{"title":"基于生命周期成本法的小型污水处理厂不同设计和运行方案的经济评价","authors":"David Pryce , Zoran Kapelan , Fayyaz A. Memon","doi":"10.1016/j.deveng.2022.100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-performance wastewater treatment technologies suited to the urban environment remain largely inaccessible to developing countries due to financial constraints. Instead, inadequate technologies are being used that adversely affect the quality of water resources and limit their sustainability. One high performing technology that offers possible solution is a packaged version of the integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) system consisting of a 20 m<sup>3</sup> aerobic reactor and a 4.2 m<sup>3</sup> settlement tank. The present work has investigated aspects of this typically-expensive solution that can be economized to improve its uptake in these countries. To achieve this a life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was performed and potential savings identified. The results obtained show that the life cycle cost is $0.31/m<sup>3</sup> and that costs primarily occurred at the construction stage (11.9%) and the operation and maintenance stage (88.1%) with negligible disposal costs. A reduction of up to 42.4% in construction costs were shown to be accessible by adopting other materials such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or to a lesser extent glass-fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP). The greatest single cost in the life cycle was found to be incurred by aeration (48.9%), requiring expenditure of $0.15/m<sup>3</sup>, however the use of intermittent aeration (IA) could reduce this further to $0.08/m<sup>3</sup>. Further work is suggested to investigate the broader sustainability of the different aeration strategies in light of these economic results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37901,"journal":{"name":"Development Engineering","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352728522000124/pdfft?md5=d447e1ab31f56fc5aaaa10201c36dcda&pid=1-s2.0-S2352728522000124-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic evaluation of a small wastewater treatment plant under different design and operation scenarios by life cycle costing\",\"authors\":\"David Pryce , Zoran Kapelan , Fayyaz A. Memon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.deveng.2022.100103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>High-performance wastewater treatment technologies suited to the urban environment remain largely inaccessible to developing countries due to financial constraints. Instead, inadequate technologies are being used that adversely affect the quality of water resources and limit their sustainability. One high performing technology that offers possible solution is a packaged version of the integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) system consisting of a 20 m<sup>3</sup> aerobic reactor and a 4.2 m<sup>3</sup> settlement tank. The present work has investigated aspects of this typically-expensive solution that can be economized to improve its uptake in these countries. To achieve this a life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was performed and potential savings identified. The results obtained show that the life cycle cost is $0.31/m<sup>3</sup> and that costs primarily occurred at the construction stage (11.9%) and the operation and maintenance stage (88.1%) with negligible disposal costs. A reduction of up to 42.4% in construction costs were shown to be accessible by adopting other materials such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or to a lesser extent glass-fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP). The greatest single cost in the life cycle was found to be incurred by aeration (48.9%), requiring expenditure of $0.15/m<sup>3</sup>, however the use of intermittent aeration (IA) could reduce this further to $0.08/m<sup>3</sup>. Further work is suggested to investigate the broader sustainability of the different aeration strategies in light of these economic results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development Engineering\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352728522000124/pdfft?md5=d447e1ab31f56fc5aaaa10201c36dcda&pid=1-s2.0-S2352728522000124-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352728522000124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352728522000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic evaluation of a small wastewater treatment plant under different design and operation scenarios by life cycle costing
High-performance wastewater treatment technologies suited to the urban environment remain largely inaccessible to developing countries due to financial constraints. Instead, inadequate technologies are being used that adversely affect the quality of water resources and limit their sustainability. One high performing technology that offers possible solution is a packaged version of the integrated fixed-film activated sludge (IFAS) system consisting of a 20 m3 aerobic reactor and a 4.2 m3 settlement tank. The present work has investigated aspects of this typically-expensive solution that can be economized to improve its uptake in these countries. To achieve this a life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was performed and potential savings identified. The results obtained show that the life cycle cost is $0.31/m3 and that costs primarily occurred at the construction stage (11.9%) and the operation and maintenance stage (88.1%) with negligible disposal costs. A reduction of up to 42.4% in construction costs were shown to be accessible by adopting other materials such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE) or to a lesser extent glass-fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP). The greatest single cost in the life cycle was found to be incurred by aeration (48.9%), requiring expenditure of $0.15/m3, however the use of intermittent aeration (IA) could reduce this further to $0.08/m3. Further work is suggested to investigate the broader sustainability of the different aeration strategies in light of these economic results.
Development EngineeringEconomics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊介绍:
Development Engineering: The Journal of Engineering in Economic Development (Dev Eng) is an open access, interdisciplinary journal applying engineering and economic research to the problems of poverty. Published studies must present novel research motivated by a specific global development problem. The journal serves as a bridge between engineers, economists, and other scientists involved in research on human, social, and economic development. Specific topics include: • Engineering research in response to unique constraints imposed by poverty. • Assessment of pro-poor technology solutions, including field performance, consumer adoption, and end-user impacts. • Novel technologies or tools for measuring behavioral, economic, and social outcomes in low-resource settings. • Hypothesis-generating research that explores technology markets and the role of innovation in economic development. • Lessons from the field, especially null results from field trials and technical failure analyses. • Rigorous analysis of existing development "solutions" through an engineering or economic lens. Although the journal focuses on quantitative, scientific approaches, it is intended to be suitable for a wider audience of development practitioners and policy makers, with evidence that can be used to improve decision-making. It also will be useful for engineering and applied economics faculty who conduct research or teach in "technology for development."