Ivone Silva , Andreia Teixeira , José Oliveira , Rui Almeida , Carlos Vasconcelos
{"title":"雷诺现象中的周围血管病变:血管疾病的生物标志物","authors":"Ivone Silva , Andreia Teixeira , José Oliveira , Rui Almeida , Carlos Vasconcelos","doi":"10.1016/j.ancv.2016.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Introduction: Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a well-defined clinical syndrome. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the most frequent associated disease to RP (96%). The aim of this study was to assess the differences between primary RP (PRP) and secondary RP (SRP) regarding macrovascular disease parameters, endothelial dysfunction and angiogenesis biomarkers.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), endothelin-1 (ET-1), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), endoglin and endostatin were analyzed in a cohort study of 32 PRP patients and 77 SRP all with SSc. 38 of the SRP SSc-associated patients had severe digital ulcer (DU).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with PRP had significantly longer history of RP compared to SRP SSc-sssociated patients (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <em>0.028</em>).</p><p>FMD was significantly lower in SRP patients 10.85<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.0% (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), more evidenced in SRP SSc-associated DU patients 5.34<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.49 (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). ET-1 plasma levels were significantly increased in both PRP 7.53 (0.16–11.73) and SRP patients 11.85 (7.42–17.23) (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). Significant increased serum levels of ADMA 0.52 (0.45–0.63)<!--> <!-->μmol/L (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001) and endoglin 3.01 (1.46–7.02)<!--> <!-->mg/ml (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <em>0.001</em>) were found in the SRP SSc-associated group with DU. VEGF was significantly decreased in the DU group 245.06 (158.68–347.33)<!--> <!-->pg/ml compared to PRP 438.50 (269.26-854.00)<!--> <!-->pg/ml and SRP naïve–DU patients 290 (166.71–361.78)<!--> <!-->pg/ml patients (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). No significant differences were found between groups regarding endostatin (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <em>0.118</em>)<em>.</em></p><p>Comparing PRP and SRP SSc-associated patients without DU no statistically significant difference regarding FMD, ET-1, ADMA, VEGF, plasma levels were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Overproduction of ET-1 and VEGF is present in PRP patients. Macrovascular disease and an impaired response to shear stress are more characteristic of SRP with a grater expression in patients with peripheral ischemic lesions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":30341,"journal":{"name":"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular","volume":"12 2","pages":"Pages 77-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancv.2016.02.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peripheral vasculopathy in Raynaud phenomenon: Vascular disease biomarkers\",\"authors\":\"Ivone Silva , Andreia Teixeira , José Oliveira , Rui Almeida , Carlos Vasconcelos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ancv.2016.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Introduction: Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a well-defined clinical syndrome. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the most frequent associated disease to RP (96%). The aim of this study was to assess the differences between primary RP (PRP) and secondary RP (SRP) regarding macrovascular disease parameters, endothelial dysfunction and angiogenesis biomarkers.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), endothelin-1 (ET-1), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), endoglin and endostatin were analyzed in a cohort study of 32 PRP patients and 77 SRP all with SSc. 38 of the SRP SSc-associated patients had severe digital ulcer (DU).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with PRP had significantly longer history of RP compared to SRP SSc-sssociated patients (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <em>0.028</em>).</p><p>FMD was significantly lower in SRP patients 10.85<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->11.0% (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001), more evidenced in SRP SSc-associated DU patients 5.34<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7.49 (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). ET-1 plasma levels were significantly increased in both PRP 7.53 (0.16–11.73) and SRP patients 11.85 (7.42–17.23) (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). Significant increased serum levels of ADMA 0.52 (0.45–0.63)<!--> <!-->μmol/L (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001) and endoglin 3.01 (1.46–7.02)<!--> <!-->mg/ml (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <em>0.001</em>) were found in the SRP SSc-associated group with DU. VEGF was significantly decreased in the DU group 245.06 (158.68–347.33)<!--> <!-->pg/ml compared to PRP 438.50 (269.26-854.00)<!--> <!-->pg/ml and SRP naïve–DU patients 290 (166.71–361.78)<!--> <!-->pg/ml patients (<em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). No significant differences were found between groups regarding endostatin (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <em>0.118</em>)<em>.</em></p><p>Comparing PRP and SRP SSc-associated patients without DU no statistically significant difference regarding FMD, ET-1, ADMA, VEGF, plasma levels were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Overproduction of ET-1 and VEGF is present in PRP patients. Macrovascular disease and an impaired response to shear stress are more characteristic of SRP with a grater expression in patients with peripheral ischemic lesions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 77-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancv.2016.02.004\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1646706X16300052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1646706X16300052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peripheral vasculopathy in Raynaud phenomenon: Vascular disease biomarkers
Background
Introduction: Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is a well-defined clinical syndrome. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the most frequent associated disease to RP (96%). The aim of this study was to assess the differences between primary RP (PRP) and secondary RP (SRP) regarding macrovascular disease parameters, endothelial dysfunction and angiogenesis biomarkers.
Materials and methods
Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), endothelin-1 (ET-1), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), endoglin and endostatin were analyzed in a cohort study of 32 PRP patients and 77 SRP all with SSc. 38 of the SRP SSc-associated patients had severe digital ulcer (DU).
Results
Patients with PRP had significantly longer history of RP compared to SRP SSc-sssociated patients (p = 0.028).
FMD was significantly lower in SRP patients 10.85 ± 11.0% (p < 0.001), more evidenced in SRP SSc-associated DU patients 5.34 ± 7.49 (p < 0.001). ET-1 plasma levels were significantly increased in both PRP 7.53 (0.16–11.73) and SRP patients 11.85 (7.42–17.23) (p < 0.001). Significant increased serum levels of ADMA 0.52 (0.45–0.63) μmol/L (p < 0.001) and endoglin 3.01 (1.46–7.02) mg/ml (p < 0.001) were found in the SRP SSc-associated group with DU. VEGF was significantly decreased in the DU group 245.06 (158.68–347.33) pg/ml compared to PRP 438.50 (269.26-854.00) pg/ml and SRP naïve–DU patients 290 (166.71–361.78) pg/ml patients (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between groups regarding endostatin (p = 0.118).
Comparing PRP and SRP SSc-associated patients without DU no statistically significant difference regarding FMD, ET-1, ADMA, VEGF, plasma levels were observed.
Conclusion
Overproduction of ET-1 and VEGF is present in PRP patients. Macrovascular disease and an impaired response to shear stress are more characteristic of SRP with a grater expression in patients with peripheral ischemic lesions.