{"title":"表演和不公正的余波:当代南非及以后的舞蹈和现场艺术。安娜堡:密歇根大学出版社,2020,pp. xviii + 286, 18幅插图。布85美元,纸39.95美元,电子书39.95美元。","authors":"E. Charlton","doi":"10.1017/S0040557421000429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For good reason, proscenium staging has fallen out of favor in recent decades. Taken to be a synonym for passivity, its constraints on the theatrical imagination have been largely replaced by a suite of more active, immersive, and site-specific strategies. In performance spaces across the Global South, however, it is not only this rising taste for interaction that has driven the proscenium’s demise. Caught up in the history of colonial power, as Catherine M. Cole notes in Performance and the Afterlives of Injustice: Dance and Live Art in Contemporary South Africa and Beyond, proscenium staging served originally to displace many of those indigenous performance traditions ill-suited to such a comparatively static form. Cole cites, for example, the “more communal” (170) circular stages once common to Congolese dance. We might recall, too, the participatory impulses that historically conditioned performances of praise poetry across southern Africa. In this context, the fading popularity of the proscenium stage has also been understood as vital for the revival of these and many other more kinetic indigenous traditions. In charting the recent rise of live art in countries like South Africa and the DRC, however, Cole is careful to resist the idea of a pristine return to the precolonial past, whether onstage or in society at large. Attuned to the entangled, often intractable afterlives of racial injustice not just in Africa but across the globe, her latest book explores instead the unresolved wrongs that often remain long after the basic architecture of white, colonial power has been dismantled. This is not to give up on the possibility of “a world that is otherwise,” as Cole puts it (220), echoing decolonial thinkers like Walter Mignolo. But neither is it to assume that simple strategies like a return to circular staging can perform theatre’s decolonization. Rather, Cole’s critique attempts to “dwell in complexity” by enduring the “lack of resolution” that necessarily stalks the pursuit of justice after colonialism (32). As such, in this latest study, she actively extends the sense of political irresolution that animates her","PeriodicalId":42777,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE SURVEY","volume":"63 1","pages":"115 - 117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance and the Afterlives of Injustice: Dance and Live Art in Contemporary South Africa and Beyond By Catherine M. Cole. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2020, pp. xviii + 286, 18 illustrations. $85 cloth, $39.95 paper, $39.95 e-book.\",\"authors\":\"E. Charlton\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0040557421000429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For good reason, proscenium staging has fallen out of favor in recent decades. Taken to be a synonym for passivity, its constraints on the theatrical imagination have been largely replaced by a suite of more active, immersive, and site-specific strategies. In performance spaces across the Global South, however, it is not only this rising taste for interaction that has driven the proscenium’s demise. Caught up in the history of colonial power, as Catherine M. Cole notes in Performance and the Afterlives of Injustice: Dance and Live Art in Contemporary South Africa and Beyond, proscenium staging served originally to displace many of those indigenous performance traditions ill-suited to such a comparatively static form. Cole cites, for example, the “more communal” (170) circular stages once common to Congolese dance. We might recall, too, the participatory impulses that historically conditioned performances of praise poetry across southern Africa. In this context, the fading popularity of the proscenium stage has also been understood as vital for the revival of these and many other more kinetic indigenous traditions. In charting the recent rise of live art in countries like South Africa and the DRC, however, Cole is careful to resist the idea of a pristine return to the precolonial past, whether onstage or in society at large. Attuned to the entangled, often intractable afterlives of racial injustice not just in Africa but across the globe, her latest book explores instead the unresolved wrongs that often remain long after the basic architecture of white, colonial power has been dismantled. This is not to give up on the possibility of “a world that is otherwise,” as Cole puts it (220), echoing decolonial thinkers like Walter Mignolo. But neither is it to assume that simple strategies like a return to circular staging can perform theatre’s decolonization. Rather, Cole’s critique attempts to “dwell in complexity” by enduring the “lack of resolution” that necessarily stalks the pursuit of justice after colonialism (32). As such, in this latest study, she actively extends the sense of political irresolution that animates her\",\"PeriodicalId\":42777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEATRE SURVEY\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"115 - 117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEATRE SURVEY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0040557421000429\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE SURVEY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0040557421000429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
近几十年来,舞台舞台已经不再受欢迎,这是有充分理由的。作为被动的同义词,它对戏剧想象力的限制在很大程度上已经被一套更主动、沉浸式和特定于场地的策略所取代。然而,在全球南方的表演空间中,推动舞台消亡的不仅仅是这种对互动的日益增长的品味。正如凯瑟琳·m·科尔(Catherine M. Cole)在《表演与非正义的余生:当代南非及其他地区的舞蹈与现场艺术》(Performance and Afterlives of Injustice: Dance and Live Art in Contemporary South Africa)一书中所指出的那样,在殖民权力的历史中,舞台表演最初是为了取代许多不适合这种相对静态形式的本土表演传统。科尔举了一个例子,“更公共的”(170个)圆形舞台曾经是刚果舞蹈中常见的。我们也许还会想起,在历史上制约了整个非洲南部赞美诗表演的参与性冲动。在这种背景下,舞台舞台的衰落也被理解为对这些和许多其他更具活力的土著传统的复兴至关重要。然而,在描绘最近在南非和刚果民主共和国等国家兴起的现场艺术时,科尔小心翼翼地抵制了回归前殖民时代的想法,无论是在舞台上还是在整个社会中。不仅在非洲,而且在全球范围内,她的新书与种族不公正的纠缠,往往是棘手的后遗症相协调,而是探讨了在白人殖民权力的基本架构被拆除后很久仍未解决的错误。这并不是要放弃“另一个世界”的可能性,正如科尔所说(220页),呼应了沃尔特·米尼奥洛(Walter Mignolo)等非殖民主义思想家。但也不能假设回归圆形舞台这样的简单策略就能实现剧院的非殖民化。相反,科尔的批判试图通过忍受殖民主义之后对正义的追求必然伴随着的“缺乏解决方案”而“陷于复杂性”(32)。因此,在这个最新的研究中,她积极地扩展了让她充满活力的政治优柔寡断感
Performance and the Afterlives of Injustice: Dance and Live Art in Contemporary South Africa and Beyond By Catherine M. Cole. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2020, pp. xviii + 286, 18 illustrations. $85 cloth, $39.95 paper, $39.95 e-book.
For good reason, proscenium staging has fallen out of favor in recent decades. Taken to be a synonym for passivity, its constraints on the theatrical imagination have been largely replaced by a suite of more active, immersive, and site-specific strategies. In performance spaces across the Global South, however, it is not only this rising taste for interaction that has driven the proscenium’s demise. Caught up in the history of colonial power, as Catherine M. Cole notes in Performance and the Afterlives of Injustice: Dance and Live Art in Contemporary South Africa and Beyond, proscenium staging served originally to displace many of those indigenous performance traditions ill-suited to such a comparatively static form. Cole cites, for example, the “more communal” (170) circular stages once common to Congolese dance. We might recall, too, the participatory impulses that historically conditioned performances of praise poetry across southern Africa. In this context, the fading popularity of the proscenium stage has also been understood as vital for the revival of these and many other more kinetic indigenous traditions. In charting the recent rise of live art in countries like South Africa and the DRC, however, Cole is careful to resist the idea of a pristine return to the precolonial past, whether onstage or in society at large. Attuned to the entangled, often intractable afterlives of racial injustice not just in Africa but across the globe, her latest book explores instead the unresolved wrongs that often remain long after the basic architecture of white, colonial power has been dismantled. This is not to give up on the possibility of “a world that is otherwise,” as Cole puts it (220), echoing decolonial thinkers like Walter Mignolo. But neither is it to assume that simple strategies like a return to circular staging can perform theatre’s decolonization. Rather, Cole’s critique attempts to “dwell in complexity” by enduring the “lack of resolution” that necessarily stalks the pursuit of justice after colonialism (32). As such, in this latest study, she actively extends the sense of political irresolution that animates her