鉴定《史记》的文本来源:回顾过去的研究，以获得更全面的方法论

IF 0.3 3区社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES

Early China Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1017/eac.2018.10

Trever 其濬 McKay 余

{"title":"鉴定《史记》的文本来源:回顾过去的研究，以获得更全面的方法论","authors":"Trever 其濬 McKay 余","doi":"10.1017/eac.2018.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While many aspects of Shi ji authorship are either unknown or speculative, the source texts of Shi ji and Sima Qian's use of them are viable yet underexplored paths to a deeper understanding of this monumental work. From the 1920s to the present, seven scholars from China, Japan, and Taiwan have attempted to ascertain the extent of Sima Qian's textual perusals and adaptations by compiling bibliographies of Shi ji source texts. This article compiles some of their results for comparison and analysis. From this, principles are highlighted for generating a more comprehensive methodology. 提要有關《史記》作者的各個層面，目前仍有許多無法澄清之處，儘管如此，《史記》的文獻來源與司馬遷如何採用這些文獻二事尚有可探討之餘地。自 1920 年代至今，前後有七位來自中、日、臺的學者分別列出司馬遷編纂《史記》所參見、引用的書單。本文彙集他們的一些成果來加以分析、比較，目的是彰顯一些基本原則可用以編纂更全面的書目，進而對這本傑作有更深入的瞭解。","PeriodicalId":11463,"journal":{"name":"Early China","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2018.10","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IDENTIFYING THE TEXTUAL SOURCES OF SHI JI: REVIEWING PAST RESEARCH FOR A MORE ENCOMPASSING METHODOLOGY\",\"authors\":\"Trever 其濬 McKay 余\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/eac.2018.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract While many aspects of Shi ji authorship are either unknown or speculative, the source texts of Shi ji and Sima Qian's use of them are viable yet underexplored paths to a deeper understanding of this monumental work. From the 1920s to the present, seven scholars from China, Japan, and Taiwan have attempted to ascertain the extent of Sima Qian's textual perusals and adaptations by compiling bibliographies of Shi ji source texts. This article compiles some of their results for comparison and analysis. From this, principles are highlighted for generating a more comprehensive methodology. 提要有關《史記》作者的各個層面，目前仍有許多無法澄清之處，儘管如此，《史記》的文獻來源與司馬遷如何採用這些文獻二事尚有可探討之餘地。自 1920 年代至今，前後有七位來自中、日、臺的學者分別列出司馬遷編纂《史記》所參見、引用的書單。本文彙集他們的一些成果來加以分析、比較，目的是彰顯一些基本原則可用以編纂更全面的書目，進而對這本傑作有更深入的瞭解。\",\"PeriodicalId\":11463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early China\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/eac.2018.10\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2018.10\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2018.10","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

Abstract While many aspects of Shi ji authorship are either unknown or speculative, the source texts of Shi ji and Sima Qian's use of them are viable yet underexplored paths to a deeper understanding of this monumental work. From the 1920s to the present, seven scholars from China, Japan, and Taiwan have attempted to ascertain the extent of Sima Qian's textual perusals and adaptations by compiling bibliographies of Shi ji source texts. This article compiles some of their results for comparison and analysis. From this, principles are highlighted for generating a more comprehensive methodology. 提要有关《史记》作者的各个层面，目前仍有许多无法澄清之处，尽管如此，《史记》的文献来源与司马迁如何采用这些文献二事尚有可探讨之余地。自 1920 年代至今，前后有七位来自中、日、台的学者分别列出司马迁编纂《史记》所参见、引用的书单。本文汇集他们的一些成果来加以分析、比较，目的是彰显一些基本原则可用以编纂更全面的书目，进而对这本杰作有更深入的了解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

IDENTIFYING THE TEXTUAL SOURCES OF SHI JI: REVIEWING PAST RESEARCH FOR A MORE ENCOMPASSING METHODOLOGY

Abstract While many aspects of Shi ji authorship are either unknown or speculative, the source texts of Shi ji and Sima Qian's use of them are viable yet underexplored paths to a deeper understanding of this monumental work. From the 1920s to the present, seven scholars from China, Japan, and Taiwan have attempted to ascertain the extent of Sima Qian's textual perusals and adaptations by compiling bibliographies of Shi ji source texts. This article compiles some of their results for comparison and analysis. From this, principles are highlighted for generating a more comprehensive methodology. 提要有關《史記》作者的各個層面，目前仍有許多無法澄清之處，儘管如此，《史記》的文獻來源與司馬遷如何採用這些文獻二事尚有可探討之餘地。自 1920 年代至今，前後有七位來自中、日、臺的學者分別列出司馬遷編纂《史記》所參見、引用的書單。本文彙集他們的一些成果來加以分析、比較，目的是彰顯一些基本原則可用以編纂更全面的書目，進而對這本傑作有更深入的瞭解。

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Early China ASIAN STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Early China publishes original research on all aspects of the culture and civilization of China from earliest times through the Han dynasty period (CE 220). The journal is interdisciplinary in scope, including articles on Chinese archaeology, history, philosophy, religion, literature, and paleography. It is the only English-language journal to publish solely on early China, and to include information on all relevant publications in all languages. The journal is of interest to scholars of archaeology and of other ancient cultures as well as sinologists.