马赫数为3时柔性板上冲击激波-湍流边界层相互作用的流固耦合

IF 2.8 Q2 MECHANICS
Jonathan Hoy, I. Bermejo-Moreno
{"title":"马赫数为3时柔性板上冲击激波-湍流边界层相互作用的流固耦合","authors":"Jonathan Hoy, I. Bermejo-Moreno","doi":"10.1017/flo.2022.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present high-fidelity numerical simulations of the interaction of an oblique shock impinging on the turbulent boundary layer developed over a rectangular flexible panel, replicating wind tunnel experiments by Daub et al. (AIAA Journal, vol. 54, 2016, pp. 670–678). The incoming free-stream Mach and unit Reynolds numbers are $M_{\\infty } = 3$ and $Re_{\\infty }=49.4\\times 10^6 {\\rm m}^{-1}$ , respectively. The reference boundary layer thickness upstream of the interaction with the shock is $\\delta _0 = 4$ mm. The oblique shock is generated with a rotating wedge initially parallel to the flow that increases the deflection angle up to $\\theta _{{max}} = 17.5^{\\circ }$ within approximately $15$ ms. A loosely coupled partitioned flow–structure interaction simulation methodology is used, combining a finite-volume flow solver of the compressible wall-modelled large-eddy simulation equations, an isoparametric finite-element solid mechanics solver and a spring-system-based mesh deformation solver. Simulations are conducted with rigid and flexible panels, and the results compared to elucidate the effects of panel flexibility on the interaction. Three-dimensional effects are evaluated by conducting simulations with both full ( $50 \\delta _0$ ) and reduced ( $5\\delta _0$ ) spanwise panel width, the latter enforcing spanwise periodicity. Panel flexibility is found to increase the separation bubble size and modify its spectral dynamics. Time- and spanwise-averaged streamwise profiles of the wall pressure exhibit a drop over the flexible panel prior to the interaction and a reduced peak pressure in comparison with the rigid case. Spectral analyses of wall pressure data indicate that the low-frequency motions have a similar spectral distribution for the rigid and flexible cases, but the flexible case shows a wider region dominated by low-frequency motions and traces of the panel vibration on the wall pressure signal. The sensitivity of the interaction to small variations in the wedge extent and incoming boundary layer thickness is evaluated. Predictions obtained from lower-fidelity modelling simplifications are also assessed.","PeriodicalId":93752,"journal":{"name":"Flow (Cambridge, England)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluid–structural coupling of an impinging shock–turbulent boundary layer interaction at Mach 3 over a flexible panel\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Hoy, I. Bermejo-Moreno\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/flo.2022.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present high-fidelity numerical simulations of the interaction of an oblique shock impinging on the turbulent boundary layer developed over a rectangular flexible panel, replicating wind tunnel experiments by Daub et al. (AIAA Journal, vol. 54, 2016, pp. 670–678). The incoming free-stream Mach and unit Reynolds numbers are $M_{\\\\infty } = 3$ and $Re_{\\\\infty }=49.4\\\\times 10^6 {\\\\rm m}^{-1}$ , respectively. The reference boundary layer thickness upstream of the interaction with the shock is $\\\\delta _0 = 4$ mm. The oblique shock is generated with a rotating wedge initially parallel to the flow that increases the deflection angle up to $\\\\theta _{{max}} = 17.5^{\\\\circ }$ within approximately $15$ ms. A loosely coupled partitioned flow–structure interaction simulation methodology is used, combining a finite-volume flow solver of the compressible wall-modelled large-eddy simulation equations, an isoparametric finite-element solid mechanics solver and a spring-system-based mesh deformation solver. Simulations are conducted with rigid and flexible panels, and the results compared to elucidate the effects of panel flexibility on the interaction. Three-dimensional effects are evaluated by conducting simulations with both full ( $50 \\\\delta _0$ ) and reduced ( $5\\\\delta _0$ ) spanwise panel width, the latter enforcing spanwise periodicity. Panel flexibility is found to increase the separation bubble size and modify its spectral dynamics. Time- and spanwise-averaged streamwise profiles of the wall pressure exhibit a drop over the flexible panel prior to the interaction and a reduced peak pressure in comparison with the rigid case. Spectral analyses of wall pressure data indicate that the low-frequency motions have a similar spectral distribution for the rigid and flexible cases, but the flexible case shows a wider region dominated by low-frequency motions and traces of the panel vibration on the wall pressure signal. The sensitivity of the interaction to small variations in the wedge extent and incoming boundary layer thickness is evaluated. Predictions obtained from lower-fidelity modelling simplifications are also assessed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flow (Cambridge, England)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flow (Cambridge, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/flo.2022.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow (Cambridge, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/flo.2022.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们提供了一个高保真的数值模拟,模拟了斜激波撞击在矩形柔性板上形成的湍流边界层上的相互作用,复制了Daub等人的风洞实验(AIAA Journal, vol. 54, 2016, pp. 670-678)。来流自由马赫数为$M_{\infty } = 3$,单位雷诺数为$Re_{\infty }=49.4\times 10^6 {\rm m}^{-1}$。与激波相互作用上游的参考边界层厚度为$\delta _0 = 4$ mm。斜激波是由一个最初平行于流动的旋转楔形体产生的,该楔形体将偏转角增加到$\theta _{{max}} = 17.5^{\circ }$,大约在$15$ ms内。等参数有限元固体力学求解器和基于弹簧系统的网格变形求解器。分别对刚性板和柔性板进行了仿真,并对仿真结果进行了比较,阐明了柔性板对交互作用的影响。三维效果的评估,通过进行模拟与全($50 \delta _0$)和减少($5\delta _0$)跨向面板宽度,后者强制跨向周期性。发现面板的柔性可以增加分离气泡的大小并改变其光谱动力学。与刚性壁板相比,弹性壁板的时间和展向平均流态压力曲线在相互作用之前呈现下降趋势,峰值压力也有所降低。对壁面压力数据的频谱分析表明,刚性工况和柔性工况的低频运动频谱分布相似,但柔性工况的壁面压力信号以低频运动为主的区域更广,且壁面压力信号上有面板振动的痕迹。计算了相互作用对楔形宽度和来面层厚度的微小变化的敏感性。从较低保真度的模型简化得到的预测也进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluid–structural coupling of an impinging shock–turbulent boundary layer interaction at Mach 3 over a flexible panel
We present high-fidelity numerical simulations of the interaction of an oblique shock impinging on the turbulent boundary layer developed over a rectangular flexible panel, replicating wind tunnel experiments by Daub et al. (AIAA Journal, vol. 54, 2016, pp. 670–678). The incoming free-stream Mach and unit Reynolds numbers are $M_{\infty } = 3$ and $Re_{\infty }=49.4\times 10^6 {\rm m}^{-1}$ , respectively. The reference boundary layer thickness upstream of the interaction with the shock is $\delta _0 = 4$ mm. The oblique shock is generated with a rotating wedge initially parallel to the flow that increases the deflection angle up to $\theta _{{max}} = 17.5^{\circ }$ within approximately $15$ ms. A loosely coupled partitioned flow–structure interaction simulation methodology is used, combining a finite-volume flow solver of the compressible wall-modelled large-eddy simulation equations, an isoparametric finite-element solid mechanics solver and a spring-system-based mesh deformation solver. Simulations are conducted with rigid and flexible panels, and the results compared to elucidate the effects of panel flexibility on the interaction. Three-dimensional effects are evaluated by conducting simulations with both full ( $50 \delta _0$ ) and reduced ( $5\delta _0$ ) spanwise panel width, the latter enforcing spanwise periodicity. Panel flexibility is found to increase the separation bubble size and modify its spectral dynamics. Time- and spanwise-averaged streamwise profiles of the wall pressure exhibit a drop over the flexible panel prior to the interaction and a reduced peak pressure in comparison with the rigid case. Spectral analyses of wall pressure data indicate that the low-frequency motions have a similar spectral distribution for the rigid and flexible cases, but the flexible case shows a wider region dominated by low-frequency motions and traces of the panel vibration on the wall pressure signal. The sensitivity of the interaction to small variations in the wedge extent and incoming boundary layer thickness is evaluated. Predictions obtained from lower-fidelity modelling simplifications are also assessed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信