健康的医疗工作场所能提供更高质量的医疗服务吗?

John M. Eisenberg MD (Director), Candice C. Bowman PhD, RN, Nancy E. Foster (Coordinator for Quality Initiatives)
{"title":"健康的医疗工作场所能提供更高质量的医疗服务吗?","authors":"John M. Eisenberg MD (Director),&nbsp;Candice C. Bowman PhD, RN,&nbsp;Nancy E. Foster (Coordinator for Quality Initiatives)","doi":"10.1016/S1070-3241(01)27039-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The multiagency Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC) coordinates activities and plans for quality measurement and improvement across all the U.S. federal agencies involved in health care. One of its working groups focuses on the health care workforce and ways to improve the quality of care that it provides. In October 1999 four government agencies, under the aegis of the QuIC, convened a conference to examine how health care workplace quality influences the quality of care. A healthy workplace is one in which workers will be able to deliver higher-quality care and in which worker health and patients’ high-quality care are mutually supportive. In October 2000 a follow-up conference was held to focus on a specific aspect of health care quality— patient safety.</p></div><div><h3>What we still need to know</h3><p>Although enough is known to justify some initiatives to improve the quality of the health care workplace, participants in both meetings agreed that the evidence to prove these associations is weak and that there has been too little research to evaluate the impact of interventions intended to improve quality through improvements in the health care workplace. New evidence-based information is needed to test the theory of the nature of the relationship between working conditions and care quality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The tradition of evidence-based decision making needs to be applied to health care management as it has in medicine and nursing, to show how staffing, environment, organization, and culture can each can affect the quality of care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79382,"journal":{"name":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","volume":"27 9","pages":"Pages 444-457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(01)27039-4","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a Healthy Health Care Workplace Produce Higher-Quality Care?\",\"authors\":\"John M. Eisenberg MD (Director),&nbsp;Candice C. Bowman PhD, RN,&nbsp;Nancy E. Foster (Coordinator for Quality Initiatives)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1070-3241(01)27039-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The multiagency Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC) coordinates activities and plans for quality measurement and improvement across all the U.S. federal agencies involved in health care. One of its working groups focuses on the health care workforce and ways to improve the quality of care that it provides. In October 1999 four government agencies, under the aegis of the QuIC, convened a conference to examine how health care workplace quality influences the quality of care. A healthy workplace is one in which workers will be able to deliver higher-quality care and in which worker health and patients’ high-quality care are mutually supportive. In October 2000 a follow-up conference was held to focus on a specific aspect of health care quality— patient safety.</p></div><div><h3>What we still need to know</h3><p>Although enough is known to justify some initiatives to improve the quality of the health care workplace, participants in both meetings agreed that the evidence to prove these associations is weak and that there has been too little research to evaluate the impact of interventions intended to improve quality through improvements in the health care workplace. New evidence-based information is needed to test the theory of the nature of the relationship between working conditions and care quality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The tradition of evidence-based decision making needs to be applied to health care management as it has in medicine and nursing, to show how staffing, environment, organization, and culture can each can affect the quality of care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement\",\"volume\":\"27 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 444-457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(01)27039-4\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324101270394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324101270394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

多机构质量跨机构协调工作组(QuIC)协调所有涉及卫生保健的美国联邦机构的质量测量和改进活动和计划。其中一个工作组侧重于卫生保健工作人员及其改善其提供的保健质量的方法。1999年10月,在全国卫生保健委员会的主持下,四个政府机构召开了一次会议,审查保健工作场所的质量如何影响保健质量。在一个健康的工作场所,工作人员能够提供更高质量的护理,工作人员的健康和患者的高质量护理相互支持。2000年10月举行了一次后续会议,重点讨论保健质量的一个具体方面——病人安全。我们还需要知道什么尽管我们已经知道有足够的证据来证明一些改善医疗工作场所质量的举措是合理的,但两次会议的与会者都认为,证明这些关联的证据很薄弱,而且通过改善医疗工作场所来提高质量的干预措施的影响评估研究太少。需要新的基于证据的信息来检验工作条件和护理质量之间关系的本质理论。结论循证决策的传统需要像在医学和护理中一样应用于卫生保健管理,以显示人员配置、环境、组织和文化如何影响护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does a Healthy Health Care Workplace Produce Higher-Quality Care?

Background

The multiagency Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force (QuIC) coordinates activities and plans for quality measurement and improvement across all the U.S. federal agencies involved in health care. One of its working groups focuses on the health care workforce and ways to improve the quality of care that it provides. In October 1999 four government agencies, under the aegis of the QuIC, convened a conference to examine how health care workplace quality influences the quality of care. A healthy workplace is one in which workers will be able to deliver higher-quality care and in which worker health and patients’ high-quality care are mutually supportive. In October 2000 a follow-up conference was held to focus on a specific aspect of health care quality— patient safety.

What we still need to know

Although enough is known to justify some initiatives to improve the quality of the health care workplace, participants in both meetings agreed that the evidence to prove these associations is weak and that there has been too little research to evaluate the impact of interventions intended to improve quality through improvements in the health care workplace. New evidence-based information is needed to test the theory of the nature of the relationship between working conditions and care quality.

Conclusion

The tradition of evidence-based decision making needs to be applied to health care management as it has in medicine and nursing, to show how staffing, environment, organization, and culture can each can affect the quality of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信