超声引导下布比卡因腋窝阻断臂丛的最小有效浓度

Alexandre Takeda, Leonardo Henrique Cunha Ferraro, André Hosoi Rezende, Eduardo Jun Sadatsune, Luiz Fernando dos Reis Falcão, Maria Angela Tardelli
{"title":"超声引导下布比卡因腋窝阻断臂丛的最小有效浓度","authors":"Alexandre Takeda,&nbsp;Leonardo Henrique Cunha Ferraro,&nbsp;André Hosoi Rezende,&nbsp;Eduardo Jun Sadatsune,&nbsp;Luiz Fernando dos Reis Falcão,&nbsp;Maria Angela Tardelli","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The use of ultrasound in regional anesthesia allows reducing the dosis of local anesthetic used for peripheral nerve block. The present study was performed to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing hand surgery were recruited. To estimate the MEC90, a sequential up-down biased coin method of allocation was used. The bupivacaine dosis was 5<!--> <!-->mL for each nerve (radial, ulnar, median, and musculocutaneous). The initial concentration was 0.35%. This concentration was changed by 0.05% depending on the previous block: a blockade failure resulted in increased concentration for the next patient; in case of success, the next patient could receive or reduction (0.1 probability) or the same concentration (0.9 probability). Surgical anesthesia was defined as driving force<!--> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->2 according to the modified Bromage scale, lack of thermal sensitivity and response to pinprick. Postoperative analgesia was assessed in the recovery room with numeric pain scale and the amount of drugs used within 4<!--> <!-->h after the blockade.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MEC90 was 0.241% [R2: 0.978, confidence interval: 0.20-0.34%]. No successful block patient reported pain after 4<!--> <!-->h.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrated that ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block can be performed with the use of low concentration of local anesthetics, increasing the safety of the procedure. Further studies should be conducted to assess blockade duration at low concentrations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"65 3","pages":"Pages 163-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.11.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concentración mínima efectiva de bupivacaína para el bloqueo del plexo braquial vía axilar guiado por ecografía\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Takeda,&nbsp;Leonardo Henrique Cunha Ferraro,&nbsp;André Hosoi Rezende,&nbsp;Eduardo Jun Sadatsune,&nbsp;Luiz Fernando dos Reis Falcão,&nbsp;Maria Angela Tardelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The use of ultrasound in regional anesthesia allows reducing the dosis of local anesthetic used for peripheral nerve block. The present study was performed to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing hand surgery were recruited. To estimate the MEC90, a sequential up-down biased coin method of allocation was used. The bupivacaine dosis was 5<!--> <!-->mL for each nerve (radial, ulnar, median, and musculocutaneous). The initial concentration was 0.35%. This concentration was changed by 0.05% depending on the previous block: a blockade failure resulted in increased concentration for the next patient; in case of success, the next patient could receive or reduction (0.1 probability) or the same concentration (0.9 probability). Surgical anesthesia was defined as driving force<!--> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->2 according to the modified Bromage scale, lack of thermal sensitivity and response to pinprick. Postoperative analgesia was assessed in the recovery room with numeric pain scale and the amount of drugs used within 4<!--> <!-->h after the blockade.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MEC90 was 0.241% [R2: 0.978, confidence interval: 0.20-0.34%]. No successful block patient reported pain after 4<!--> <!-->h.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrated that ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block can be performed with the use of low concentration of local anesthetics, increasing the safety of the procedure. Further studies should be conducted to assess blockade duration at low concentrations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"volume\":\"65 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 163-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2013.11.004\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

超声在区域麻醉中的应用可以减少周围神经阻滞所用局麻药的剂量。本研究旨在确定布比卡因用于腋窝臂丛神经阻滞的最低有效浓度(MEC90)。方法招募手部手术患者。为了估计MEC90,使用了顺序上下偏置硬币分配方法。布比卡因剂量为每条神经(桡神经、尺神经、正中神经和肌皮神经)5ml。初始浓度为0.35%。这一浓度根据前一个阻断而变化0.05%:阻断失败导致下一个患者的浓度增加;如果成功,下一个患者可以接受或减少(0.1的概率)或相同的浓度(0.9的概率)。根据改良Bromage评分、缺乏热敏性和针刺反应,将手术麻醉定义为驱动力≤2。术后镇痛在恢复室用数值疼痛量表和阻断后4 h内的用药量进行评估。结果smec90为0.241% [R2: 0.978,置信区间:0.20 ~ 0.34%]。结论超声引导腋窝臂丛神经阻滞可以在低浓度局麻药的情况下进行,提高了手术的安全性。应该进行进一步的研究来评估低浓度下的阻断持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concentración mínima efectiva de bupivacaína para el bloqueo del plexo braquial vía axilar guiado por ecografía

Introduction

The use of ultrasound in regional anesthesia allows reducing the dosis of local anesthetic used for peripheral nerve block. The present study was performed to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block.

Methods

Patients undergoing hand surgery were recruited. To estimate the MEC90, a sequential up-down biased coin method of allocation was used. The bupivacaine dosis was 5 mL for each nerve (radial, ulnar, median, and musculocutaneous). The initial concentration was 0.35%. This concentration was changed by 0.05% depending on the previous block: a blockade failure resulted in increased concentration for the next patient; in case of success, the next patient could receive or reduction (0.1 probability) or the same concentration (0.9 probability). Surgical anesthesia was defined as driving force  2 according to the modified Bromage scale, lack of thermal sensitivity and response to pinprick. Postoperative analgesia was assessed in the recovery room with numeric pain scale and the amount of drugs used within 4 h after the blockade.

Results

MEC90 was 0.241% [R2: 0.978, confidence interval: 0.20-0.34%]. No successful block patient reported pain after 4 h.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block can be performed with the use of low concentration of local anesthetics, increasing the safety of the procedure. Further studies should be conducted to assess blockade duration at low concentrations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信