谁来照顾我们?探讨被调查者对初级保健和专科保健医生满意度的差异

Michael Adolph MD , Jun Wu PhD , Steven R. Feldman MD, PhD , Rajesh Balkrishnan PhD
{"title":"谁来照顾我们?探讨被调查者对初级保健和专科保健医生满意度的差异","authors":"Michael Adolph MD ,&nbsp;Jun Wu PhD ,&nbsp;Steven R. Feldman MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rajesh Balkrishnan PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our study explored perceived patient satisfaction with either primary care or specialist physicians to identify factors accounting for the differences.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>The data were collected from an Internet-based survey, <span>DrScore.com</span><svg><path></path></svg><span>, for measuring patient satisfaction with physicians. Participants found their doctors through the DrScore search engine and rated their physicians with anonymity. A total satisfaction score was the sum of scores based on 9 physician rating items and then was scaled to the range of 0-100. Logistic regressions were used to analyze associations between patient satisfaction (score ≥70) and various factors.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean satisfaction score was 79.4 for primary care (n = 11,558) and 75.5 for specialty care (n = 11,068) (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). Nearly 50% of primary care patients waited for 0-2 days to get an appointment, while more than 50% of specialty care patients waited for more than 6 days. As waiting days became longer than 2 weeks, patient ratings of specialty care were lower than those of primary care. Patients (≥45 years) were 24% less likely to be satisfied with primary care (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) but 40% more likely with specialty care (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) than patients (&lt;25 years).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although differences in overall patient satisfaction with primary and specialty care were not observed, more specialists obtained extremely low satisfaction scores than primary care providers did. Age and factors related to waiting time for the visit or time spent with a doctor were associated with patient satisfaction with physicians.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88882,"journal":{"name":"Health outcomes research in medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages e3-e10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.10.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Will Take Care of Us? Exploring Differences in Respondents’ Satisfaction with Primary Care vs Specialty Care Physicians\",\"authors\":\"Michael Adolph MD ,&nbsp;Jun Wu PhD ,&nbsp;Steven R. Feldman MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rajesh Balkrishnan PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Our study explored perceived patient satisfaction with either primary care or specialist physicians to identify factors accounting for the differences.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>The data were collected from an Internet-based survey, <span>DrScore.com</span><svg><path></path></svg><span>, for measuring patient satisfaction with physicians. Participants found their doctors through the DrScore search engine and rated their physicians with anonymity. A total satisfaction score was the sum of scores based on 9 physician rating items and then was scaled to the range of 0-100. Logistic regressions were used to analyze associations between patient satisfaction (score ≥70) and various factors.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean satisfaction score was 79.4 for primary care (n = 11,558) and 75.5 for specialty care (n = 11,068) (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). Nearly 50% of primary care patients waited for 0-2 days to get an appointment, while more than 50% of specialty care patients waited for more than 6 days. As waiting days became longer than 2 weeks, patient ratings of specialty care were lower than those of primary care. Patients (≥45 years) were 24% less likely to be satisfied with primary care (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) but 40% more likely with specialty care (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) than patients (&lt;25 years).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although differences in overall patient satisfaction with primary and specialty care were not observed, more specialists obtained extremely low satisfaction scores than primary care providers did. Age and factors related to waiting time for the visit or time spent with a doctor were associated with patient satisfaction with physicians.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health outcomes research in medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages e3-e10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2011.10.002\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health outcomes research in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131911000413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health outcomes research in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131911000413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的本研究探讨患者对初级保健医生和专科医生的满意度,以确定造成差异的因素。研究设计数据收集自一个基于互联网的调查,DrScore.com,用于测量患者对医生的满意度。参与者通过DrScore搜索引擎找到他们的医生,并匿名给他们的医生打分。总满意度是基于9个医生评价项目的得分之和,然后按0-100的范围进行缩放。采用Logistic回归分析患者满意度(≥70分)与各因素之间的关系。结果初级护理满意度平均为79.4分(n = 11558),专科护理满意度平均为75.5分(n = 11068) (P >. 05)。近50%的初级保健患者等待0-2天才能获得预约,而超过50%的专科护理患者等待6天以上。当等待时间超过2周时,患者对专科护理的评分低于初级护理。患者(≥45岁)对初级保健的满意度降低24% (P <.01),但接受专科护理的可能性要高40% (P <.01)高于25岁患者(<25)。结论:虽然没有观察到患者对初级和专科护理的总体满意度差异,但更多的专科医生的满意度得分比初级保健提供者低。年龄和与就诊等待时间或与医生相处时间相关的因素与患者对医生的满意度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who Will Take Care of Us? Exploring Differences in Respondents’ Satisfaction with Primary Care vs Specialty Care Physicians

Objective

Our study explored perceived patient satisfaction with either primary care or specialist physicians to identify factors accounting for the differences.

Study Design

The data were collected from an Internet-based survey, DrScore.com, for measuring patient satisfaction with physicians. Participants found their doctors through the DrScore search engine and rated their physicians with anonymity. A total satisfaction score was the sum of scores based on 9 physician rating items and then was scaled to the range of 0-100. Logistic regressions were used to analyze associations between patient satisfaction (score ≥70) and various factors.

Results

The mean satisfaction score was 79.4 for primary care (n = 11,558) and 75.5 for specialty care (n = 11,068) (P > .05). Nearly 50% of primary care patients waited for 0-2 days to get an appointment, while more than 50% of specialty care patients waited for more than 6 days. As waiting days became longer than 2 weeks, patient ratings of specialty care were lower than those of primary care. Patients (≥45 years) were 24% less likely to be satisfied with primary care (P < .01) but 40% more likely with specialty care (P < .01) than patients (<25 years).

Conclusions

Although differences in overall patient satisfaction with primary and specialty care were not observed, more specialists obtained extremely low satisfaction scores than primary care providers did. Age and factors related to waiting time for the visit or time spent with a doctor were associated with patient satisfaction with physicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信