针对百日咳毒素的替代疫苗安全检测策略

Juan L Arciniega , Laura Corvette , Henry Hsu , Freyja Lynn , Theresa Romani , Roland Dobbelaer
{"title":"针对百日咳毒素的替代疫苗安全检测策略","authors":"Juan L Arciniega ,&nbsp;Laura Corvette ,&nbsp;Henry Hsu ,&nbsp;Freyja Lynn ,&nbsp;Theresa Romani ,&nbsp;Roland Dobbelaer","doi":"10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>All acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines in use contain chemically inactivated pertussis toxin (PT). The finding that mice, naturally resistant to the effects of histamine, become sensitive upon injection of minute amounts of PT, led to the development of the test for residual PT known as the histamine sensitization assay (HSA). The HSA used by U.S.-licensed manufacturers is a limit test that shows that the residual bioactivity of PT in a single human dose of vaccine is below a threshold. Limit tests do not allow quantitative measurement. When the method is newly established at the point of use, three or more dilutions of pure PT are used to verify that mice injected with the vaccine came from a shipment that have sensitivity consistent with historical values. Sensitizability is expressed as an HSD<sub>50</sub> (the dose that sensitizes 50% of a group of mice). However, once linearity of the dose response has been demonstrated, the assay may be simplified so as to include in each test only a single control group injected with PT. This assay simplification constitutes an example of the so-called “consistency approach.” A Japanese variant of the HSA uses a drop in body temperature as a nonlethal alternative index of PT-mediated sensitization and can provide a quantitative estimate of the residual PT activity of a vaccine. However, the advantage of a quantitative method is not obvious, because the amount of PT that is unsafe for humans is unknown. In addition, although the use of a nonlethal endpoint constitutes an important refinement, the need for a reference group in the test to obtain a quantitative estimate increases the number of animals required, relative to the number used in a simplified limit test. Moreover, the nonlethal endpoint might be adapted to the limit test format, and important steps have been taken in this regard. Finally, one option under early evaluation is the possibility of using the results from two <em>in vitro</em> assays, an enzymatic activity assay and a binding assay, to replace the HSA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89221,"journal":{"name":"Procedia in vaccinology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 248-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.026","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target alternative vaccine safety testing strategies for pertussis toxin\",\"authors\":\"Juan L Arciniega ,&nbsp;Laura Corvette ,&nbsp;Henry Hsu ,&nbsp;Freyja Lynn ,&nbsp;Theresa Romani ,&nbsp;Roland Dobbelaer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>All acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines in use contain chemically inactivated pertussis toxin (PT). The finding that mice, naturally resistant to the effects of histamine, become sensitive upon injection of minute amounts of PT, led to the development of the test for residual PT known as the histamine sensitization assay (HSA). The HSA used by U.S.-licensed manufacturers is a limit test that shows that the residual bioactivity of PT in a single human dose of vaccine is below a threshold. Limit tests do not allow quantitative measurement. When the method is newly established at the point of use, three or more dilutions of pure PT are used to verify that mice injected with the vaccine came from a shipment that have sensitivity consistent with historical values. Sensitizability is expressed as an HSD<sub>50</sub> (the dose that sensitizes 50% of a group of mice). However, once linearity of the dose response has been demonstrated, the assay may be simplified so as to include in each test only a single control group injected with PT. This assay simplification constitutes an example of the so-called “consistency approach.” A Japanese variant of the HSA uses a drop in body temperature as a nonlethal alternative index of PT-mediated sensitization and can provide a quantitative estimate of the residual PT activity of a vaccine. However, the advantage of a quantitative method is not obvious, because the amount of PT that is unsafe for humans is unknown. In addition, although the use of a nonlethal endpoint constitutes an important refinement, the need for a reference group in the test to obtain a quantitative estimate increases the number of animals required, relative to the number used in a simplified limit test. Moreover, the nonlethal endpoint might be adapted to the limit test format, and important steps have been taken in this regard. Finally, one option under early evaluation is the possibility of using the results from two <em>in vitro</em> assays, an enzymatic activity assay and a binding assay, to replace the HSA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Procedia in vaccinology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 248-260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.026\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Procedia in vaccinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877282X11000440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia in vaccinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877282X11000440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

所有使用的无细胞百日咳(aP)疫苗都含有化学灭活百日咳毒素(PT)。小鼠天生对组胺的作用有抵抗力,但注射微量PT后会变得敏感,这一发现导致了对残余PT的测试,即组胺致敏试验(HSA)的发展。美国许可制造商使用的HSA是一种限量测试,表明单次人体剂量疫苗中PT的残留生物活性低于阈值。极限测试不允许定量测量。当该方法在使用点新建立时,使用三次或更多次稀释的纯PT来验证注射疫苗的小鼠来自具有与历史值一致的灵敏度的装运。致敏性以HSD50表示(致敏剂量为一组小鼠的50%)。然而,一旦剂量反应的线性被证明,该分析可以被简化,以便在每个测试中只包括一个注射了PT的对照组。这种分析的简化构成了所谓的“一致性方法”的一个例子。日本的一种HSA变种使用体温下降作为PT介导致敏的非致死替代指标,可以定量估计疫苗的残余PT活性。然而,定量方法的优势并不明显,因为对人体不安全的PT量是未知的。此外,尽管使用非致死终点是一个重要的改进,但与简化限度试验中使用的动物数量相比,在试验中需要一个参考组来获得定量估计,这增加了所需的动物数量。此外,非致死终点可能适用于极限试验格式,在这方面已经采取了重要步骤。最后,早期评估的一种选择是使用两种体外检测结果的可能性,一种是酶活性检测,另一种是结合检测,以取代HSA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Target alternative vaccine safety testing strategies for pertussis toxin

All acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines in use contain chemically inactivated pertussis toxin (PT). The finding that mice, naturally resistant to the effects of histamine, become sensitive upon injection of minute amounts of PT, led to the development of the test for residual PT known as the histamine sensitization assay (HSA). The HSA used by U.S.-licensed manufacturers is a limit test that shows that the residual bioactivity of PT in a single human dose of vaccine is below a threshold. Limit tests do not allow quantitative measurement. When the method is newly established at the point of use, three or more dilutions of pure PT are used to verify that mice injected with the vaccine came from a shipment that have sensitivity consistent with historical values. Sensitizability is expressed as an HSD50 (the dose that sensitizes 50% of a group of mice). However, once linearity of the dose response has been demonstrated, the assay may be simplified so as to include in each test only a single control group injected with PT. This assay simplification constitutes an example of the so-called “consistency approach.” A Japanese variant of the HSA uses a drop in body temperature as a nonlethal alternative index of PT-mediated sensitization and can provide a quantitative estimate of the residual PT activity of a vaccine. However, the advantage of a quantitative method is not obvious, because the amount of PT that is unsafe for humans is unknown. In addition, although the use of a nonlethal endpoint constitutes an important refinement, the need for a reference group in the test to obtain a quantitative estimate increases the number of animals required, relative to the number used in a simplified limit test. Moreover, the nonlethal endpoint might be adapted to the limit test format, and important steps have been taken in this regard. Finally, one option under early evaluation is the possibility of using the results from two in vitro assays, an enzymatic activity assay and a binding assay, to replace the HSA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信