Bruce E. Landon MD, MBA (Assistant Professor), Haiden A. Huskamp PhD (Assistant Professor), Carol Tobias MMHS (Director), Arnold M. Epstein MD, MA
{"title":"国家医疗补助机构质量管理的演变:对拥有综合管理医疗计划的国家的全国调查","authors":"Bruce E. Landon MD, MBA (Assistant Professor), Haiden A. Huskamp PhD (Assistant Professor), Carol Tobias MMHS (Director), Arnold M. Epstein MD, MA","doi":"10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28007-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Concern has been expressed about whether managed care health plans can successfully meet the special needs of Medicaid beneficiaries. A 1996 survey indicated that state Medicaid agencies had just begun conducting quality oversight and management. Since then the federal government has released guidelines under the Quality Improvement System for Managed Care (QISMC) program to assist states with quality management of managed care programs. In 1999 a follow-up telephone survey was conducted with representatives from 45 states to describe the current state of and changes in quality management activities by state Medicaid agencies for Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in managed care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 45 states represented a 50% increase between 1995 and 1999. The number of states enrolling the disabled had doubled (from 15 to 30). Most states collecting data on satisfaction and childhood immunizations fed it back to health plans, although feedback of other measures of access and quality occurred less frequently and fewer states provided information to beneficiaries choosing health plans. Fewer than 25% of states reported having even one health plan demonstrate improvement in individual measures of access and quality except for prenatal care (28%) and childhood immunizations (33%). Fewer than half of the states included contractual penalties in their contracts with health plans, and very few (three or fewer per penalty) had ever invoked such penalties.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>State Medicaid agencies continue to adapt to their new roles as value-based purchasers of health care. Although increasing numbers of states collect data on satisfaction, access, and quality of care, few states have been able to document improved performance in the health plans they oversee.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79382,"journal":{"name":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","volume":"28 2","pages":"Pages 72-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28007-4","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of Quality Management in State Medicaid Agencies: A National Survey of States with Comprehensive Managed Care Programs\",\"authors\":\"Bruce E. Landon MD, MBA (Assistant Professor), Haiden A. Huskamp PhD (Assistant Professor), Carol Tobias MMHS (Director), Arnold M. Epstein MD, MA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28007-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Concern has been expressed about whether managed care health plans can successfully meet the special needs of Medicaid beneficiaries. A 1996 survey indicated that state Medicaid agencies had just begun conducting quality oversight and management. Since then the federal government has released guidelines under the Quality Improvement System for Managed Care (QISMC) program to assist states with quality management of managed care programs. In 1999 a follow-up telephone survey was conducted with representatives from 45 states to describe the current state of and changes in quality management activities by state Medicaid agencies for Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in managed care.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 45 states represented a 50% increase between 1995 and 1999. The number of states enrolling the disabled had doubled (from 15 to 30). Most states collecting data on satisfaction and childhood immunizations fed it back to health plans, although feedback of other measures of access and quality occurred less frequently and fewer states provided information to beneficiaries choosing health plans. Fewer than 25% of states reported having even one health plan demonstrate improvement in individual measures of access and quality except for prenatal care (28%) and childhood immunizations (33%). Fewer than half of the states included contractual penalties in their contracts with health plans, and very few (three or fewer per penalty) had ever invoked such penalties.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>State Medicaid agencies continue to adapt to their new roles as value-based purchasers of health care. Although increasing numbers of states collect data on satisfaction, access, and quality of care, few states have been able to document improved performance in the health plans they oversee.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 72-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28007-4\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324102280074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324102280074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Evolution of Quality Management in State Medicaid Agencies: A National Survey of States with Comprehensive Managed Care Programs
Background
Concern has been expressed about whether managed care health plans can successfully meet the special needs of Medicaid beneficiaries. A 1996 survey indicated that state Medicaid agencies had just begun conducting quality oversight and management. Since then the federal government has released guidelines under the Quality Improvement System for Managed Care (QISMC) program to assist states with quality management of managed care programs. In 1999 a follow-up telephone survey was conducted with representatives from 45 states to describe the current state of and changes in quality management activities by state Medicaid agencies for Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in managed care.
Results
The 45 states represented a 50% increase between 1995 and 1999. The number of states enrolling the disabled had doubled (from 15 to 30). Most states collecting data on satisfaction and childhood immunizations fed it back to health plans, although feedback of other measures of access and quality occurred less frequently and fewer states provided information to beneficiaries choosing health plans. Fewer than 25% of states reported having even one health plan demonstrate improvement in individual measures of access and quality except for prenatal care (28%) and childhood immunizations (33%). Fewer than half of the states included contractual penalties in their contracts with health plans, and very few (three or fewer per penalty) had ever invoked such penalties.
Conclusions
State Medicaid agencies continue to adapt to their new roles as value-based purchasers of health care. Although increasing numbers of states collect data on satisfaction, access, and quality of care, few states have been able to document improved performance in the health plans they oversee.