腹股沟疝矫正术后疼痛的回肠下胃/髂腹股沟神经阻滞:解剖标记技术与超声引导技术的比较

Abdurrahman Demirci, Esra Mercanoglu Efe, Gürkan Türker, Alp Gurbet, Fatma Nur Kaya, Ali Anil, İlker Çimen
{"title":"腹股沟疝矫正术后疼痛的回肠下胃/髂腹股沟神经阻滞:解剖标记技术与超声引导技术的比较","authors":"Abdurrahman Demirci,&nbsp;Esra Mercanoglu Efe,&nbsp;Gürkan Türker,&nbsp;Alp Gurbet,&nbsp;Fatma Nur Kaya,&nbsp;Ali Anil,&nbsp;İlker Çimen","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve blocks performed with the ultrasound guided and the anatomical landmark techniques for postoperative pain management in cases of adult inguinal herniorrhaphy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>40 patients, ASA I–II status were randomized into two groups equally: in Group AN (anatomical landmark technique) and in Group ultrasound (ultrasound guided technique), iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block was performed with 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine prior to surgery with the specified techniques. Pain score in postoperative assessment, first mobilization time, duration of hospital stay, score of postoperative analgesia satisfaction, opioid induced side effects and complications related to block were assessed for 24 h postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>VAS scores at rest in the recovery room and all the clinical follow-up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01 or <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). VAS scores at movement in the recovery room and all the clinical follow-up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 in all time points). While duration of hospital stay and the first mobilization time were being found significantly shorter, analgesia satisfaction scores were found significantly higher in ultrasound Group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to our study, US guided iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block in adult inguinal herniorrhaphies provides a more effective analgesia and higher satisfaction of analgesia than iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block with the anatomical landmark technique. Moreover, it may be suggested that the observation of anatomical structures with the US may increase the success of the block, and minimize the block-related complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"64 5","pages":"Pages 350-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.01.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bloqueo de los nervios ileohipogástrico/ilioinguinal en corrección de hernia inguinal para el tratamiento del dolor en el postoperatorio: comparación entre la técnica de marcas anatómicas y la guiada por ultrasonido\",\"authors\":\"Abdurrahman Demirci,&nbsp;Esra Mercanoglu Efe,&nbsp;Gürkan Türker,&nbsp;Alp Gurbet,&nbsp;Fatma Nur Kaya,&nbsp;Ali Anil,&nbsp;İlker Çimen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve blocks performed with the ultrasound guided and the anatomical landmark techniques for postoperative pain management in cases of adult inguinal herniorrhaphy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>40 patients, ASA I–II status were randomized into two groups equally: in Group AN (anatomical landmark technique) and in Group ultrasound (ultrasound guided technique), iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block was performed with 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine prior to surgery with the specified techniques. Pain score in postoperative assessment, first mobilization time, duration of hospital stay, score of postoperative analgesia satisfaction, opioid induced side effects and complications related to block were assessed for 24 h postoperatively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>VAS scores at rest in the recovery room and all the clinical follow-up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01 or <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). VAS scores at movement in the recovery room and all the clinical follow-up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 in all time points). While duration of hospital stay and the first mobilization time were being found significantly shorter, analgesia satisfaction scores were found significantly higher in ultrasound Group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to our study, US guided iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block in adult inguinal herniorrhaphies provides a more effective analgesia and higher satisfaction of analgesia than iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block with the anatomical landmark technique. Moreover, it may be suggested that the observation of anatomical structures with the US may increase the success of the block, and minimize the block-related complications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"volume\":\"64 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 350-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.01.001\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496314000105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496314000105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的比较超声引导下髂腹下/髂腹股沟神经阻滞与解剖标记技术在成人腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛治疗中的疗效。方法将40例ASA I-II级患者随机分为两组:AN组(解剖标志技术)和超声组(超声引导技术),术前应用0.5%左布比卡因20 ml进行髂下胃/髂腹股沟神经阻滞。术后24 h评估疼痛评分、首次活动时间、住院时间、术后镇痛满意度评分、阿片类药物不良反应及阻滞相关并发症。结果超声组患者康复室静息时vas评分及各临床随访点评分均明显低于对照组(p <0.01或p <0.001)。恢复室运动时及临床随访各点VAS评分均明显低于超声组(p <所有时间点均为0.001)。超声组患者住院时间和首次活动时间明显缩短,镇痛满意度评分明显高于超声组(p <0.05, p <0.001, p <0.001分别)。结论超声引导下髂腹下/髂腹股沟神经阻滞在成人腹股沟疝修补术中的镇痛效果优于解剖标记技术下的髂腹下/髂腹股沟神经阻滞。此外,我们可能认为使用US观察解剖结构可以增加阻滞的成功率,并减少与阻滞相关的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bloqueo de los nervios ileohipogástrico/ilioinguinal en corrección de hernia inguinal para el tratamiento del dolor en el postoperatorio: comparación entre la técnica de marcas anatómicas y la guiada por ultrasonido

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve blocks performed with the ultrasound guided and the anatomical landmark techniques for postoperative pain management in cases of adult inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Methods

40 patients, ASA I–II status were randomized into two groups equally: in Group AN (anatomical landmark technique) and in Group ultrasound (ultrasound guided technique), iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block was performed with 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine prior to surgery with the specified techniques. Pain score in postoperative assessment, first mobilization time, duration of hospital stay, score of postoperative analgesia satisfaction, opioid induced side effects and complications related to block were assessed for 24 h postoperatively.

Results

VAS scores at rest in the recovery room and all the clinical follow-up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (p < 0.01 or p < 0.001). VAS scores at movement in the recovery room and all the clinical follow-up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (p < 0.001 in all time points). While duration of hospital stay and the first mobilization time were being found significantly shorter, analgesia satisfaction scores were found significantly higher in ultrasound Group (p < 0.05, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively).

Conclusion

According to our study, US guided iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block in adult inguinal herniorrhaphies provides a more effective analgesia and higher satisfaction of analgesia than iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block with the anatomical landmark technique. Moreover, it may be suggested that the observation of anatomical structures with the US may increase the success of the block, and minimize the block-related complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信