粒子混合形态对气溶胶散射和吸收的影响:一个离散偶极子模型研究

GeoResJ Pub Date : 2014-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.grj.2014.07.001
Qing Zhang, J.E. Thompson
{"title":"粒子混合形态对气溶胶散射和吸收的影响:一个离散偶极子模型研究","authors":"Qing Zhang,&nbsp;J.E. Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.grj.2014.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Atmospheric aerosol particles may undergo phase separation due to differences in miscibility. This alters the morphology of particles such that they are no longer well-mixed, simple spheres. As a result, scattering and absorption of sunlight in Earth’s atmosphere could be affected. In turn, this may alter direct climate forcing by aerosols. In this work we examine the impact of phase separation on aerosol optics for the bi-sphere, core–shell, and engulfed morphologies. We find bi-spherical particles often exhibit very different scattering and absorption cross-sections for a mid-visible wavelength (0.53<!--> <!-->μm) relative to an equivalent, volume-weighted spherical case. Optical differences are largely driven by the particle shape, rather than differences in refractive index between phases. However, when averaged across a typical urban particle size distribution, the differences in light scattering largely vanish and bi-sphere and volume equivalent models generally agreed to within 10% for dielectric particles. For particles that are light absorbing, the bi-sphere and volume averaged cases often yielded dissimilar results with the volume-averaged case reflecting absorption &gt;10% more than the phase separated particles. This was particularly true for bi-spheres in which one component particle is strongly light absorbing. Core–shell and engulfed morphologies yield volume scattering efficiencies within a few percent of volume-weighted spheres. However, modeled light absorption between the phase separated and volume averaged models frequently differ by &gt;20% when inclusions absorb light strongly. Therefore, modeling light absorption of mixed-phase particles through the volume-mixing rule cannot be recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93099,"journal":{"name":"GeoResJ","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 9-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.grj.2014.07.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of particle mixing morphology on aerosol scattering and absorption: A discrete dipole modeling study\",\"authors\":\"Qing Zhang,&nbsp;J.E. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.grj.2014.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Atmospheric aerosol particles may undergo phase separation due to differences in miscibility. This alters the morphology of particles such that they are no longer well-mixed, simple spheres. As a result, scattering and absorption of sunlight in Earth’s atmosphere could be affected. In turn, this may alter direct climate forcing by aerosols. In this work we examine the impact of phase separation on aerosol optics for the bi-sphere, core–shell, and engulfed morphologies. We find bi-spherical particles often exhibit very different scattering and absorption cross-sections for a mid-visible wavelength (0.53<!--> <!-->μm) relative to an equivalent, volume-weighted spherical case. Optical differences are largely driven by the particle shape, rather than differences in refractive index between phases. However, when averaged across a typical urban particle size distribution, the differences in light scattering largely vanish and bi-sphere and volume equivalent models generally agreed to within 10% for dielectric particles. For particles that are light absorbing, the bi-sphere and volume averaged cases often yielded dissimilar results with the volume-averaged case reflecting absorption &gt;10% more than the phase separated particles. This was particularly true for bi-spheres in which one component particle is strongly light absorbing. Core–shell and engulfed morphologies yield volume scattering efficiencies within a few percent of volume-weighted spheres. However, modeled light absorption between the phase separated and volume averaged models frequently differ by &gt;20% when inclusions absorb light strongly. Therefore, modeling light absorption of mixed-phase particles through the volume-mixing rule cannot be recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GeoResJ\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 9-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.grj.2014.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GeoResJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214242814000096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeoResJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214242814000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

由于混相性的不同,大气气溶胶颗粒可能发生相分离。这改变了粒子的形态,使它们不再是混合良好的简单球体。因此,地球大气中阳光的散射和吸收可能会受到影响。反过来,这可能会改变气溶胶对气候的直接影响。在这项工作中,我们研究了相分离对双球、核壳和吞没形态的气溶胶光学的影响。我们发现双球形粒子在中可见波长(0.53 μm)上的散射和吸收截面与同等体积加权球形粒子的散射和吸收截面非常不同。光学差异很大程度上是由粒子形状驱动的,而不是相位之间折射率的差异。然而,当在典型的城市颗粒尺寸分布上平均时,光散射的差异基本上消失了,双球和体积等效模型通常同意介电颗粒在10%以内。对于吸收光的粒子,双球和体积平均情况下往往产生不同的结果,体积平均情况下反射吸收比相分离粒子多10%。对于双球来说尤其如此,因为双球中的一个组分粒子具有很强的光吸收性。核-壳和吞没形态产生的体积散射效率在体积加权球体的几个百分点之内。然而,当内含物强烈吸收光时,相分离模型和体积平均模型之间的模型光吸收往往相差20%。因此,不建议通过体积混合规则来模拟混合相粒子的光吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of particle mixing morphology on aerosol scattering and absorption: A discrete dipole modeling study

Atmospheric aerosol particles may undergo phase separation due to differences in miscibility. This alters the morphology of particles such that they are no longer well-mixed, simple spheres. As a result, scattering and absorption of sunlight in Earth’s atmosphere could be affected. In turn, this may alter direct climate forcing by aerosols. In this work we examine the impact of phase separation on aerosol optics for the bi-sphere, core–shell, and engulfed morphologies. We find bi-spherical particles often exhibit very different scattering and absorption cross-sections for a mid-visible wavelength (0.53 μm) relative to an equivalent, volume-weighted spherical case. Optical differences are largely driven by the particle shape, rather than differences in refractive index between phases. However, when averaged across a typical urban particle size distribution, the differences in light scattering largely vanish and bi-sphere and volume equivalent models generally agreed to within 10% for dielectric particles. For particles that are light absorbing, the bi-sphere and volume averaged cases often yielded dissimilar results with the volume-averaged case reflecting absorption >10% more than the phase separated particles. This was particularly true for bi-spheres in which one component particle is strongly light absorbing. Core–shell and engulfed morphologies yield volume scattering efficiencies within a few percent of volume-weighted spheres. However, modeled light absorption between the phase separated and volume averaged models frequently differ by >20% when inclusions absorb light strongly. Therefore, modeling light absorption of mixed-phase particles through the volume-mixing rule cannot be recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信