Paul E. Stang PhD , Patrick B. Ryan PhD , Stacie B. Dusetzina PhD , Abraham G. Hartzema PharmD, MSPH, PhD , Christian Reich MD, PhD , J. Marc Overhage MD, PhD , Judith A. Racoosin MD, MPH
{"title":"观察资料中关注的健康结果:确定文献中定义的问题","authors":"Paul E. Stang PhD , Patrick B. Ryan PhD , Stacie B. Dusetzina PhD , Abraham G. Hartzema PharmD, MSPH, PhD , Christian Reich MD, PhD , J. Marc Overhage MD, PhD , Judith A. Racoosin MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe the literature search strategies and results to inform development of health outcomes of interest (HOI) definitions studied within the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) research program. These HOIs represent the safety and benefit endpoints that may be associated with the use of particular medications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two organizations implemented search strategies to identify articles that described the validation of various HOI definition algorithms and produced systematic reviews of the published literature for the OMOP HOIs; reviews of 5 HOIs were available from each organization. Search results were summarized descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Based on the differences in publications identified by each organization, neither search strategy captured all the relevant literature across 5 HOIs. A composite search strategy developed by the OMOP research team failed to effectively capture all relevant publications as well. Among publications in observational databases, a large proportion did not report actual codes used to identify HOIs in administrative claims databases, nor did they provide substantive detail of any validation studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No single search strategy or literature database captured all relevant articles efficiently. The lack of specific search terms hampered identification of relevant articles. Due to limited details about positive predictive value of various HOI definitions, information culled from available literature was insufficient to identify one best definition for each HOI. Researchers seeking to capture and understand prior published work that defined relevant outcomes of interest need to be aware of the shortcomings of this approach and the lack of detail of validation studies available in published literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88882,"journal":{"name":"Health outcomes research in medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages e37-e44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.11.003","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Outcomes of Interest in Observational Data: Issues in Identifying Definitions in the Literature\",\"authors\":\"Paul E. Stang PhD , Patrick B. Ryan PhD , Stacie B. Dusetzina PhD , Abraham G. Hartzema PharmD, MSPH, PhD , Christian Reich MD, PhD , J. Marc Overhage MD, PhD , Judith A. Racoosin MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe the literature search strategies and results to inform development of health outcomes of interest (HOI) definitions studied within the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) research program. These HOIs represent the safety and benefit endpoints that may be associated with the use of particular medications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two organizations implemented search strategies to identify articles that described the validation of various HOI definition algorithms and produced systematic reviews of the published literature for the OMOP HOIs; reviews of 5 HOIs were available from each organization. Search results were summarized descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Based on the differences in publications identified by each organization, neither search strategy captured all the relevant literature across 5 HOIs. A composite search strategy developed by the OMOP research team failed to effectively capture all relevant publications as well. Among publications in observational databases, a large proportion did not report actual codes used to identify HOIs in administrative claims databases, nor did they provide substantive detail of any validation studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No single search strategy or literature database captured all relevant articles efficiently. The lack of specific search terms hampered identification of relevant articles. Due to limited details about positive predictive value of various HOI definitions, information culled from available literature was insufficient to identify one best definition for each HOI. Researchers seeking to capture and understand prior published work that defined relevant outcomes of interest need to be aware of the shortcomings of this approach and the lack of detail of validation studies available in published literature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health outcomes research in medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages e37-e44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.11.003\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health outcomes research in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131911000486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health outcomes research in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131911000486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Health Outcomes of Interest in Observational Data: Issues in Identifying Definitions in the Literature
Objectives
To describe the literature search strategies and results to inform development of health outcomes of interest (HOI) definitions studied within the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) research program. These HOIs represent the safety and benefit endpoints that may be associated with the use of particular medications.
Methods
Two organizations implemented search strategies to identify articles that described the validation of various HOI definition algorithms and produced systematic reviews of the published literature for the OMOP HOIs; reviews of 5 HOIs were available from each organization. Search results were summarized descriptively.
Results
Based on the differences in publications identified by each organization, neither search strategy captured all the relevant literature across 5 HOIs. A composite search strategy developed by the OMOP research team failed to effectively capture all relevant publications as well. Among publications in observational databases, a large proportion did not report actual codes used to identify HOIs in administrative claims databases, nor did they provide substantive detail of any validation studies.
Conclusion
No single search strategy or literature database captured all relevant articles efficiently. The lack of specific search terms hampered identification of relevant articles. Due to limited details about positive predictive value of various HOI definitions, information culled from available literature was insufficient to identify one best definition for each HOI. Researchers seeking to capture and understand prior published work that defined relevant outcomes of interest need to be aware of the shortcomings of this approach and the lack of detail of validation studies available in published literature.