{"title":"形成性评价和总结性评价:绩效评估中的相关问题","authors":"Joseph S. Wholey","doi":"10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90019-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wholey first defines “performance measurement” and then explains how it can serve both formative and summative evaluation functions. He also offers the view that formative evaluation is typically more useful than summative for governmental purposes, and that performance measurement is more useful than one-shot evaluations (of either formative or summative stripe). Challenges to evaluators wishing to contribute to performance measurement methodology are outlined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84713,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation practice","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 145-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90019-7","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formative and summative evaluation: Related issues in performance measurement\",\"authors\":\"Joseph S. Wholey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90019-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Wholey first defines “performance measurement” and then explains how it can serve both formative and summative evaluation functions. He also offers the view that formative evaluation is typically more useful than summative for governmental purposes, and that performance measurement is more useful than one-shot evaluations (of either formative or summative stripe). Challenges to evaluators wishing to contribute to performance measurement methodology are outlined.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation practice\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 145-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90019-7\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163396900197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163396900197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Formative and summative evaluation: Related issues in performance measurement
Wholey first defines “performance measurement” and then explains how it can serve both formative and summative evaluation functions. He also offers the view that formative evaluation is typically more useful than summative for governmental purposes, and that performance measurement is more useful than one-shot evaluations (of either formative or summative stripe). Challenges to evaluators wishing to contribute to performance measurement methodology are outlined.