形成性评价和总结性评价:绩效评估中的相关问题

Joseph S. Wholey
{"title":"形成性评价和总结性评价:绩效评估中的相关问题","authors":"Joseph S. Wholey","doi":"10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90019-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wholey first defines “performance measurement” and then explains how it can serve both formative and summative evaluation functions. He also offers the view that formative evaluation is typically more useful than summative for governmental purposes, and that performance measurement is more useful than one-shot evaluations (of either formative or summative stripe). Challenges to evaluators wishing to contribute to performance measurement methodology are outlined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84713,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation practice","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 145-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90019-7","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formative and summative evaluation: Related issues in performance measurement\",\"authors\":\"Joseph S. Wholey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90019-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Wholey first defines “performance measurement” and then explains how it can serve both formative and summative evaluation functions. He also offers the view that formative evaluation is typically more useful than summative for governmental purposes, and that performance measurement is more useful than one-shot evaluations (of either formative or summative stripe). Challenges to evaluators wishing to contribute to performance measurement methodology are outlined.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation practice\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 145-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0886-1633(96)90019-7\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163396900197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886163396900197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

Wholey首先定义了“绩效评估”,然后解释了它如何同时服务于形成性和总结性评估功能。他还提出了这样一种观点,即对于政府目的而言,形成性评估通常比总结性评估更有用,而绩效评估比一次性评估(无论是形成性评估还是总结性评估)更有用。概述了希望为绩效评估方法做出贡献的评估人员所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formative and summative evaluation: Related issues in performance measurement

Wholey first defines “performance measurement” and then explains how it can serve both formative and summative evaluation functions. He also offers the view that formative evaluation is typically more useful than summative for governmental purposes, and that performance measurement is more useful than one-shot evaluations (of either formative or summative stripe). Challenges to evaluators wishing to contribute to performance measurement methodology are outlined.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信