亚利桑那州图森市的墨西哥裔美国人研究以及阿科斯塔诉赫彭塔尔案的裁决

IF 0.1 Q3 LAW
Molly Schiffer , Stephen A. Nuño
{"title":"亚利桑那州图森市的墨西哥裔美国人研究以及阿科斯塔诉赫彭塔尔案的裁决","authors":"Molly Schiffer ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Nuño","doi":"10.1016/S1870-0578(16)30016-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span></span>This note examines the political context surrounding the banning of the Mexican American Studies program in Tucson, Arizona and the Acosta v. Huppenthal decision, which leaves the ban largely intact. The convergence of economic crisis and partisan politics contributed to the rise in anxiety over the demographic shifts of the state of Arizona, for which Mexican American Studies became a symbolic target for Republicans. Mexican American Studies was declared in violation of a new law passed by the Republican dominated legislature, A.R.S. § 15-112, by Arizona Superintendent John Huppenthal, despite the conclusion by an independent audit he ordered which concluded otherwise. This left leaders within the Mexican American community and civil rights organizations with the conclusion that the ban on Mexican American Studies was politically motivated. This note explores the motivations by individual political actors, such as the current Attorney General of Arizona Tom Horne, and how he rose to power on a platform centered on the ban against Mexican American Studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41684,"journal":{"name":"Mexican Law Review","volume":"6 2","pages":"Pages 299-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1870-0578(16)30016-6","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mexican-American studies in tucson, arizona and the acosta v. huppenthal decision\",\"authors\":\"Molly Schiffer ,&nbsp;Stephen A. Nuño\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1870-0578(16)30016-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span></span>This note examines the political context surrounding the banning of the Mexican American Studies program in Tucson, Arizona and the Acosta v. Huppenthal decision, which leaves the ban largely intact. The convergence of economic crisis and partisan politics contributed to the rise in anxiety over the demographic shifts of the state of Arizona, for which Mexican American Studies became a symbolic target for Republicans. Mexican American Studies was declared in violation of a new law passed by the Republican dominated legislature, A.R.S. § 15-112, by Arizona Superintendent John Huppenthal, despite the conclusion by an independent audit he ordered which concluded otherwise. This left leaders within the Mexican American community and civil rights organizations with the conclusion that the ban on Mexican American Studies was politically motivated. This note explores the motivations by individual political actors, such as the current Attorney General of Arizona Tom Horne, and how he rose to power on a platform centered on the ban against Mexican American Studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mexican Law Review\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 299-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1870-0578(16)30016-6\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mexican Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1870057816300166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mexican Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1870057816300166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了围绕亚利桑那州图森市禁止墨西哥裔美国人研究项目的政治背景,以及阿科斯塔诉赫彭塔尔案的决定,该决定使禁令基本保持不变。经济危机和党派政治的结合,加剧了人们对亚利桑那州人口结构变化的担忧,墨西哥裔美国人研究因此成为共和党人的象征性目标。墨西哥裔美国人研究被宣布违反了由共和党主导的立法机构,亚利桑那州负责人约翰·胡彭塔尔通过的新法律,A.R.S.§15-112,尽管他下令进行的独立审计得出了相反的结论。这使得墨西哥裔美国人社区和民权组织的领导人得出结论,禁止墨西哥裔美国人研究是出于政治动机。本文探讨了个人政治行为者的动机,如现任亚利桑那州总检察长汤姆霍恩,以及他如何在一个以禁止墨西哥裔美国人研究为中心的平台上上台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mexican-American studies in tucson, arizona and the acosta v. huppenthal decision

This note examines the political context surrounding the banning of the Mexican American Studies program in Tucson, Arizona and the Acosta v. Huppenthal decision, which leaves the ban largely intact. The convergence of economic crisis and partisan politics contributed to the rise in anxiety over the demographic shifts of the state of Arizona, for which Mexican American Studies became a symbolic target for Republicans. Mexican American Studies was declared in violation of a new law passed by the Republican dominated legislature, A.R.S. § 15-112, by Arizona Superintendent John Huppenthal, despite the conclusion by an independent audit he ordered which concluded otherwise. This left leaders within the Mexican American community and civil rights organizations with the conclusion that the ban on Mexican American Studies was politically motivated. This note explores the motivations by individual political actors, such as the current Attorney General of Arizona Tom Horne, and how he rose to power on a platform centered on the ban against Mexican American Studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信