droperidol和ondansetron对蛛网膜下腔吗啡引起的瘙痒的预防作用的比较

Fabio Ferreira da Cunha Brião , Marcio Leal Horta , Bernardo Lessa Horta , Guilherme Antônio Moreira de Barros , Ana Paula Behrensdorf , Ingrid Severo , Mariana Antunes Nunes , Roberta Boabaid , André Real
{"title":"droperidol和ondansetron对蛛网膜下腔吗啡引起的瘙痒的预防作用的比较","authors":"Fabio Ferreira da Cunha Brião ,&nbsp;Marcio Leal Horta ,&nbsp;Bernardo Lessa Horta ,&nbsp;Guilherme Antônio Moreira de Barros ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Behrensdorf ,&nbsp;Ingrid Severo ,&nbsp;Mariana Antunes Nunes ,&nbsp;Roberta Boabaid ,&nbsp;André Real","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>The prophylactic effect of ondansetron on subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus is controversial, while evidence suggests that droperidol prevents pruritus. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of droperidol and ondansetron on subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred eighty patients ASA <span>I</span> or <span>II</span> patients scheduled to undergo cesarean sections under subarachnoid anesthesia combined with morphine 0.2<!--> <!-->mg were randomized to receive, after the child's birth, metoclopramide 10<!--> <!-->mg (Group <span>I-</span>control), droperidol 2.5<!--> <!-->mg (Group <span>II</span>) or ondansetron 8<!--> <!-->mg (Group <span>III</span>). Postoperatively, the patients were assessed for pruritus (absent, mild, moderate or severe) or other side effects by blinded investigators. Patients were also blinded to their group allocation. The tendency to present more severe forms of pruritus was compared between groups. NNT was also determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients assigned to receive droperidol (proportional odds ratio: 0.45 [95% confidence interval 0.23-0.88]) reported less pruritus than those who received metoclopramide. Ondansetron effect was similar to metoclopramide (proportional odds ratio: 0.95 [95% confidence interval 0.49-1.83]). The NNT for droperidol and ondansetron was 4.0 and 14.7, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Ondansetron does not inhibit subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"65 4","pages":"Pages 244-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.11.006","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparación de los efectos profilácticos del droperidol y del ondansetrón sobre el prurito provocado por la morfina subaracnoidea\",\"authors\":\"Fabio Ferreira da Cunha Brião ,&nbsp;Marcio Leal Horta ,&nbsp;Bernardo Lessa Horta ,&nbsp;Guilherme Antônio Moreira de Barros ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Behrensdorf ,&nbsp;Ingrid Severo ,&nbsp;Mariana Antunes Nunes ,&nbsp;Roberta Boabaid ,&nbsp;André Real\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.11.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>The prophylactic effect of ondansetron on subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus is controversial, while evidence suggests that droperidol prevents pruritus. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of droperidol and ondansetron on subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred eighty patients ASA <span>I</span> or <span>II</span> patients scheduled to undergo cesarean sections under subarachnoid anesthesia combined with morphine 0.2<!--> <!-->mg were randomized to receive, after the child's birth, metoclopramide 10<!--> <!-->mg (Group <span>I-</span>control), droperidol 2.5<!--> <!-->mg (Group <span>II</span>) or ondansetron 8<!--> <!-->mg (Group <span>III</span>). Postoperatively, the patients were assessed for pruritus (absent, mild, moderate or severe) or other side effects by blinded investigators. Patients were also blinded to their group allocation. The tendency to present more severe forms of pruritus was compared between groups. NNT was also determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients assigned to receive droperidol (proportional odds ratio: 0.45 [95% confidence interval 0.23-0.88]) reported less pruritus than those who received metoclopramide. Ondansetron effect was similar to metoclopramide (proportional odds ratio: 0.95 [95% confidence interval 0.49-1.83]). The NNT for droperidol and ondansetron was 4.0 and 14.7, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Ondansetron does not inhibit subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"volume\":\"65 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 244-248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.11.006\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景与目的昂丹西琼对蛛网膜下腔吗啡引起的瘙痒的预防作用尚存争议,而有证据表明氟哌啶醇可以预防瘙痒。本研究的目的是比较哌啶醇和昂丹西琼对蛛网膜下腔吗啡引起的瘙痒的影响。方法180例ASA I级或II级患者拟行蛛网膜下腔麻醉联合吗啡0.2 mg剖宫产术,分娩后随机给予甲氧氯普胺10 mg(对照组)、哌啶醇2.5 mg(组)或昂丹司琼8 mg(组)。术后采用盲法评估患者瘙痒(无、轻、中、重度)及其他不良反应。患者也不知道他们的分组分配。比较两组之间出现更严重形式的瘙痒的趋势。NNT也被确定。结果接受哌啶醇治疗的患者(比例优势比:0.45[95%可信区间0.23-0.88])瘙痒症状少于接受甲氧氯普胺治疗的患者。昂丹司琼效应与甲氧氯普胺相似(比例优势比:0.95[95%可信区间0.49-1.83])。氟哌啶醇和昂丹司琼的NNT分别为4.0和14.7。结论sondansetron对蛛网膜下腔吗啡性瘙痒无抑制作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparación de los efectos profilácticos del droperidol y del ondansetrón sobre el prurito provocado por la morfina subaracnoidea

Background and objectives

The prophylactic effect of ondansetron on subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus is controversial, while evidence suggests that droperidol prevents pruritus. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of droperidol and ondansetron on subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus.

Methods

One hundred eighty patients ASA I or II patients scheduled to undergo cesarean sections under subarachnoid anesthesia combined with morphine 0.2 mg were randomized to receive, after the child's birth, metoclopramide 10 mg (Group I-control), droperidol 2.5 mg (Group II) or ondansetron 8 mg (Group III). Postoperatively, the patients were assessed for pruritus (absent, mild, moderate or severe) or other side effects by blinded investigators. Patients were also blinded to their group allocation. The tendency to present more severe forms of pruritus was compared between groups. NNT was also determined.

Results

Patients assigned to receive droperidol (proportional odds ratio: 0.45 [95% confidence interval 0.23-0.88]) reported less pruritus than those who received metoclopramide. Ondansetron effect was similar to metoclopramide (proportional odds ratio: 0.95 [95% confidence interval 0.49-1.83]). The NNT for droperidol and ondansetron was 4.0 and 14.7, respectively.

Conclusions

Ondansetron does not inhibit subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信