{"title":"这是爱因斯坦奇迹年的转折点","authors":"Robert Rynasiewicz , Jürgen Renn","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The year 1905 has been called Einstein's <em>Annus mirabilis</em><span> because of three ground-breaking works completed over the span of a few months—the light-quantum paper, the Brownian motion paper, and the paper on the electrodynamics of moving bodies introducing the special theory of relativity. There are </span><em>prima facie</em> reasons for thinking that the origins of these papers cannot be understood in isolation from one another. Due to space limitations, we concentrate primarily on the light quantum paper, since, in key respects, it marks the turning point for the <em>Annus mirabilis</em>. The task is to probe, not just how the idea of the light quantum might have occurred to Einstein, but, more importantly, what convinced him that the idea was not just a quixotic hypothesis, but an unavoidable and demonstrable feature of radiation. The crucial development, we suggest, arose from comparing the energy fluctuations that follow rigorously from the Stefan–Boltzmann law, as well as from Wien's distribution formula for blackbody radiation, with what it is reasonable to expect from Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light. A special case of this is addressed in Einstein's one paper from 1904, “Zur allgemeinen molekularen Theorie der Wärme”. <em>Annalen der Physik</em>, <em>14</em>, 355–362 (Also in CPAE, Vol. 2, Doc. 5)]. The outcome for the general case leads naturally to the central theoretical argument of the light quantum paper, the expectation of Brownian-like motion, and several of the key results for the electrodynamics of moving bodies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54442,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","volume":"37 1","pages":"Pages 5-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.12.002","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The turning point for Einstein's Annus mirabilis\",\"authors\":\"Robert Rynasiewicz , Jürgen Renn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The year 1905 has been called Einstein's <em>Annus mirabilis</em><span> because of three ground-breaking works completed over the span of a few months—the light-quantum paper, the Brownian motion paper, and the paper on the electrodynamics of moving bodies introducing the special theory of relativity. There are </span><em>prima facie</em> reasons for thinking that the origins of these papers cannot be understood in isolation from one another. Due to space limitations, we concentrate primarily on the light quantum paper, since, in key respects, it marks the turning point for the <em>Annus mirabilis</em>. The task is to probe, not just how the idea of the light quantum might have occurred to Einstein, but, more importantly, what convinced him that the idea was not just a quixotic hypothesis, but an unavoidable and demonstrable feature of radiation. The crucial development, we suggest, arose from comparing the energy fluctuations that follow rigorously from the Stefan–Boltzmann law, as well as from Wien's distribution formula for blackbody radiation, with what it is reasonable to expect from Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light. A special case of this is addressed in Einstein's one paper from 1904, “Zur allgemeinen molekularen Theorie der Wärme”. <em>Annalen der Physik</em>, <em>14</em>, 355–362 (Also in CPAE, Vol. 2, Doc. 5)]. The outcome for the general case leads naturally to the central theoretical argument of the light quantum paper, the expectation of Brownian-like motion, and several of the key results for the electrodynamics of moving bodies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 5-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.shpsb.2005.12.002\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219805000961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219805000961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
摘要
1905年被称为爱因斯坦的奇迹年,因为他在几个月内完成了三项突破性的工作——光量子论文、布朗运动论文和介绍狭义相对论的关于运动物体电动力学的论文。有初步的理由认为,这些论文的起源不能孤立地理解彼此。由于篇幅限制,我们主要集中在光量子纸上,因为在关键方面,它标志着奇迹之年的转折点。我们的任务不仅是探究爱因斯坦是如何想到光量子的,更重要的是,是什么让他相信这个想法不仅仅是一个不切实际的假设,而是辐射不可避免的、可以证明的特征。我们认为,关键的发展源于将严格遵循斯蒂芬-玻尔兹曼定律以及维恩黑体辐射分布公式的能量波动与麦克斯韦光的电磁理论的合理预期进行比较。爱因斯坦在1904年的一篇论文《Zur allgemeinen molularen Theorie der Wärme》中提到了这种情况的一个特例。物理学报,14,355-362(也见于CPAE, Vol. 2, Doc. 5)。一般情况下的结果自然引出了光量子论文的核心理论论点,类布朗运动的期望,以及运动物体电动力学的几个关键结果。
The year 1905 has been called Einstein's Annus mirabilis because of three ground-breaking works completed over the span of a few months—the light-quantum paper, the Brownian motion paper, and the paper on the electrodynamics of moving bodies introducing the special theory of relativity. There are prima facie reasons for thinking that the origins of these papers cannot be understood in isolation from one another. Due to space limitations, we concentrate primarily on the light quantum paper, since, in key respects, it marks the turning point for the Annus mirabilis. The task is to probe, not just how the idea of the light quantum might have occurred to Einstein, but, more importantly, what convinced him that the idea was not just a quixotic hypothesis, but an unavoidable and demonstrable feature of radiation. The crucial development, we suggest, arose from comparing the energy fluctuations that follow rigorously from the Stefan–Boltzmann law, as well as from Wien's distribution formula for blackbody radiation, with what it is reasonable to expect from Maxwell's electromagnetic theory of light. A special case of this is addressed in Einstein's one paper from 1904, “Zur allgemeinen molekularen Theorie der Wärme”. Annalen der Physik, 14, 355–362 (Also in CPAE, Vol. 2, Doc. 5)]. The outcome for the general case leads naturally to the central theoretical argument of the light quantum paper, the expectation of Brownian-like motion, and several of the key results for the electrodynamics of moving bodies.
期刊介绍:
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics is devoted to all aspects of the history and philosophy of modern physics broadly understood, including physical aspects of astronomy, chemistry and other non-biological sciences. The primary focus is on physics from the mid/late-nineteenth century to the present, the period of emergence of the kind of theoretical physics that has come to dominate the exact sciences in the twentieth century. The journal is internationally oriented with contributions from a wide range of perspectives. In addition to purely historical or philosophical papers, the editors particularly encourage papers that combine these two disciplines.
The editors are also keen to publish papers of interest to physicists, as well as specialists in history and philosophy of physics.