Donna Ciliska , Elizabeth Miles , Mary Ann O’brien , Cathy Turl , Helen Hale Tomasik , Ursula Donovan , Joanne Beyers
{"title":"以社区为基础的增加水果和蔬菜消费干预措施的有效性","authors":"Donna Ciliska , Elizabeth Miles , Mary Ann O’brien , Cathy Turl , Helen Hale Tomasik , Ursula Donovan , Joanne Beyers","doi":"10.1016/S0022-3182(00)70594-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review sought to answer the question what is the effectiveness of community-based interventions to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in people 4 years of age and older? A search was conducted through electronic databases, hand-searching, and retrieval from reference lists. Each article retrieved was rated for relevance and validity by two independent readers, and then data abstraction was done by two people for the studies that were rated as strong or moderate. One hundred and eighty-nine articles were retrieved. Sixty were rated as relevant. After validity rating, one was rated “strong,” 17 “moderate,“ and 42 “weak.” Four studies were targeted to parents of young children, six to school-aged children, and five to adults. The most effective interventions gave clear messages about increasing fruit and vegetable consumption; incorporated multiple strategies that reinforced the messages; involved the family; were more intensive; were provided over a longer period of time, rather than one or two contacts; and were based on a theoretical framework. People in public health positions or making decisions about nutrition interventions need to give priority to those interventions that are multipronged, flexible, open to input from target groups, and theoretically based.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nutrition education","volume":"32 6","pages":"Pages 341-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0022-3182(00)70594-2","citationCount":"112","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Community-Based Interventions to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption\",\"authors\":\"Donna Ciliska , Elizabeth Miles , Mary Ann O’brien , Cathy Turl , Helen Hale Tomasik , Ursula Donovan , Joanne Beyers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0022-3182(00)70594-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This systematic review sought to answer the question what is the effectiveness of community-based interventions to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in people 4 years of age and older? A search was conducted through electronic databases, hand-searching, and retrieval from reference lists. Each article retrieved was rated for relevance and validity by two independent readers, and then data abstraction was done by two people for the studies that were rated as strong or moderate. One hundred and eighty-nine articles were retrieved. Sixty were rated as relevant. After validity rating, one was rated “strong,” 17 “moderate,“ and 42 “weak.” Four studies were targeted to parents of young children, six to school-aged children, and five to adults. The most effective interventions gave clear messages about increasing fruit and vegetable consumption; incorporated multiple strategies that reinforced the messages; involved the family; were more intensive; were provided over a longer period of time, rather than one or two contacts; and were based on a theoretical framework. People in public health positions or making decisions about nutrition interventions need to give priority to those interventions that are multipronged, flexible, open to input from target groups, and theoretically based.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nutrition education\",\"volume\":\"32 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 341-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0022-3182(00)70594-2\",\"citationCount\":\"112\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nutrition education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022318200705942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nutrition education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022318200705942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of Community-Based Interventions to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
This systematic review sought to answer the question what is the effectiveness of community-based interventions to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in people 4 years of age and older? A search was conducted through electronic databases, hand-searching, and retrieval from reference lists. Each article retrieved was rated for relevance and validity by two independent readers, and then data abstraction was done by two people for the studies that were rated as strong or moderate. One hundred and eighty-nine articles were retrieved. Sixty were rated as relevant. After validity rating, one was rated “strong,” 17 “moderate,“ and 42 “weak.” Four studies were targeted to parents of young children, six to school-aged children, and five to adults. The most effective interventions gave clear messages about increasing fruit and vegetable consumption; incorporated multiple strategies that reinforced the messages; involved the family; were more intensive; were provided over a longer period of time, rather than one or two contacts; and were based on a theoretical framework. People in public health positions or making decisions about nutrition interventions need to give priority to those interventions that are multipronged, flexible, open to input from target groups, and theoretically based.