主动脉-髂破裂的血管内修复

Anita Quintas , Hugo Valentim , João Albuquerque e Castro, Frederico Bastos Gonçalves, Rodolfo Abreu, Hugo Rodrigues, Nelson Oliveira, Gonçalo Rodrigues, Rita Ferreira, Nelson Camacho, Maria Emília Ferreira, Luís Mota Capitão
{"title":"主动脉-髂破裂的血管内修复","authors":"Anita Quintas ,&nbsp;Hugo Valentim ,&nbsp;João Albuquerque e Castro,&nbsp;Frederico Bastos Gonçalves,&nbsp;Rodolfo Abreu,&nbsp;Hugo Rodrigues,&nbsp;Nelson Oliveira,&nbsp;Gonçalo Rodrigues,&nbsp;Rita Ferreira,&nbsp;Nelson Camacho,&nbsp;Maria Emília Ferreira,&nbsp;Luís Mota Capitão","doi":"10.1016/j.ancv.2016.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Rupture has a negative impact on abdominal aortic or iliac pathology. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an established treatment in the elective setting which has increasingly been applied in urgent patients and may be associated with a decrease in perioperative mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Our primary outcome was perioperative/early mortality. Secondary outcomes include perioperative hemodynamics and procedure‐related complications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospectively maintained single center database was retrospectively enquired. Patients who underwent rEVAR between March 2008 and March 2014 were included. Rupture was defined as the presence of a retroperitoneal hematoma or extraversion of contrast on a CTA. Although there's no institutional capacity to offer EVAR to all ruptured aneurysms, it is given preference to endovascular repair over open surgery in patients with suitable aortic anatomy for EVAR.</p><p>Demographic, perioperative hemodynamics and laboratorial data were assessed. Primary outcome was perioperative/early mortality. Secondary outcomes include procedure‐related and systemic complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty‐nine patients were included, 43 of whom (88%) were males and mean age was 73.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10,61 years (range 47 to 90).</p><p>Thirty‐five patients presented rAAA (72%) and 9 ruptured iliac aneurysms (18%). Mean aneurysm diameter was 7.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.7<!--> <!-->cm. Other indications for rEVAR were spontaneous/iatrogenic aortic rupture (6%; n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3), late aneurysm rupture following EVAR (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1) and a case of an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm. Deployed endograft configuration was aortic bi‐iliac in 26 cases (53%), aortic mono‐iliac in 18 (37%) and embolization and endovascular exclusion with iliac branch (10%). Deployed devices were Endurant Medtronic<sup>®</sup> in 59%, Excluder Gore<sup>®</sup> in 12%, Zenith Cook<sup>®</sup> in 22%, Excluder C3 Gore<sup>®</sup> in 5%, e Talent Medtronic<sup>®</sup> in 2%. 32% were treated under local anesthesia. The 30 dias/intrahospitalar mortality rate was 26.5%, which progressively decreased during the study period. The 30‐day complication rate was local in 20.4%, systemic in 53%. Abdominal compartment syndrome occurred in 10 cases (20.4%), and was found to be a negative prognostic factor. Median hospitalization duration was 7 days (0‐92) and median stay in the intensive care unit was 2 days (0‐65).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EVAR is a valid treatment in the urgent setting for patients with abdominal aortic or iliac rupture. Our results are comparable to the randomized controlled studies</p></div>","PeriodicalId":30341,"journal":{"name":"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular","volume":"12 4","pages":"Pages 234-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancv.2016.04.006","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reparação endovascular na rutura aorto‐ilíaca\",\"authors\":\"Anita Quintas ,&nbsp;Hugo Valentim ,&nbsp;João Albuquerque e Castro,&nbsp;Frederico Bastos Gonçalves,&nbsp;Rodolfo Abreu,&nbsp;Hugo Rodrigues,&nbsp;Nelson Oliveira,&nbsp;Gonçalo Rodrigues,&nbsp;Rita Ferreira,&nbsp;Nelson Camacho,&nbsp;Maria Emília Ferreira,&nbsp;Luís Mota Capitão\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ancv.2016.04.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Rupture has a negative impact on abdominal aortic or iliac pathology. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an established treatment in the elective setting which has increasingly been applied in urgent patients and may be associated with a decrease in perioperative mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Our primary outcome was perioperative/early mortality. Secondary outcomes include perioperative hemodynamics and procedure‐related complications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospectively maintained single center database was retrospectively enquired. Patients who underwent rEVAR between March 2008 and March 2014 were included. Rupture was defined as the presence of a retroperitoneal hematoma or extraversion of contrast on a CTA. Although there's no institutional capacity to offer EVAR to all ruptured aneurysms, it is given preference to endovascular repair over open surgery in patients with suitable aortic anatomy for EVAR.</p><p>Demographic, perioperative hemodynamics and laboratorial data were assessed. Primary outcome was perioperative/early mortality. Secondary outcomes include procedure‐related and systemic complications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty‐nine patients were included, 43 of whom (88%) were males and mean age was 73.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10,61 years (range 47 to 90).</p><p>Thirty‐five patients presented rAAA (72%) and 9 ruptured iliac aneurysms (18%). Mean aneurysm diameter was 7.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.7<!--> <!-->cm. Other indications for rEVAR were spontaneous/iatrogenic aortic rupture (6%; n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3), late aneurysm rupture following EVAR (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1) and a case of an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm. Deployed endograft configuration was aortic bi‐iliac in 26 cases (53%), aortic mono‐iliac in 18 (37%) and embolization and endovascular exclusion with iliac branch (10%). Deployed devices were Endurant Medtronic<sup>®</sup> in 59%, Excluder Gore<sup>®</sup> in 12%, Zenith Cook<sup>®</sup> in 22%, Excluder C3 Gore<sup>®</sup> in 5%, e Talent Medtronic<sup>®</sup> in 2%. 32% were treated under local anesthesia. The 30 dias/intrahospitalar mortality rate was 26.5%, which progressively decreased during the study period. The 30‐day complication rate was local in 20.4%, systemic in 53%. Abdominal compartment syndrome occurred in 10 cases (20.4%), and was found to be a negative prognostic factor. Median hospitalization duration was 7 days (0‐92) and median stay in the intensive care unit was 2 days (0‐65).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>EVAR is a valid treatment in the urgent setting for patients with abdominal aortic or iliac rupture. Our results are comparable to the randomized controlled studies</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 234-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancv.2016.04.006\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1646706X16300143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1646706X16300143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

破裂对腹主动脉或髂的病理有负面影响。血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)是一种成熟的选择性治疗方法,越来越多地应用于急诊患者,并可能与降低围手术期死亡率有关。目的:我们的主要结局是围手术期/早期死亡率。次要结局包括围手术期血流动力学和手术相关并发症。方法回顾性查询前瞻性维护的单中心数据库。纳入2008年3月至2014年3月期间接受rEVAR的患者。破裂被定义为在CTA上出现腹膜后血肿或造影剂外翻。虽然没有机构有能力为所有破裂的动脉瘤提供EVAR,但对于适合EVAR的主动脉解剖结构的患者,血管内修复优于开放手术。评估人口统计学、围手术期血流动力学和实验室数据。主要结局为围手术期/早期死亡率。次要结局包括手术相关并发症和全身并发症。结果纳入49例患者,其中男性43例(88%),平均年龄73.7±10.61岁(47 ~ 90岁)。35例患者出现rAAA(72%)和9例髂动脉瘤破裂(18%)。平均动脉瘤直径7.6±1.7 cm。rEVAR的其他适应症是自发性/医源性主动脉破裂(6%;n = 3), EVAR后晚期动脉瘤破裂(n = 1)和吻合口假性动脉瘤1例。部署的内移植物配置为双髂主动脉26例(53%),单髂主动脉18例(37%),髂分支栓塞和血管内排除(10%)。部署的设备是endurance Medtronic®(59%)、Excluder Gore®(12%)、Zenith Cook®(22%)、Excluder C3 Gore®(5%)和Talent Medtronic®(2%)。32%采用局麻治疗。30日/院内死亡率为26.5%,在研究期间逐渐下降。30天并发症发生率为局部20.4%,全身性53%。10例(20.4%)发生腹膜间室综合征,为不良预后因素。中位住院时间为7天(0 ~ 92天),在重症监护病房的中位住院时间为2天(0 ~ 65天)。结论evar是治疗腹主动脉或髂动脉破裂的一种有效方法。我们的结果与随机对照研究相当
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reparação endovascular na rutura aorto‐ilíaca

Introduction

Rupture has a negative impact on abdominal aortic or iliac pathology. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an established treatment in the elective setting which has increasingly been applied in urgent patients and may be associated with a decrease in perioperative mortality.

Objectives

Our primary outcome was perioperative/early mortality. Secondary outcomes include perioperative hemodynamics and procedure‐related complications.

Methods

A prospectively maintained single center database was retrospectively enquired. Patients who underwent rEVAR between March 2008 and March 2014 were included. Rupture was defined as the presence of a retroperitoneal hematoma or extraversion of contrast on a CTA. Although there's no institutional capacity to offer EVAR to all ruptured aneurysms, it is given preference to endovascular repair over open surgery in patients with suitable aortic anatomy for EVAR.

Demographic, perioperative hemodynamics and laboratorial data were assessed. Primary outcome was perioperative/early mortality. Secondary outcomes include procedure‐related and systemic complications.

Results

Forty‐nine patients were included, 43 of whom (88%) were males and mean age was 73.7 ± 10,61 years (range 47 to 90).

Thirty‐five patients presented rAAA (72%) and 9 ruptured iliac aneurysms (18%). Mean aneurysm diameter was 7.6 ± 1.7 cm. Other indications for rEVAR were spontaneous/iatrogenic aortic rupture (6%; n = 3), late aneurysm rupture following EVAR (n = 1) and a case of an anastomotic pseudoaneurysm. Deployed endograft configuration was aortic bi‐iliac in 26 cases (53%), aortic mono‐iliac in 18 (37%) and embolization and endovascular exclusion with iliac branch (10%). Deployed devices were Endurant Medtronic® in 59%, Excluder Gore® in 12%, Zenith Cook® in 22%, Excluder C3 Gore® in 5%, e Talent Medtronic® in 2%. 32% were treated under local anesthesia. The 30 dias/intrahospitalar mortality rate was 26.5%, which progressively decreased during the study period. The 30‐day complication rate was local in 20.4%, systemic in 53%. Abdominal compartment syndrome occurred in 10 cases (20.4%), and was found to be a negative prognostic factor. Median hospitalization duration was 7 days (0‐92) and median stay in the intensive care unit was 2 days (0‐65).

Conclusion

EVAR is a valid treatment in the urgent setting for patients with abdominal aortic or iliac rupture. Our results are comparable to the randomized controlled studies

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信