T117

Q3 Medicine
A. Alexandrova, A. Chikina
{"title":"T117","authors":"A. Alexandrova,&nbsp;A. Chikina","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcsup.2015.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>During cancer development, tumor cells gain the ability to invade and metastasize. Individual cells use alternative migration modes based on different cellular mechanisms. One of them is mesenchymal motility mode which is driven by leading edge protrusion in the form of filopodia or/and lamellipodia based on Arp2/3 dependent actin polymerization. Mesenchymal motility depends on formation of cell-substrate adhesions, activity of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and on activity of small GTPaseRac. Another mode is amoeboid motility, which involves formation of blebs – hollow membrane protrusions extruded from the cell surface by actin-myosin contraction. Amoeboid motility does not need both pronounced cell-substrate adhesions and MMPs activity and required increase of activity of small GTPase Rho. Fibroblasts and scattered epithelial cells migrate by mesenchymal mode, while blood cells – lymphocytes or macrophages mainly use amoeboid mode for migration. It was shown that some treatments cause transition from one motility mode to another. Switches from mesenchymal to amoeboid motility and opposite are called mesenchymal-amoeboid transition (MAT) and amoeboid -mesenchymal transition (AMT) respectively. The ability of cells for such transitions was named as plasticity of migration. We compared the plasticity of migration of normal and tumor cells. To study plasticity of mesenchymally migrated cells (MAT) we choose fibrosarcoma cells HT1080 as tumor and non-transformed subcutaneous fibroblasts 1036 as normal counterpart. To study AMT we choose a few lines of myeloid leukemia THP1, K562, KG1 in contrast to normal leukocytes obtained from healthy donors. We showed that fibrosarcoma cells in opposite to non-transformed fibroblasts could undergo MAT under treatments, which limited mesenchymal migration. Two approaches to limit mesenchymal motility of cells were used. One was decrease of substrate adhesiveness by treatment of coverslips with PolyHema solutions, which simulated the alteration of environmental conditions during cell migration. The other approach was influence on cellular pathways regulated cell motility. We used CK666, the inhibitor of Arp2/3 activity, which stopped actin polymerization and thus lamellipodia formation through Arp2/3 dependent mechanism. We showed that under both treatments the fraction of tumor cells switched from lamellipodia formation to blebbing and thus underwent MAT, while in non-transformed fibroblasts these treatments led to retraction of lamellipodia and significant failure of motility. Both leukemia cells and leucocytes of healthy donors showed blebs formation (amoeboid motility). We induced transition to mesenchymal motility by alteration of culture conditions. The first approach was the increase of substrate adhesiveness by treatment with fibronectin. Another way was to inhibit of small GTPase Rho activity. In result of both treatments, leukemia cells switched from amoeboid to mesenchymal motility (underwent AMT), but leucocytes of healthy donor could not do such transition. For the first time it was shown that AMT is features of leukemia cells but not leucocytes from healthy donors. Both MAT and AMT are reversible, meaning that cells exhibiting plasticity could change motility mode in dependence on environment. Our results demonstrate that tumor cells of different origin could transit from one mode of motility to another and normal cells could not undergo such transitions. We also investigate the effectiveness of amoeboid and mesenchymal motility during migration in different environments. It was shown that the mesenchymal motility is more effective for 2D migration, while the amoeboid motility is more effective in 3D conditions. During dissemination, cells go beyond the borders of original tissues and pass through environment with different properties. The plasticity of migration triggered by alteration of entire or internal conditions dramatically increases ability of cells to disseminate. The ability of tumor cells to plasticity permits them to choose optimal mode for migration, thus leading to metastasis development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11675,"journal":{"name":"Ejc Supplements","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2015.08.003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"T117\",\"authors\":\"A. Alexandrova,&nbsp;A. Chikina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejcsup.2015.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>During cancer development, tumor cells gain the ability to invade and metastasize. Individual cells use alternative migration modes based on different cellular mechanisms. One of them is mesenchymal motility mode which is driven by leading edge protrusion in the form of filopodia or/and lamellipodia based on Arp2/3 dependent actin polymerization. Mesenchymal motility depends on formation of cell-substrate adhesions, activity of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and on activity of small GTPaseRac. Another mode is amoeboid motility, which involves formation of blebs – hollow membrane protrusions extruded from the cell surface by actin-myosin contraction. Amoeboid motility does not need both pronounced cell-substrate adhesions and MMPs activity and required increase of activity of small GTPase Rho. Fibroblasts and scattered epithelial cells migrate by mesenchymal mode, while blood cells – lymphocytes or macrophages mainly use amoeboid mode for migration. It was shown that some treatments cause transition from one motility mode to another. Switches from mesenchymal to amoeboid motility and opposite are called mesenchymal-amoeboid transition (MAT) and amoeboid -mesenchymal transition (AMT) respectively. The ability of cells for such transitions was named as plasticity of migration. We compared the plasticity of migration of normal and tumor cells. To study plasticity of mesenchymally migrated cells (MAT) we choose fibrosarcoma cells HT1080 as tumor and non-transformed subcutaneous fibroblasts 1036 as normal counterpart. To study AMT we choose a few lines of myeloid leukemia THP1, K562, KG1 in contrast to normal leukocytes obtained from healthy donors. We showed that fibrosarcoma cells in opposite to non-transformed fibroblasts could undergo MAT under treatments, which limited mesenchymal migration. Two approaches to limit mesenchymal motility of cells were used. One was decrease of substrate adhesiveness by treatment of coverslips with PolyHema solutions, which simulated the alteration of environmental conditions during cell migration. The other approach was influence on cellular pathways regulated cell motility. We used CK666, the inhibitor of Arp2/3 activity, which stopped actin polymerization and thus lamellipodia formation through Arp2/3 dependent mechanism. We showed that under both treatments the fraction of tumor cells switched from lamellipodia formation to blebbing and thus underwent MAT, while in non-transformed fibroblasts these treatments led to retraction of lamellipodia and significant failure of motility. Both leukemia cells and leucocytes of healthy donors showed blebs formation (amoeboid motility). We induced transition to mesenchymal motility by alteration of culture conditions. The first approach was the increase of substrate adhesiveness by treatment with fibronectin. Another way was to inhibit of small GTPase Rho activity. In result of both treatments, leukemia cells switched from amoeboid to mesenchymal motility (underwent AMT), but leucocytes of healthy donor could not do such transition. For the first time it was shown that AMT is features of leukemia cells but not leucocytes from healthy donors. Both MAT and AMT are reversible, meaning that cells exhibiting plasticity could change motility mode in dependence on environment. Our results demonstrate that tumor cells of different origin could transit from one mode of motility to another and normal cells could not undergo such transitions. We also investigate the effectiveness of amoeboid and mesenchymal motility during migration in different environments. It was shown that the mesenchymal motility is more effective for 2D migration, while the amoeboid motility is more effective in 3D conditions. During dissemination, cells go beyond the borders of original tissues and pass through environment with different properties. The plasticity of migration triggered by alteration of entire or internal conditions dramatically increases ability of cells to disseminate. The ability of tumor cells to plasticity permits them to choose optimal mode for migration, thus leading to metastasis development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejc Supplements\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2015.08.003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejc Supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135963491500004X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejc Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135963491500004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在癌症发展过程中,肿瘤细胞获得了侵袭和转移的能力。单个细胞使用基于不同细胞机制的可选迁移模式。其中一种是基于Arp2/3依赖性肌动蛋白聚合,由丝状足或/和板足形式的前缘突出驱动的间充质运动模式。间充质运动取决于细胞-底物粘附的形成、基质金属蛋白酶(MMPs)的活性和小GTPaseRac的活性。另一种模式是变形虫运动,它包括气泡的形成——通过肌动蛋白收缩从细胞表面挤出的中空膜突起。变形虫的运动不需要明显的细胞底物粘附和MMPs活性,并且需要小GTPase Rho活性的增加。成纤维细胞和分散的上皮细胞以间充质方式迁移,而血细胞-淋巴细胞或巨噬细胞主要以变形虫方式迁移。研究表明,一些处理导致从一种运动模式到另一种运动模式的转变。从间质到变形虫的运动和相反的运动分别被称为间质-变形虫转变(MAT)和变形虫-间质转变(AMT)。细胞进行这种转变的能力被称为迁移的可塑性。我们比较了正常细胞和肿瘤细胞的迁移可塑性。为了研究间充质迁移细胞(MAT)的可塑性,我们选择纤维肉瘤细胞HT1080作为肿瘤细胞,未转化的皮下成纤维细胞1036作为正常对照细胞。为了研究AMT,我们选择了一些髓系白血病细胞系THP1, K562, KG1,与从健康供体获得的正常白细胞进行对比。我们发现与未转化成纤维细胞相反的纤维肉瘤细胞可以在治疗下进行MAT,这限制了间充质迁移。使用了两种方法来限制细胞间充质运动。一种是用PolyHema溶液处理盖片,降低底物粘附性,模拟细胞迁移过程中环境条件的改变。另一种方法是影响细胞通路调节细胞运动。我们使用了Arp2/3活性抑制剂CK666,通过Arp2/3依赖机制阻止肌动蛋白聚合,从而阻止板足形成。我们发现,在两种治疗下,肿瘤细胞的部分从板足形成转变为起泡,从而进行了MAT,而在未转化的成纤维细胞中,这些治疗导致板足缩回和明显的运动障碍。白血病细胞和健康供者的白细胞均显示出气泡形成(变形虫运动)。我们通过改变培养条件诱导细胞向间充质运动性转变。第一种方法是通过纤维连接蛋白处理来增加底物的粘附性。另一种方法是抑制小GTPase Rho活性。两种治疗的结果是,白血病细胞从变形虫运动转变为间充质运动(进行AMT),但健康供者的白细胞不能进行这种转变。这是第一次证明AMT是白血病细胞的特征,而不是来自健康供体的白细胞。MAT和AMT都是可逆的,这意味着具有可塑性的细胞可以根据环境改变运动模式。我们的研究结果表明,不同来源的肿瘤细胞可以从一种运动模式转变为另一种运动模式,而正常细胞不能经历这种转变。我们还研究了变形虫和间充质运动在不同环境下迁移过程中的有效性。结果表明,间充质运动对二维迁移更有效,而变形虫运动在三维条件下更有效。在传播过程中,细胞会越过原组织的边界,穿过具有不同性质的环境。由整体或内部条件的改变所引发的迁移的可塑性极大地提高了细胞的传播能力。肿瘤细胞的可塑性使它们能够选择最佳的迁移模式,从而导致转移的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
T117

During cancer development, tumor cells gain the ability to invade and metastasize. Individual cells use alternative migration modes based on different cellular mechanisms. One of them is mesenchymal motility mode which is driven by leading edge protrusion in the form of filopodia or/and lamellipodia based on Arp2/3 dependent actin polymerization. Mesenchymal motility depends on formation of cell-substrate adhesions, activity of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and on activity of small GTPaseRac. Another mode is amoeboid motility, which involves formation of blebs – hollow membrane protrusions extruded from the cell surface by actin-myosin contraction. Amoeboid motility does not need both pronounced cell-substrate adhesions and MMPs activity and required increase of activity of small GTPase Rho. Fibroblasts and scattered epithelial cells migrate by mesenchymal mode, while blood cells – lymphocytes or macrophages mainly use amoeboid mode for migration. It was shown that some treatments cause transition from one motility mode to another. Switches from mesenchymal to amoeboid motility and opposite are called mesenchymal-amoeboid transition (MAT) and amoeboid -mesenchymal transition (AMT) respectively. The ability of cells for such transitions was named as plasticity of migration. We compared the plasticity of migration of normal and tumor cells. To study plasticity of mesenchymally migrated cells (MAT) we choose fibrosarcoma cells HT1080 as tumor and non-transformed subcutaneous fibroblasts 1036 as normal counterpart. To study AMT we choose a few lines of myeloid leukemia THP1, K562, KG1 in contrast to normal leukocytes obtained from healthy donors. We showed that fibrosarcoma cells in opposite to non-transformed fibroblasts could undergo MAT under treatments, which limited mesenchymal migration. Two approaches to limit mesenchymal motility of cells were used. One was decrease of substrate adhesiveness by treatment of coverslips with PolyHema solutions, which simulated the alteration of environmental conditions during cell migration. The other approach was influence on cellular pathways regulated cell motility. We used CK666, the inhibitor of Arp2/3 activity, which stopped actin polymerization and thus lamellipodia formation through Arp2/3 dependent mechanism. We showed that under both treatments the fraction of tumor cells switched from lamellipodia formation to blebbing and thus underwent MAT, while in non-transformed fibroblasts these treatments led to retraction of lamellipodia and significant failure of motility. Both leukemia cells and leucocytes of healthy donors showed blebs formation (amoeboid motility). We induced transition to mesenchymal motility by alteration of culture conditions. The first approach was the increase of substrate adhesiveness by treatment with fibronectin. Another way was to inhibit of small GTPase Rho activity. In result of both treatments, leukemia cells switched from amoeboid to mesenchymal motility (underwent AMT), but leucocytes of healthy donor could not do such transition. For the first time it was shown that AMT is features of leukemia cells but not leucocytes from healthy donors. Both MAT and AMT are reversible, meaning that cells exhibiting plasticity could change motility mode in dependence on environment. Our results demonstrate that tumor cells of different origin could transit from one mode of motility to another and normal cells could not undergo such transitions. We also investigate the effectiveness of amoeboid and mesenchymal motility during migration in different environments. It was shown that the mesenchymal motility is more effective for 2D migration, while the amoeboid motility is more effective in 3D conditions. During dissemination, cells go beyond the borders of original tissues and pass through environment with different properties. The plasticity of migration triggered by alteration of entire or internal conditions dramatically increases ability of cells to disseminate. The ability of tumor cells to plasticity permits them to choose optimal mode for migration, thus leading to metastasis development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ejc Supplements
Ejc Supplements 医学-肿瘤学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: EJC Supplements is an open access companion journal to the European Journal of Cancer. As an open access journal, all published articles are subject to an Article Publication Fee. Immediately upon publication, all articles in EJC Supplements are made openly available through the journal''s websites. EJC Supplements will consider for publication the proceedings of scientific symposia, commissioned thematic issues, and collections of invited articles on preclinical and basic cancer research, translational oncology, clinical oncology and cancer epidemiology and prevention. Authors considering the publication of a supplement in EJC Supplements are requested to contact the Editorial Office of the EJC to discuss their proposal with the Editor-in-Chief. EJC Supplements is an official journal of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), the European CanCer Organisation (ECCO) and the European Society of Mastology (EUSOMA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信