观察资料中关注的健康结果:确定文献中定义的问题

Paul E. Stang PhD , Patrick B. Ryan PhD , Stacie B. Dusetzina PhD , Abraham G. Hartzema PharmD, MSPH, PhD , Christian Reich MD, PhD , J. Marc Overhage MD, PhD , Judith A. Racoosin MD, MPH
{"title":"观察资料中关注的健康结果:确定文献中定义的问题","authors":"Paul E. Stang PhD ,&nbsp;Patrick B. Ryan PhD ,&nbsp;Stacie B. Dusetzina PhD ,&nbsp;Abraham G. Hartzema PharmD, MSPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Christian Reich MD, PhD ,&nbsp;J. Marc Overhage MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Judith A. Racoosin MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe the literature search strategies and results to inform development of health outcomes of interest (HOI) definitions studied within the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) research program. These HOIs represent the safety and benefit endpoints that may be associated with the use of particular medications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two organizations implemented search strategies to identify articles that described the validation of various HOI definition algorithms and produced systematic reviews of the published literature for the OMOP HOIs; reviews of 5 HOIs were available from each organization. Search results were summarized descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Based on the differences in publications identified by each organization, neither search strategy captured all the relevant literature across 5 HOIs. A composite search strategy developed by the OMOP research team failed to effectively capture all relevant publications as well. Among publications in observational databases, a large proportion did not report actual codes used to identify HOIs in administrative claims databases, nor did they provide substantive detail of any validation studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No single search strategy or literature database captured all relevant articles efficiently. The lack of specific search terms hampered identification of relevant articles. Due to limited details about positive predictive value of various HOI definitions, information culled from available literature was insufficient to identify one best definition for each HOI. Researchers seeking to capture and understand prior published work that defined relevant outcomes of interest need to be aware of the shortcomings of this approach and the lack of detail of validation studies available in published literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88882,"journal":{"name":"Health outcomes research in medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages e37-e44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.11.003","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Outcomes of Interest in Observational Data: Issues in Identifying Definitions in the Literature\",\"authors\":\"Paul E. Stang PhD ,&nbsp;Patrick B. Ryan PhD ,&nbsp;Stacie B. Dusetzina PhD ,&nbsp;Abraham G. Hartzema PharmD, MSPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Christian Reich MD, PhD ,&nbsp;J. Marc Overhage MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Judith A. Racoosin MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe the literature search strategies and results to inform development of health outcomes of interest (HOI) definitions studied within the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) research program. These HOIs represent the safety and benefit endpoints that may be associated with the use of particular medications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two organizations implemented search strategies to identify articles that described the validation of various HOI definition algorithms and produced systematic reviews of the published literature for the OMOP HOIs; reviews of 5 HOIs were available from each organization. Search results were summarized descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Based on the differences in publications identified by each organization, neither search strategy captured all the relevant literature across 5 HOIs. A composite search strategy developed by the OMOP research team failed to effectively capture all relevant publications as well. Among publications in observational databases, a large proportion did not report actual codes used to identify HOIs in administrative claims databases, nor did they provide substantive detail of any validation studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No single search strategy or literature database captured all relevant articles efficiently. The lack of specific search terms hampered identification of relevant articles. Due to limited details about positive predictive value of various HOI definitions, information culled from available literature was insufficient to identify one best definition for each HOI. Researchers seeking to capture and understand prior published work that defined relevant outcomes of interest need to be aware of the shortcomings of this approach and the lack of detail of validation studies available in published literature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health outcomes research in medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages e37-e44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.11.003\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health outcomes research in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131911000486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health outcomes research in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131911000486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

目的描述文献检索策略和结果,为在观察性医学结果伙伴关系(OMOP)研究计划中研究的感兴趣的健康结果(HOI)定义的发展提供信息。这些hoi代表了可能与使用特定药物相关的安全性和获益终点。两个组织实施了搜索策略,以识别描述各种HOI定义算法验证的文章,并对OMOP HOI的已发表文献进行系统综述;每个组织提供了5个hoi的审查。对搜索结果进行描述性总结。结果基于每个组织确定的出版物的差异,两种搜索策略都没有捕获5个hoi的所有相关文献。OMOP研究小组开发的复合搜索策略也未能有效地捕获所有相关出版物。在观察性数据库的出版物中,很大一部分没有报告用于识别行政索赔数据库中hoi的实际代码,也没有提供任何验证研究的实质性细节。结论没有单一的检索策略或文献数据库能有效地获取所有相关文献。缺乏具体的搜索词阻碍了相关文章的识别。由于各种HOI定义的积极预测价值的细节有限,从现有文献中挑选的信息不足以为每种HOI确定一个最佳定义。研究人员试图捕捉和理解先前发表的定义相关结果的研究成果,需要意识到这种方法的缺点,以及在已发表的文献中缺乏验证研究的细节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Outcomes of Interest in Observational Data: Issues in Identifying Definitions in the Literature

Objectives

To describe the literature search strategies and results to inform development of health outcomes of interest (HOI) definitions studied within the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) research program. These HOIs represent the safety and benefit endpoints that may be associated with the use of particular medications.

Methods

Two organizations implemented search strategies to identify articles that described the validation of various HOI definition algorithms and produced systematic reviews of the published literature for the OMOP HOIs; reviews of 5 HOIs were available from each organization. Search results were summarized descriptively.

Results

Based on the differences in publications identified by each organization, neither search strategy captured all the relevant literature across 5 HOIs. A composite search strategy developed by the OMOP research team failed to effectively capture all relevant publications as well. Among publications in observational databases, a large proportion did not report actual codes used to identify HOIs in administrative claims databases, nor did they provide substantive detail of any validation studies.

Conclusion

No single search strategy or literature database captured all relevant articles efficiently. The lack of specific search terms hampered identification of relevant articles. Due to limited details about positive predictive value of various HOI definitions, information culled from available literature was insufficient to identify one best definition for each HOI. Researchers seeking to capture and understand prior published work that defined relevant outcomes of interest need to be aware of the shortcomings of this approach and the lack of detail of validation studies available in published literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信