博茨瓦纳大学图书馆的机构资源库:机遇与挑战

R. Kgosiemang
{"title":"博茨瓦纳大学图书馆的机构资源库:机遇与挑战","authors":"R. Kgosiemang","doi":"10.1017/s0305862x00020550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionInstitutional Repository (IR) is seen as a new way for an institution to contribute to the broader world of scholarship. The system is also seen as a collaboration between libraries, technologists, administrators, and faculty to enhance access to the scholarship of the institution. Preserving the institution's intellectual property and increasing the institution's visibility and prestige are some of the reasons for establishing an institutional repository (Macha and De Jager, 2011). Giesecke (2011) is of the view that institutional repositories require carefully thought plans, mutual consultation among all stakeholders and \"with intellectual leadership from the faculty and the library working in partnership\" there will be successful preservation and continued fostering of the growth of the human knowledge. Despite all the efforts by the University of Botswana Office of Research and Development (ORD), Department of Library Services and Information Technology (IT) to lay a foundation for the launch of IR, to sensitise and create awareness, and to solicit support from the stakeholders, there are still challenges that affect the smooth implementation of IR at the University of Botswana. It is the purpose of this paper to discuss the challenges faced by the University of Botswana Library to successfully populate the IR. The attempt by both the University and Library staff to develop and implement an Institutional Repository has not been a smooth sailing.Lack of a Constituted IR TeamFrom the point of view of a Subject Librarian one of the biggest challenges that affected the successful implementation of IR at the University of Botswana Library was Library Management's failure to constitute an IR Team. What exists as the IR team are staff scattered all over the place, each with various roles and responsibilities that make concentration on IR difficult. There are archivists on the one hand responsible for the preservation of records as well as IR metadata quality control and collaboration with publishers; technical staff responsible for technical processes and customer service. Such a disparate range of participants needs clear coordination and lines of operations.The challenge with IR staff belonging to diverse units is that it creates a workflow problem. Research articles are submitted to technical staff to upload into DSpace, an open software package that provides the tools for management of digital assets and which is commonly used as the basis for an institutional repository. The uploaded content is then submitted to the editors in the archives unit where quality control takes place. Due to insufficient knowledge amongst the technical staff, content is sometimes uploaded without all the necessary steps having been taken to verify publisher status. This not only creates a backlog of content that requires editing, it also creates a communication problem between all the parties, especially when the Subject Librarians who submitted the research papers to technical staff are kept in the dark about the status of the articles. Not only does this affect Subject Librarians who are responsible for populating IR in their departments, but it also disrupts the relationship between faculty staff who may have submitted research papers to Subject Librarians. Further, these factors contribute to the slow implementation of the IR.Lack of enthusiasm in submitting research articlesThe process of obtaining articles from faculty members involved Subject Librarians liaising with departments, informing them about IR and requesting them to submit their research papers for inclusion in IR. Some methods included requesting invitations to departmental meetings where proper advocacy could be carried out. This proved to be difficult in some departments because it has always been a problem for librarians to be invited to departmental meetings to market library services and products. This would explain why some subject areas have more content than others. …","PeriodicalId":89063,"journal":{"name":"African research & documentation","volume":"1 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Repositories at the University of Botswana Library: Opportunities and Challenges\",\"authors\":\"R. Kgosiemang\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0305862x00020550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionInstitutional Repository (IR) is seen as a new way for an institution to contribute to the broader world of scholarship. The system is also seen as a collaboration between libraries, technologists, administrators, and faculty to enhance access to the scholarship of the institution. Preserving the institution's intellectual property and increasing the institution's visibility and prestige are some of the reasons for establishing an institutional repository (Macha and De Jager, 2011). Giesecke (2011) is of the view that institutional repositories require carefully thought plans, mutual consultation among all stakeholders and \\\"with intellectual leadership from the faculty and the library working in partnership\\\" there will be successful preservation and continued fostering of the growth of the human knowledge. Despite all the efforts by the University of Botswana Office of Research and Development (ORD), Department of Library Services and Information Technology (IT) to lay a foundation for the launch of IR, to sensitise and create awareness, and to solicit support from the stakeholders, there are still challenges that affect the smooth implementation of IR at the University of Botswana. It is the purpose of this paper to discuss the challenges faced by the University of Botswana Library to successfully populate the IR. The attempt by both the University and Library staff to develop and implement an Institutional Repository has not been a smooth sailing.Lack of a Constituted IR TeamFrom the point of view of a Subject Librarian one of the biggest challenges that affected the successful implementation of IR at the University of Botswana Library was Library Management's failure to constitute an IR Team. What exists as the IR team are staff scattered all over the place, each with various roles and responsibilities that make concentration on IR difficult. There are archivists on the one hand responsible for the preservation of records as well as IR metadata quality control and collaboration with publishers; technical staff responsible for technical processes and customer service. Such a disparate range of participants needs clear coordination and lines of operations.The challenge with IR staff belonging to diverse units is that it creates a workflow problem. Research articles are submitted to technical staff to upload into DSpace, an open software package that provides the tools for management of digital assets and which is commonly used as the basis for an institutional repository. The uploaded content is then submitted to the editors in the archives unit where quality control takes place. Due to insufficient knowledge amongst the technical staff, content is sometimes uploaded without all the necessary steps having been taken to verify publisher status. This not only creates a backlog of content that requires editing, it also creates a communication problem between all the parties, especially when the Subject Librarians who submitted the research papers to technical staff are kept in the dark about the status of the articles. Not only does this affect Subject Librarians who are responsible for populating IR in their departments, but it also disrupts the relationship between faculty staff who may have submitted research papers to Subject Librarians. Further, these factors contribute to the slow implementation of the IR.Lack of enthusiasm in submitting research articlesThe process of obtaining articles from faculty members involved Subject Librarians liaising with departments, informing them about IR and requesting them to submit their research papers for inclusion in IR. Some methods included requesting invitations to departmental meetings where proper advocacy could be carried out. This proved to be difficult in some departments because it has always been a problem for librarians to be invited to departmental meetings to market library services and products. This would explain why some subject areas have more content than others. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":89063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African research & documentation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African research & documentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305862x00020550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African research & documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305862x00020550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机构知识库(IR)被视为一个机构为更广阔的学术世界做出贡献的新途径。该系统也被视为图书馆、技术人员、管理人员和教师之间的合作,以提高获得该机构奖学金的机会。保护机构的知识产权和提高机构的知名度和声望是建立机构知识库的一些原因(Macha和De Jager, 2011)。Giesecke(2011)认为,机构知识库需要经过深思熟虑的计划,所有利益相关者之间的相互协商,以及“在教职员工和图书馆合作的智力领导下”,才能成功地保存和持续促进人类知识的增长。尽管博茨瓦纳大学研究与发展办公室(ORD)、图书馆服务和信息技术部(IT)努力为IR的启动奠定基础,提高认识和创造意识,并征求利益相关者的支持,但影响博茨瓦纳大学IR顺利实施的挑战仍然存在。本文的目的是讨论博茨瓦纳大学图书馆在成功填充IR方面所面临的挑战。大学和图书馆工作人员开发和实施机构资料库的尝试并非一帆风顺。从学科馆员的角度来看,影响博茨瓦纳大学图书馆成功实施IR的最大挑战之一是图书馆管理部门未能组建一个IR团队。作为IR团队存在的是分散在各地的员工,每个人都有不同的角色和责任,这使得专注于IR变得困难。档案保管员一方面负责保存记录,以及IR元数据的质量控制和与出版商的合作;负责技术流程和客户服务的技术人员。如此不同范围的参与者需要明确的协调和业务线。IR员工属于不同单位的挑战在于它会产生工作流程问题。研究文章提交给技术人员上传到DSpace,这是一个开放的软件包,提供了管理数字资产的工具,通常用作机构存储库的基础。然后将上传的内容提交给进行质量控制的存档单元中的编辑。由于技术人员的知识不足,有时上传的内容没有采取所有必要的步骤来验证发布者的状态。这不仅造成了需要编辑的内容积压,还造成了各方之间的沟通问题,特别是当向技术人员提交研究论文的学科图书管理员对文章的状态一无所知时。这不仅影响了负责在其部门中填充IR的学科图书馆员,而且还破坏了可能向学科图书馆员提交研究论文的教员之间的关系。此外,这些因素导致IR实施缓慢。缺乏提交研究论文的热情从教师那里获得文章的过程涉及学科图书馆员与院系联系,告知他们有关IR的信息,并要求他们提交研究论文以纳入IR。有些方法包括邀请参加部门会议,以便进行适当的宣传。这在一些部门证明是困难的,因为邀请图书馆员参加部门会议推销图书馆服务和产品一直是一个问题。这就解释了为什么有些学科领域比其他学科领域有更多的内容。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional Repositories at the University of Botswana Library: Opportunities and Challenges
IntroductionInstitutional Repository (IR) is seen as a new way for an institution to contribute to the broader world of scholarship. The system is also seen as a collaboration between libraries, technologists, administrators, and faculty to enhance access to the scholarship of the institution. Preserving the institution's intellectual property and increasing the institution's visibility and prestige are some of the reasons for establishing an institutional repository (Macha and De Jager, 2011). Giesecke (2011) is of the view that institutional repositories require carefully thought plans, mutual consultation among all stakeholders and "with intellectual leadership from the faculty and the library working in partnership" there will be successful preservation and continued fostering of the growth of the human knowledge. Despite all the efforts by the University of Botswana Office of Research and Development (ORD), Department of Library Services and Information Technology (IT) to lay a foundation for the launch of IR, to sensitise and create awareness, and to solicit support from the stakeholders, there are still challenges that affect the smooth implementation of IR at the University of Botswana. It is the purpose of this paper to discuss the challenges faced by the University of Botswana Library to successfully populate the IR. The attempt by both the University and Library staff to develop and implement an Institutional Repository has not been a smooth sailing.Lack of a Constituted IR TeamFrom the point of view of a Subject Librarian one of the biggest challenges that affected the successful implementation of IR at the University of Botswana Library was Library Management's failure to constitute an IR Team. What exists as the IR team are staff scattered all over the place, each with various roles and responsibilities that make concentration on IR difficult. There are archivists on the one hand responsible for the preservation of records as well as IR metadata quality control and collaboration with publishers; technical staff responsible for technical processes and customer service. Such a disparate range of participants needs clear coordination and lines of operations.The challenge with IR staff belonging to diverse units is that it creates a workflow problem. Research articles are submitted to technical staff to upload into DSpace, an open software package that provides the tools for management of digital assets and which is commonly used as the basis for an institutional repository. The uploaded content is then submitted to the editors in the archives unit where quality control takes place. Due to insufficient knowledge amongst the technical staff, content is sometimes uploaded without all the necessary steps having been taken to verify publisher status. This not only creates a backlog of content that requires editing, it also creates a communication problem between all the parties, especially when the Subject Librarians who submitted the research papers to technical staff are kept in the dark about the status of the articles. Not only does this affect Subject Librarians who are responsible for populating IR in their departments, but it also disrupts the relationship between faculty staff who may have submitted research papers to Subject Librarians. Further, these factors contribute to the slow implementation of the IR.Lack of enthusiasm in submitting research articlesThe process of obtaining articles from faculty members involved Subject Librarians liaising with departments, informing them about IR and requesting them to submit their research papers for inclusion in IR. Some methods included requesting invitations to departmental meetings where proper advocacy could be carried out. This proved to be difficult in some departments because it has always been a problem for librarians to be invited to departmental meetings to market library services and products. This would explain why some subject areas have more content than others. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信