美国、英国和中国对非洲金融市场冲击的溢出效应分析

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Giorgia Giovannetti , Margherita Velucchi
{"title":"美国、英国和中国对非洲金融市场冲击的溢出效应分析","authors":"Giorgia Giovannetti ,&nbsp;Margherita Velucchi","doi":"10.1016/j.rdf.2013.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emerging African financial markets have been recently put forward as an interesting and profitable alternative to diversify risk for international investors. At the same time, they became more integrated with developed financial markets, so that, despite claims that Africa would be sheltered by outside shocks because at the margin of the globalization process, they have been hit by the 2008–09 crisis. This paper analyses the relationships among mature financial markets (US and UK), China, some South Saharan African emerging markets (Botswana, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa) and two North African countries (Egypt and Tunisia) over the period 2005–2012, focusing on the role of financial markets’ volatility. We study, with the help of a Multiplicative Error fully inter-dependent model (MEM), the dynamics of the financial market volatility (risk), and the interactions with other markets. We present impulse-response functions with a time dependent profile to describe how a volatility shock from one market may propagate to other markets, increasing the fragility of African infant financial markets. Finally, we summarise the role of different markets in propagating risk in the area using a synthetic index (Volatility Spillover Balance) that distinguishes between volatility “creators” and “absorbers”. Our results show that South Africa and US shocks significantly affect African financial markets, and China has recently become more interconnected. Furthermore, while US, Kenya and Tunisia are “net creators” of volatility spillovers, South Africa and China turn out to be net “absorbers”.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39052,"journal":{"name":"Review of Development Finance","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 169-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rdf.2013.10.002","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A spillover analysis of shocks from US, UK and China on African financial markets\",\"authors\":\"Giorgia Giovannetti ,&nbsp;Margherita Velucchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rdf.2013.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Emerging African financial markets have been recently put forward as an interesting and profitable alternative to diversify risk for international investors. At the same time, they became more integrated with developed financial markets, so that, despite claims that Africa would be sheltered by outside shocks because at the margin of the globalization process, they have been hit by the 2008–09 crisis. This paper analyses the relationships among mature financial markets (US and UK), China, some South Saharan African emerging markets (Botswana, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa) and two North African countries (Egypt and Tunisia) over the period 2005–2012, focusing on the role of financial markets’ volatility. We study, with the help of a Multiplicative Error fully inter-dependent model (MEM), the dynamics of the financial market volatility (risk), and the interactions with other markets. We present impulse-response functions with a time dependent profile to describe how a volatility shock from one market may propagate to other markets, increasing the fragility of African infant financial markets. Finally, we summarise the role of different markets in propagating risk in the area using a synthetic index (Volatility Spillover Balance) that distinguishes between volatility “creators” and “absorbers”. Our results show that South Africa and US shocks significantly affect African financial markets, and China has recently become more interconnected. Furthermore, while US, Kenya and Tunisia are “net creators” of volatility spillovers, South Africa and China turn out to be net “absorbers”.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Development Finance\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 169-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rdf.2013.10.002\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Development Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879933713000407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Development Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879933713000407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

新兴的非洲金融市场最近被提出作为国际投资者分散风险的一个有趣和有利可图的选择。与此同时,它们与发达的金融市场更加融合,因此,尽管声称非洲将受到外部冲击的保护,因为它们处于全球化进程的边缘,但它们受到了2008-09年危机的打击。本文分析了2005-2012年间成熟金融市场(美国和英国)、中国、一些撒哈拉以南非洲新兴市场(博茨瓦纳、肯尼亚、尼日利亚和南非)和两个北非国家(埃及和突尼斯)之间的关系,重点研究了金融市场波动的作用。我们利用乘数误差完全相互依赖模型(MEM)来研究金融市场波动(风险)的动态,以及与其他市场的相互作用。我们提出了具有时间依赖特征的脉冲响应函数,以描述来自一个市场的波动冲击如何传播到其他市场,从而增加非洲新兴金融市场的脆弱性。最后,我们使用一个综合指数(波动溢出平衡)总结了不同市场在该地区传播风险方面的作用,该指数区分了波动“创造者”和“吸收者”。我们的研究结果表明,南非和美国的冲击显著影响非洲金融市场,而中国最近变得更加相互关联。此外,美国、肯尼亚和突尼斯是波动性溢出效应的“净创造者”,而南非和中国则是净“吸收者”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A spillover analysis of shocks from US, UK and China on African financial markets

Emerging African financial markets have been recently put forward as an interesting and profitable alternative to diversify risk for international investors. At the same time, they became more integrated with developed financial markets, so that, despite claims that Africa would be sheltered by outside shocks because at the margin of the globalization process, they have been hit by the 2008–09 crisis. This paper analyses the relationships among mature financial markets (US and UK), China, some South Saharan African emerging markets (Botswana, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa) and two North African countries (Egypt and Tunisia) over the period 2005–2012, focusing on the role of financial markets’ volatility. We study, with the help of a Multiplicative Error fully inter-dependent model (MEM), the dynamics of the financial market volatility (risk), and the interactions with other markets. We present impulse-response functions with a time dependent profile to describe how a volatility shock from one market may propagate to other markets, increasing the fragility of African infant financial markets. Finally, we summarise the role of different markets in propagating risk in the area using a synthetic index (Volatility Spillover Balance) that distinguishes between volatility “creators” and “absorbers”. Our results show that South Africa and US shocks significantly affect African financial markets, and China has recently become more interconnected. Furthermore, while US, Kenya and Tunisia are “net creators” of volatility spillovers, South Africa and China turn out to be net “absorbers”.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Development Finance
Review of Development Finance Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信