企业社会责任复杂评价体系的实际应用

Indrė Slapikaitė
{"title":"企业社会责任复杂评价体系的实际应用","authors":"Indrė Slapikaitė","doi":"10.1016/j.intele.2017.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When the things go towards CSR, measuring and evaluating have became one of the key goals for researchers and practitioners. Especially when it is linked to the funders point of view – while funding the companies it became certainly important to practically assess the level of the company's CSR. Therefore, in this paper the multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods are suggested and used as the most appropriate tool for solving different kinds of economics and social problems. While using AHP method, a CSR complex evaluation system is formed practically with prioritizing the most important CSR criteria from the funders point of view. Then the rest of the MCDM methods (SAW, TOPSIS, VIKOR and SoR) are used for the comparison of some real companies' CSR level. Finally the compatibility level of the methods is checked, in order to minimize the influence of each MCDM method to the final results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37115,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intele.2017.03.002","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical application of CSR complex evaluation system\",\"authors\":\"Indrė Slapikaitė\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intele.2017.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>When the things go towards CSR, measuring and evaluating have became one of the key goals for researchers and practitioners. Especially when it is linked to the funders point of view – while funding the companies it became certainly important to practically assess the level of the company's CSR. Therefore, in this paper the multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods are suggested and used as the most appropriate tool for solving different kinds of economics and social problems. While using AHP method, a CSR complex evaluation system is formed practically with prioritizing the most important CSR criteria from the funders point of view. Then the rest of the MCDM methods (SAW, TOPSIS, VIKOR and SoR) are used for the comparison of some real companies' CSR level. Finally the compatibility level of the methods is checked, in order to minimize the influence of each MCDM method to the final results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intele.2017.03.002\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1822801116300285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1822801116300285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

当企业走向企业社会责任的时候,衡量和评估已经成为研究者和实践者的主要目标之一。特别是当它与出资人的观点联系在一起时——在资助公司的同时,实际评估公司的企业社会责任水平当然变得很重要。因此,本文提出了多准则决策(MCDM)方法,并将其作为解决各种经济和社会问题的最合适工具。运用层次分析法,从出资人的角度出发,对最重要的企业社会责任标准进行优先排序,实际形成了企业社会责任复杂评价体系。然后使用MCDM的其余方法(SAW、TOPSIS、VIKOR和SoR)对一些真实公司的企业社会责任水平进行比较。最后对各方法的兼容性水平进行检查,以尽量减少各MCDM方法对最终结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical application of CSR complex evaluation system

When the things go towards CSR, measuring and evaluating have became one of the key goals for researchers and practitioners. Especially when it is linked to the funders point of view – while funding the companies it became certainly important to practically assess the level of the company's CSR. Therefore, in this paper the multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods are suggested and used as the most appropriate tool for solving different kinds of economics and social problems. While using AHP method, a CSR complex evaluation system is formed practically with prioritizing the most important CSR criteria from the funders point of view. Then the rest of the MCDM methods (SAW, TOPSIS, VIKOR and SoR) are used for the comparison of some real companies' CSR level. Finally the compatibility level of the methods is checked, in order to minimize the influence of each MCDM method to the final results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intellectual Economics
Intellectual Economics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信