国家医疗补助机构质量管理的演变:对拥有综合管理医疗计划的国家的全国调查

Bruce E. Landon MD, MBA (Assistant Professor), Haiden A. Huskamp PhD (Assistant Professor), Carol Tobias MMHS (Director), Arnold M. Epstein MD, MA
{"title":"国家医疗补助机构质量管理的演变:对拥有综合管理医疗计划的国家的全国调查","authors":"Bruce E. Landon MD, MBA (Assistant Professor),&nbsp;Haiden A. Huskamp PhD (Assistant Professor),&nbsp;Carol Tobias MMHS (Director),&nbsp;Arnold M. Epstein MD, MA","doi":"10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28007-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Concern has been expressed about whether managed care health plans can successfully meet the special needs of Medicaid beneficiaries. A 1996 survey indicated that state Medicaid agencies had just begun conducting quality oversight and management. Since then the federal government has released guidelines under the Quality Improvement System for Managed Care (QISMC) program to assist states with quality management of managed care programs. In 1999 a follow-up telephone survey was conducted with representatives from 45 states to describe the current state of and changes in quality management activities by state Medicaid agencies for Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in managed care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 45 states represented a 50% increase between 1995 and 1999. The number of states enrolling the disabled had doubled (from 15 to 30). Most states collecting data on satisfaction and childhood immunizations fed it back to health plans, although feedback of other measures of access and quality occurred less frequently and fewer states provided information to beneficiaries choosing health plans. Fewer than 25% of states reported having even one health plan demonstrate improvement in individual measures of access and quality except for prenatal care (28%) and childhood immunizations (33%). Fewer than half of the states included contractual penalties in their contracts with health plans, and very few (three or fewer per penalty) had ever invoked such penalties.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>State Medicaid agencies continue to adapt to their new roles as value-based purchasers of health care. Although increasing numbers of states collect data on satisfaction, access, and quality of care, few states have been able to document improved performance in the health plans they oversee.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79382,"journal":{"name":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 72-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28007-4","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of Quality Management in State Medicaid Agencies: A National Survey of States with Comprehensive Managed Care Programs\",\"authors\":\"Bruce E. Landon MD, MBA (Assistant Professor),&nbsp;Haiden A. Huskamp PhD (Assistant Professor),&nbsp;Carol Tobias MMHS (Director),&nbsp;Arnold M. Epstein MD, MA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28007-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Concern has been expressed about whether managed care health plans can successfully meet the special needs of Medicaid beneficiaries. A 1996 survey indicated that state Medicaid agencies had just begun conducting quality oversight and management. Since then the federal government has released guidelines under the Quality Improvement System for Managed Care (QISMC) program to assist states with quality management of managed care programs. In 1999 a follow-up telephone survey was conducted with representatives from 45 states to describe the current state of and changes in quality management activities by state Medicaid agencies for Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in managed care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 45 states represented a 50% increase between 1995 and 1999. The number of states enrolling the disabled had doubled (from 15 to 30). Most states collecting data on satisfaction and childhood immunizations fed it back to health plans, although feedback of other measures of access and quality occurred less frequently and fewer states provided information to beneficiaries choosing health plans. Fewer than 25% of states reported having even one health plan demonstrate improvement in individual measures of access and quality except for prenatal care (28%) and childhood immunizations (33%). Fewer than half of the states included contractual penalties in their contracts with health plans, and very few (three or fewer per penalty) had ever invoked such penalties.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>State Medicaid agencies continue to adapt to their new roles as value-based purchasers of health care. Although increasing numbers of states collect data on satisfaction, access, and quality of care, few states have been able to document improved performance in the health plans they oversee.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 72-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28007-4\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324102280074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324102280074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

管理式医疗保健计划是否能够成功满足医疗补助受益人的特殊需求,已经引起了关注。1996年的一项调查表明,州医疗补助机构刚刚开始进行质量监督和管理。从那时起,联邦政府发布了管理式医疗质量改进体系(QISMC)计划的指导方针,以协助各州对管理式医疗项目进行质量管理。1999年,对来自45个州的代表进行了一项后续电话调查,以描述州医疗补助机构为医疗补助受益人登记管理医疗的质量管理活动的现状和变化。结果这45个州在1995年至1999年间增加了50%。招收残疾人的州增加了一倍(从15个增加到30个)。大多数州收集关于满意度和儿童免疫接种的数据,并将其反馈给健康计划,尽管对其他获取和质量措施的反馈发生的频率较低,向选择健康计划的受益人提供信息的州也较少。只有不到25%的州报告说,即使有一项保健计划,也表明除了产前护理(28%)和儿童免疫接种(33%)之外,在获取和质量方面的个别措施有所改善。不到一半的州在医疗计划合同中纳入了合同处罚,而且很少有州(每次处罚少于三个)曾援引过这种处罚。结论:国家医疗补助机构继续适应其作为基于价值的医疗保健购买者的新角色。尽管越来越多的州收集满意度、可获得性和护理质量的数据,但很少有州能够记录其监督的健康计划的改进表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evolution of Quality Management in State Medicaid Agencies: A National Survey of States with Comprehensive Managed Care Programs

Background

Concern has been expressed about whether managed care health plans can successfully meet the special needs of Medicaid beneficiaries. A 1996 survey indicated that state Medicaid agencies had just begun conducting quality oversight and management. Since then the federal government has released guidelines under the Quality Improvement System for Managed Care (QISMC) program to assist states with quality management of managed care programs. In 1999 a follow-up telephone survey was conducted with representatives from 45 states to describe the current state of and changes in quality management activities by state Medicaid agencies for Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in managed care.

Results

The 45 states represented a 50% increase between 1995 and 1999. The number of states enrolling the disabled had doubled (from 15 to 30). Most states collecting data on satisfaction and childhood immunizations fed it back to health plans, although feedback of other measures of access and quality occurred less frequently and fewer states provided information to beneficiaries choosing health plans. Fewer than 25% of states reported having even one health plan demonstrate improvement in individual measures of access and quality except for prenatal care (28%) and childhood immunizations (33%). Fewer than half of the states included contractual penalties in their contracts with health plans, and very few (three or fewer per penalty) had ever invoked such penalties.

Conclusions

State Medicaid agencies continue to adapt to their new roles as value-based purchasers of health care. Although increasing numbers of states collect data on satisfaction, access, and quality of care, few states have been able to document improved performance in the health plans they oversee.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信