同质和数字接近结扎法检测艰难梭菌毒素A和B

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Harvinder S. Dhillon , Gemma Johnson , Mark Shannon , Christina Greenwood , Doug Roberts , Stephen Bustin
{"title":"同质和数字接近结扎法检测艰难梭菌毒素A和B","authors":"Harvinder S. Dhillon ,&nbsp;Gemma Johnson ,&nbsp;Mark Shannon ,&nbsp;Christina Greenwood ,&nbsp;Doug Roberts ,&nbsp;Stephen Bustin","doi":"10.1016/j.bdq.2016.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The proximity ligation assay (PLA) detects proteins via their interaction with pairs of proximity probes, which are antibodies coupled to noncomplementary DNA oligonucleotides. The binding of both proximity probes to their epitopes on the target protein brings the oligonucleotides together, allowing them to be bridged by a third oligonucleotide with complementarity to the other two. This enables their ligation and the detection of the resulting amplicon by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), which acts as a surrogate marker for the protein of interest. Hence PLA has potential as a clinically relevant diagnostic tool for the detection of pathogens where nucleic acid based tests are inconclusive proof of infection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We prepared monoclonal and polyclonal proximity probes targeting <em><em>Clostridium</em> difficile</em> toxins A (TcdA) and B (TcdB) and used hydrolysis probe-based qPCR and digital PCR (dPCR) assays to detect antibody/antigen interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The performance of the PLA assays was antibody-dependent but both TcdA and TcdB assays were more sensitive than comparable ELISAs in either single- or dualplex formats. Both PLAs could be performed using single monoclonal antibodies coupled to different oligonucleotides. Finally, we used dPCR to demonstrate its potential for accurate and reliable quantification of TcdA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PLA with either qPCR or dPCR readout have potential as new diagnostic applications for the detection of pathogens where nucleic acid based tests do not indicate viability or expression of toxins. Importantly, since it is not always necessary to use two different antibodies, the pool of potential antibodies useful for PLA diagnostic assays is usefully enhanced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38073,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 2-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bdq.2016.06.003","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homogeneous and digital proximity ligation assays for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B\",\"authors\":\"Harvinder S. Dhillon ,&nbsp;Gemma Johnson ,&nbsp;Mark Shannon ,&nbsp;Christina Greenwood ,&nbsp;Doug Roberts ,&nbsp;Stephen Bustin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bdq.2016.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The proximity ligation assay (PLA) detects proteins via their interaction with pairs of proximity probes, which are antibodies coupled to noncomplementary DNA oligonucleotides. The binding of both proximity probes to their epitopes on the target protein brings the oligonucleotides together, allowing them to be bridged by a third oligonucleotide with complementarity to the other two. This enables their ligation and the detection of the resulting amplicon by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), which acts as a surrogate marker for the protein of interest. Hence PLA has potential as a clinically relevant diagnostic tool for the detection of pathogens where nucleic acid based tests are inconclusive proof of infection.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We prepared monoclonal and polyclonal proximity probes targeting <em><em>Clostridium</em> difficile</em> toxins A (TcdA) and B (TcdB) and used hydrolysis probe-based qPCR and digital PCR (dPCR) assays to detect antibody/antigen interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The performance of the PLA assays was antibody-dependent but both TcdA and TcdB assays were more sensitive than comparable ELISAs in either single- or dualplex formats. Both PLAs could be performed using single monoclonal antibodies coupled to different oligonucleotides. Finally, we used dPCR to demonstrate its potential for accurate and reliable quantification of TcdA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PLA with either qPCR or dPCR readout have potential as new diagnostic applications for the detection of pathogens where nucleic acid based tests do not indicate viability or expression of toxins. Importantly, since it is not always necessary to use two different antibodies, the pool of potential antibodies useful for PLA diagnostic assays is usefully enhanced.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 2-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bdq.2016.06.003\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475351630016X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475351630016X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

近距离连接试验(PLA)通过蛋白质与近距离探针对的相互作用来检测蛋白质,近距离探针是偶联到非互补DNA寡核苷酸的抗体。两个近距离探针与目标蛋白上的表位结合,将寡核苷酸聚集在一起,允许它们被与其他两个互补的第三个寡核苷酸桥接。这使得它们能够连接并通过实时定量PCR (qPCR)检测产生的扩增子,qPCR作为感兴趣蛋白质的替代标记物。因此,PLA有潜力作为一种临床相关的诊断工具,用于检测基于核酸的检测不能确定感染的病原体。方法制备艰难梭菌毒素A (TcdA)和B (TcdB)的单克隆和多克隆接近探针,采用基于水解探针的qPCR和数字PCR (dPCR)检测抗体/抗原相互作用。结果PLA检测的性能是抗体依赖的,但TcdA和TcdB检测在单或双双格式下都比同类elisa更敏感。这两种pla都可以使用偶联到不同寡核苷酸的单克隆抗体进行检测。最后,我们使用dPCR来证明其准确可靠的TcdA定量的潜力。结论基于qPCR或dPCR的spla在检测核酸检测不能显示毒素活性或表达的病原体方面具有新的诊断应用潜力。重要的是,由于并不总是需要使用两种不同的抗体,因此对PLA诊断分析有用的潜在抗体池有效地增强了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Homogeneous and digital proximity ligation assays for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B

Background

The proximity ligation assay (PLA) detects proteins via their interaction with pairs of proximity probes, which are antibodies coupled to noncomplementary DNA oligonucleotides. The binding of both proximity probes to their epitopes on the target protein brings the oligonucleotides together, allowing them to be bridged by a third oligonucleotide with complementarity to the other two. This enables their ligation and the detection of the resulting amplicon by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), which acts as a surrogate marker for the protein of interest. Hence PLA has potential as a clinically relevant diagnostic tool for the detection of pathogens where nucleic acid based tests are inconclusive proof of infection.

Methods

We prepared monoclonal and polyclonal proximity probes targeting Clostridium difficile toxins A (TcdA) and B (TcdB) and used hydrolysis probe-based qPCR and digital PCR (dPCR) assays to detect antibody/antigen interactions.

Results

The performance of the PLA assays was antibody-dependent but both TcdA and TcdB assays were more sensitive than comparable ELISAs in either single- or dualplex formats. Both PLAs could be performed using single monoclonal antibodies coupled to different oligonucleotides. Finally, we used dPCR to demonstrate its potential for accurate and reliable quantification of TcdA.

Conclusions

PLA with either qPCR or dPCR readout have potential as new diagnostic applications for the detection of pathogens where nucleic acid based tests do not indicate viability or expression of toxins. Importantly, since it is not always necessary to use two different antibodies, the pool of potential antibodies useful for PLA diagnostic assays is usefully enhanced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信