800.018\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UCLA women's law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609800.018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCLA women's law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609800.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有传统主义的见解和“解释共同体”概念的吸引力,但在法律职业中,即使在中上层主流法律精英明显的同质性背后,也存在着明显和不那么明显的多样性。这些差异不仅体现在我们作为律师的实质性结论上,也体现在我们的推理方式上,不仅体现在我们的政策判断上,也体现在我们的方法论上。在本文中,我特别关注的是这些差异如何在税务律师的中心任务:法律构建中表现出来。在过去的几年里,我一直在担心人们对纳税的好战态度,以及一些纳税人和他们的法律顾问由此产生的道德观念,他们似乎纵容了在申报所得税义务时的虚假陈述和实际上的盗窃行为。我的重点是定义知识分子的标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SISTERS IN LAW: GENDER AND THE INTERPRETATION OF TAX STATUTES
Notwithstanding the insights of conventionalism and the appeal of the concept of an "interpretive community,"' there is both obvious and not-so-obvious diversity in the legal profession, even behind the apparent homogeneity of the upper-middle-class mainstream legal elite. The differences play themselves out not only in our substantive conclusions as lawyers but also in the way we reason, not only in our policy judgments but also in our methodology. My particular concern in this Essay is how these differences manifest themselves in the central task of tax lawyering: statutory construction. For the past few years, I have been worrying about people's belligerent attitudes toward paying taxes and the consequent ethic among some taxpayers and their legal advisers that seems to condone misrepresentation and virtual thievery in reporting income tax liability. 2 My focus has been on defining standards of intellectual
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信