评估放射技师在乳房x线摄影影像中发现异常的能力:一个决策分析试点项目

Judith J. Holt RTR, ACR, BAppSc (Medical Imaging), ABI
{"title":"评估放射技师在乳房x线摄影影像中发现异常的能力:一个决策分析试点项目","authors":"Judith J. Holt RTR, ACR, BAppSc (Medical Imaging), ABI","doi":"10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60133-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the radiological technologist's performance in detecting abnormalities in film-screen mammographic images.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty sets of 2-view bilateral mammographic images wereread and judged to be either benign, likely benign, suspicious of abnormality or highly suggestive of malignancy. Seven readers, 5 radiological technologists and 2 radiologists currently working in the field of mammography participated in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sensitivity of three-fifths of the technologists in detecting abnormalities that were likely to be a sign of breast cancer was 100%, which was comparable to the 2 participating radiologists. Specificity was also high amongst the technologists, with three-fifths being equal to (88.37%) or better (93.02%) than that of the radiologists (88.37%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Of those participating in this study, the findings indicate that the sensitivity and specificity of the majority of individual technologists to detect mammographic abnormalities is comparable to that of the radiologists when compared to the gold standard.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79737,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology","volume":"37 2","pages":"Pages 24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60133-X","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Radiological Technologist's Ability to Detect Abnormalities in Film-Screen Mammographic Images: A Decision Analysis Pilot Project\",\"authors\":\"Judith J. Holt RTR, ACR, BAppSc (Medical Imaging), ABI\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60133-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the radiological technologist's performance in detecting abnormalities in film-screen mammographic images.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty sets of 2-view bilateral mammographic images wereread and judged to be either benign, likely benign, suspicious of abnormality or highly suggestive of malignancy. Seven readers, 5 radiological technologists and 2 radiologists currently working in the field of mammography participated in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sensitivity of three-fifths of the technologists in detecting abnormalities that were likely to be a sign of breast cancer was 100%, which was comparable to the 2 participating radiologists. Specificity was also high amongst the technologists, with three-fifths being equal to (88.37%) or better (93.02%) than that of the radiologists (88.37%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Of those participating in this study, the findings indicate that the sensitivity and specificity of the majority of individual technologists to detect mammographic abnormalities is comparable to that of the radiologists when compared to the gold standard.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 24-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0820-5930(09)60133-X\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S082059300960133X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of medical radiation technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S082059300960133X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的探讨放射科医师在乳房x线片异常检查中的表现。MethodsFifty套两幅双边wereread乳腺图像和被认为是良性的,良性的,怀疑异常或高度提示恶性肿瘤。7名读者,5名放射技师和2名目前在乳房x线摄影领域工作的放射技师参与了这项研究。结果五分之三的技术人员对可能是乳腺癌征兆的异常的检测灵敏度为100%,与2名参与调查的放射科医生相当。技师的特异性也很高,五分之三的技师的特异性等于(88.37%)或高于(93.02%)放射科医师(88.37%)。在参与本研究的人员中,研究结果表明,与金标准相比,大多数技术人员检测乳房x线摄影异常的敏感性和特异性与放射科医生相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Radiological Technologist's Ability to Detect Abnormalities in Film-Screen Mammographic Images: A Decision Analysis Pilot Project

Purpose

To determine the radiological technologist's performance in detecting abnormalities in film-screen mammographic images.

Methods

Fifty sets of 2-view bilateral mammographic images wereread and judged to be either benign, likely benign, suspicious of abnormality or highly suggestive of malignancy. Seven readers, 5 radiological technologists and 2 radiologists currently working in the field of mammography participated in this study.

Results

The sensitivity of three-fifths of the technologists in detecting abnormalities that were likely to be a sign of breast cancer was 100%, which was comparable to the 2 participating radiologists. Specificity was also high amongst the technologists, with three-fifths being equal to (88.37%) or better (93.02%) than that of the radiologists (88.37%).

Conclusion

Of those participating in this study, the findings indicate that the sensitivity and specificity of the majority of individual technologists to detect mammographic abnormalities is comparable to that of the radiologists when compared to the gold standard.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信