CLARIPED:儿科急诊风险分类的新工具

Maria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa , Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa , Antonio José Ledo Alves da Cunha , Cláudia de Souza Lopes
{"title":"CLARIPED:儿科急诊风险分类的新工具","authors":"Maria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa ,&nbsp;Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa ,&nbsp;Antonio José Ledo Alves da Cunha ,&nbsp;Cláudia de Souza Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To present a new pediatric risk classification tool, CLARIPED, and describe its development steps.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Development steps: (i) first round of discussion among experts, first prototype; (ii) pre-test of reliability, 36 hypothetical cases; (iii) second round of discussion to perform adjustments; (iv) team training; (v) pre-test with patients in real time; (vi) third round of discussion to perform new adjustments; (vii) final pre-test of validity (20% of medical treatments in five days).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CLARIPED features five urgency categories: Red (Emergency), Orange (very urgent), Yellow (urgent), Green (little urgent) and Blue (not urgent). The first classification step includes the measurement of four vital signs (VIPE score); the second step consists in the urgency discrimination assessment. Each step results in assigning a color, selecting the most urgent one for the final classification. Each color corresponds to a maximum waiting time for medical care and referral to the most appropriate physical area for the patient's clinical condition. The interobserver agreement was substantial (kappa=0.79) and the final pre-test, with 82 medical treatments, showed good correlation between the proportion of patients in each urgency category and the number of used resources (<em>p</em>&lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CLARIPED is an objective and easy-to-use tool for simple risk classification, of which pre-tests suggest good reliability and validity. Larger-scale studies on its validity and reliability in different health contexts are ongoing and can contribute to the implementation of a nationwide pediatric risk classification system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101120,"journal":{"name":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 254-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.002","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CLARIPED: a new tool for risk classification in pediatric emergencies\",\"authors\":\"Maria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa ,&nbsp;Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa ,&nbsp;Antonio José Ledo Alves da Cunha ,&nbsp;Cláudia de Souza Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To present a new pediatric risk classification tool, CLARIPED, and describe its development steps.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Development steps: (i) first round of discussion among experts, first prototype; (ii) pre-test of reliability, 36 hypothetical cases; (iii) second round of discussion to perform adjustments; (iv) team training; (v) pre-test with patients in real time; (vi) third round of discussion to perform new adjustments; (vii) final pre-test of validity (20% of medical treatments in five days).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CLARIPED features five urgency categories: Red (Emergency), Orange (very urgent), Yellow (urgent), Green (little urgent) and Blue (not urgent). The first classification step includes the measurement of four vital signs (VIPE score); the second step consists in the urgency discrimination assessment. Each step results in assigning a color, selecting the most urgent one for the final classification. Each color corresponds to a maximum waiting time for medical care and referral to the most appropriate physical area for the patient's clinical condition. The interobserver agreement was substantial (kappa=0.79) and the final pre-test, with 82 medical treatments, showed good correlation between the proportion of patients in each urgency category and the number of used resources (<em>p</em>&lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>CLARIPED is an objective and easy-to-use tool for simple risk classification, of which pre-tests suggest good reliability and validity. Larger-scale studies on its validity and reliability in different health contexts are ongoing and can contribute to the implementation of a nationwide pediatric risk classification system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 254-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.002\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2359348216000117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2359348216000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的介绍一种新的儿童风险分类工具clarped,并描述其发展过程。开发步骤:(i)第一轮专家讨论,第一个原型;(ii)信度预测试,36个假设案例;(三)第二轮讨论进行调整;(四)团队培训;(v)对患者进行实时预测;(六)第三轮讨论进行新的调整;(七)效度最后预测试(5天内治疗的20%)。结果clarped有五个紧急类别:红色(紧急),橙色(非常紧急),黄色(紧急),绿色(不紧急)和蓝色(不紧急)。第一步分类包括四项生命体征(VIPE评分)的测量;第二步是紧急性鉴别评估。每一步的结果是分配一种颜色,选择最紧急的颜色作为最后的分类。每一种颜色对应的最长等待时间为医疗护理和转诊到最适当的物理区域的病人的临床状况。观察者之间的一致是实质性的(kappa=0.79),最终的预测试,包括82种药物治疗,显示每个紧急类别的患者比例与使用的资源数量之间存在良好的相关性(p<0.001)。结论clarped是一种客观、简便的风险分类工具,预试结果具有良好的信效度。对其在不同健康背景下的有效性和可靠性的大规模研究正在进行中,并有助于实施全国儿科风险分类系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CLARIPED: a new tool for risk classification in pediatric emergencies

Objective

To present a new pediatric risk classification tool, CLARIPED, and describe its development steps.

Methods

Development steps: (i) first round of discussion among experts, first prototype; (ii) pre-test of reliability, 36 hypothetical cases; (iii) second round of discussion to perform adjustments; (iv) team training; (v) pre-test with patients in real time; (vi) third round of discussion to perform new adjustments; (vii) final pre-test of validity (20% of medical treatments in five days).

Results

CLARIPED features five urgency categories: Red (Emergency), Orange (very urgent), Yellow (urgent), Green (little urgent) and Blue (not urgent). The first classification step includes the measurement of four vital signs (VIPE score); the second step consists in the urgency discrimination assessment. Each step results in assigning a color, selecting the most urgent one for the final classification. Each color corresponds to a maximum waiting time for medical care and referral to the most appropriate physical area for the patient's clinical condition. The interobserver agreement was substantial (kappa=0.79) and the final pre-test, with 82 medical treatments, showed good correlation between the proportion of patients in each urgency category and the number of used resources (p<0.001).

Conclusions

CLARIPED is an objective and easy-to-use tool for simple risk classification, of which pre-tests suggest good reliability and validity. Larger-scale studies on its validity and reliability in different health contexts are ongoing and can contribute to the implementation of a nationwide pediatric risk classification system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信