立陶宛第二支柱养老基金的基金参与者与基金管理公司股东关系

Mindaugas Strumskis, Artūras Balkevičius
{"title":"立陶宛第二支柱养老基金的基金参与者与基金管理公司股东关系","authors":"Mindaugas Strumskis,&nbsp;Artūras Balkevičius","doi":"10.1016/j.intele.2016.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Results achieved by the pension fund depend on how well they are managed or more specifically – on whether all decisions taken by the management are in favour of the fund participants. The goal of this paper is to examine how to harmonize interests of second pillar pension fund participants and fund managing company shareholders.</p><p>An interview with executives of all pension funds managing companies was performed twice – in 2011 and 2016. The answers allow to make conclusions about possible conflict of interest in pension fund management and measures taken by the companies and the state to minimize the risk. A survey of 507 pension fund participants was performed in order to obtain information on participants’ attitude and expectations. Despite the fact that most of participants are dissatisfied with the pension fund performance results, they would not agree to allocate additional resources to hire more competent managers.</p><p>To protect the interests of pension fund participants the stability of the pension accumulation system as a whole must be ensured. Also it is important to promote mutual confidence of all interested parties, to provide participants with easily understandable information, reflecting real performance results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37115,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual Economics","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intele.2016.06.004","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pension fund participants and fund managing company shareholder relations in Lithuania second pillar pension funds\",\"authors\":\"Mindaugas Strumskis,&nbsp;Artūras Balkevičius\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intele.2016.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Results achieved by the pension fund depend on how well they are managed or more specifically – on whether all decisions taken by the management are in favour of the fund participants. The goal of this paper is to examine how to harmonize interests of second pillar pension fund participants and fund managing company shareholders.</p><p>An interview with executives of all pension funds managing companies was performed twice – in 2011 and 2016. The answers allow to make conclusions about possible conflict of interest in pension fund management and measures taken by the companies and the state to minimize the risk. A survey of 507 pension fund participants was performed in order to obtain information on participants’ attitude and expectations. Despite the fact that most of participants are dissatisfied with the pension fund performance results, they would not agree to allocate additional resources to hire more competent managers.</p><p>To protect the interests of pension fund participants the stability of the pension accumulation system as a whole must be ensured. Also it is important to promote mutual confidence of all interested parties, to provide participants with easily understandable information, reflecting real performance results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual Economics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.intele.2016.06.004\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1822801116300157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1822801116300157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

养老基金取得的成果取决于它们管理得如何,或者更具体地说,取决于管理层做出的所有决定是否对基金参与者有利。本文的目的是研究如何协调第二支柱养老基金参与者和基金管理公司股东的利益。对所有养老基金管理公司的高管进行了两次采访,分别在2011年和2016年。通过这些问题的答案,可以得出养老基金管理中可能存在的利益冲突,以及公司和国家为最大限度地降低风险所采取的措施。为了获得参与者的态度和期望信息,对507名养老基金参与者进行了调查。尽管大多数参与者对养老基金的业绩结果不满意,但他们不会同意拨出额外的资源来雇用更有能力的经理。为了保障养老金参与人的利益,必须保证养老金积累制度的整体稳定性。此外,重要的是促进所有有关各方的相互信任,为参与者提供易于理解的信息,反映真实的业绩结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pension fund participants and fund managing company shareholder relations in Lithuania second pillar pension funds

Results achieved by the pension fund depend on how well they are managed or more specifically – on whether all decisions taken by the management are in favour of the fund participants. The goal of this paper is to examine how to harmonize interests of second pillar pension fund participants and fund managing company shareholders.

An interview with executives of all pension funds managing companies was performed twice – in 2011 and 2016. The answers allow to make conclusions about possible conflict of interest in pension fund management and measures taken by the companies and the state to minimize the risk. A survey of 507 pension fund participants was performed in order to obtain information on participants’ attitude and expectations. Despite the fact that most of participants are dissatisfied with the pension fund performance results, they would not agree to allocate additional resources to hire more competent managers.

To protect the interests of pension fund participants the stability of the pension accumulation system as a whole must be ensured. Also it is important to promote mutual confidence of all interested parties, to provide participants with easily understandable information, reflecting real performance results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intellectual Economics
Intellectual Economics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信