唐纳德Schön，赫伯特西蒙和人工科学

IF 3.2 1区工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING

Design Studies Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.destud.2008.09.001

Jude Chua Soo Meng

{"title":"唐纳德Schön，赫伯特西蒙和人工科学","authors":"Jude Chua Soo Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.destud.2008.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, I examine Schön's criticism of Herbert Simon's instrumentalist theory of design and conclude that Schön's evaluation of Simon's theory of design, based on the first edition of <em>The Sciences of the Artificial</em>, overlooks many open-ended constructivist trajectories. By exploring later editions of <em>The Sciences of the Artificial</em>, the hope is to correct the misconception that Simon's substantive theory of design had very little to contribute to research studies in designerly ways of knowing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50593,"journal":{"name":"Design Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"Pages 60-68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.destud.2008.09.001","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donald Schön, Herbert Simon and The Sciences of the Artificial\",\"authors\":\"Jude Chua Soo Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.destud.2008.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, I examine Schön's criticism of Herbert Simon's instrumentalist theory of design and conclude that Schön's evaluation of Simon's theory of design, based on the first edition of <em>The Sciences of the Artificial</em>, overlooks many open-ended constructivist trajectories. By exploring later editions of <em>The Sciences of the Artificial</em>, the hope is to correct the misconception that Simon's substantive theory of design had very little to contribute to research studies in designerly ways of knowing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Studies\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.destud.2008.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X08000811\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Studies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X08000811","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 53

摘要

在本文中，我研究了Schön对赫伯特·西蒙的工具主义设计理论的批评，并得出结论:Schön对西蒙设计理论的评价基于《人工科学》的第一版，忽视了许多开放式的构成主义轨迹。通过探索《人工科学》的后期版本，我们希望纠正一种误解，即西蒙的实质性设计理论对设计师式的认知方式的研究几乎没有贡献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Donald Schön, Herbert Simon and The Sciences of the Artificial

In this paper, I examine Schön's criticism of Herbert Simon's instrumentalist theory of design and conclude that Schön's evaluation of Simon's theory of design, based on the first edition of The Sciences of the Artificial, overlooks many open-ended constructivist trajectories. By exploring later editions of The Sciences of the Artificial, the hope is to correct the misconception that Simon's substantive theory of design had very little to contribute to research studies in designerly ways of knowing.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Design Studies 工程技术-工程：制造

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

20.00%

发文量

审稿时长

40 days

期刊介绍： Design Studies is a leading international academic journal focused on developing understanding of design processes. It studies design activity across all domains of application, including engineering and product design, architectural and urban design, computer artefacts and systems design. It therefore provides an interdisciplinary forum for the analysis, development and discussion of fundamental aspects of design activity, from cognition and methodology to values and philosophy. Design Studies publishes work that is concerned with the process of designing, and is relevant to a broad audience of researchers, teachers and practitioners. We welcome original, scientific and scholarly research papers reporting studies concerned with the process of designing in all its many fields, or furthering the development and application of new knowledge relating to design process. Papers should be written to be intelligible and pertinent to a wide range of readership across different design domains. To be relevant for this journal, a paper has to offer something that gives new insight into or knowledge about the design process, or assists new development of the processes of designing.