实地采集作为解决地方粮食安全问题的工具:案例研究

Anne Hoisington , Sue N. Butkus , Steven Garrett , Kathy Beerman
{"title":"实地采集作为解决地方粮食安全问题的工具:案例研究","authors":"Anne Hoisington ,&nbsp;Sue N. Butkus ,&nbsp;Steven Garrett ,&nbsp;Kathy Beerman","doi":"10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60009-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Field gleaning, or harvesting crops after the commercial harvest, has been promoted as a way to increase food security; however, the effectiveness of gleaning programs is not well documented. The purpose of this research was to explore the impact of gleaning on individual gleaners and the community by documenting total amounts gleaned, individual uses of produce, and self-reported benefits and barriers to gleaning. During the 1997 season, ~50 gleaners participated in the Pierce County Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program Gleaning Project; 29 participated in an intensive 4-week study to track use of produce by gleaners. Onsite weighing of gleaned produce revealed that of the 110,000 pounds gleaned by these 50 gleaners from Pierce County farms and orchards during 1997, 85,000 pounds (77%) were donated to local emergency food programs; 25,000 pounds (23%) were taken home by gleaners. Of the produce taken home by the 29 study participants, an estimated 9% was used fresh, 48% was preserved for later user, and 43% was shared with others. During a combination of telephone and in-person interviews, gleaners reported using more fresh produce and sharing knowledge about gardening and food preservation. The most important benefits of gleaning were “stretching my food budget” and “helping provide food for the community.” Detailed exploration of the impact of gleaned produce on dietary patterns and use of validated food security measures is warranted considering the volume of produce used fresh, preserved for later use, and given away by gleaning participants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutrition education","volume":"33 1","pages":"Pages 43-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60009-2","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field Gleaning as a Tool for Addressing Food Security at the Local Level: Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Anne Hoisington ,&nbsp;Sue N. Butkus ,&nbsp;Steven Garrett ,&nbsp;Kathy Beerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60009-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Field gleaning, or harvesting crops after the commercial harvest, has been promoted as a way to increase food security; however, the effectiveness of gleaning programs is not well documented. The purpose of this research was to explore the impact of gleaning on individual gleaners and the community by documenting total amounts gleaned, individual uses of produce, and self-reported benefits and barriers to gleaning. During the 1997 season, ~50 gleaners participated in the Pierce County Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program Gleaning Project; 29 participated in an intensive 4-week study to track use of produce by gleaners. Onsite weighing of gleaned produce revealed that of the 110,000 pounds gleaned by these 50 gleaners from Pierce County farms and orchards during 1997, 85,000 pounds (77%) were donated to local emergency food programs; 25,000 pounds (23%) were taken home by gleaners. Of the produce taken home by the 29 study participants, an estimated 9% was used fresh, 48% was preserved for later user, and 43% was shared with others. During a combination of telephone and in-person interviews, gleaners reported using more fresh produce and sharing knowledge about gardening and food preservation. The most important benefits of gleaning were “stretching my food budget” and “helping provide food for the community.” Detailed exploration of the impact of gleaned produce on dietary patterns and use of validated food security measures is warranted considering the volume of produce used fresh, preserved for later use, and given away by gleaning participants.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nutrition education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 43-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60009-2\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nutrition education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404606600092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutrition education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404606600092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

田间采收,或在商业收获后收割作物,已被推广为增加粮食安全的一种方式;然而,收集程序的有效性并没有得到很好的证明。本研究的目的是通过记录收集的总量、农产品的个人用途以及自我报告的收集的好处和障碍,探索收集对个人拾集者和社区的影响。1997年,约50名拾荒者参加了皮尔斯县扩大食品和营养教育计划拾荒项目;29人参加了一项为期4周的集中研究,以跟踪拾荒者对农产品的使用情况。现场对收集到的农产品进行称重显示,1997年,这50名采摘者从皮尔斯县农场和果园收集到的11万磅农产品中,有8.5万磅(77%)捐赠给了当地的紧急食品项目;25000英镑(23%)被拾集者带回家。在29名研究参与者带回家的农产品中,估计有9%是新鲜食用的,48%是保存起来供以后食用的,43%是与他人分享的。在电话和面对面访谈的结合中,拾集者报告说他们使用了更多的新鲜农产品,并分享了园艺和食品保存方面的知识。拾荒最重要的好处是“延长了我的食物预算”和“帮助为社区提供食物”。考虑到收集的农产品的数量是新鲜的、保存起来供以后使用的,以及收集参与者赠送的,因此有必要详细探讨收集的农产品对饮食模式的影响,以及使用经过验证的粮食安全措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Field Gleaning as a Tool for Addressing Food Security at the Local Level: Case Study

Field gleaning, or harvesting crops after the commercial harvest, has been promoted as a way to increase food security; however, the effectiveness of gleaning programs is not well documented. The purpose of this research was to explore the impact of gleaning on individual gleaners and the community by documenting total amounts gleaned, individual uses of produce, and self-reported benefits and barriers to gleaning. During the 1997 season, ~50 gleaners participated in the Pierce County Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program Gleaning Project; 29 participated in an intensive 4-week study to track use of produce by gleaners. Onsite weighing of gleaned produce revealed that of the 110,000 pounds gleaned by these 50 gleaners from Pierce County farms and orchards during 1997, 85,000 pounds (77%) were donated to local emergency food programs; 25,000 pounds (23%) were taken home by gleaners. Of the produce taken home by the 29 study participants, an estimated 9% was used fresh, 48% was preserved for later user, and 43% was shared with others. During a combination of telephone and in-person interviews, gleaners reported using more fresh produce and sharing knowledge about gardening and food preservation. The most important benefits of gleaning were “stretching my food budget” and “helping provide food for the community.” Detailed exploration of the impact of gleaned produce on dietary patterns and use of validated food security measures is warranted considering the volume of produce used fresh, preserved for later use, and given away by gleaning participants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信