评估贝伐单抗治疗非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的化疗策略:一项多机构观察性研究

Masayoshi Higashiguchi , Takashi Kijima , Osamu Morimura , Akio Osa , Hidekazu Suzuki , Takako Inoue , Hiroyuki Kagawa , Kiyonobu Ueno , Tomonori Hirashima , Toru Kumagai , Fumio Imamura , Masahide Mori , Yoshiro Tanio , Ichiro Kawase
{"title":"评估贝伐单抗治疗非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的化疗策略:一项多机构观察性研究","authors":"Masayoshi Higashiguchi ,&nbsp;Takashi Kijima ,&nbsp;Osamu Morimura ,&nbsp;Akio Osa ,&nbsp;Hidekazu Suzuki ,&nbsp;Takako Inoue ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kagawa ,&nbsp;Kiyonobu Ueno ,&nbsp;Tomonori Hirashima ,&nbsp;Toru Kumagai ,&nbsp;Fumio Imamura ,&nbsp;Masahide Mori ,&nbsp;Yoshiro Tanio ,&nbsp;Ichiro Kawase","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrc.2015.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Micro-abstract</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed 162 patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab (BEV); 127 patients without driver oncogenes, 17 patients with <em>EGFR</em> major mutations, 12 patients with <em>ALK</em> rearrangements, 4 patients with <em>EGFR</em> minor mutations and 2 patients with rare types of histology.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>BEV has been approved for treatment of non-squamous NSCLC and is authenticated as one of the key drugs in the treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous NSCLC who underwent chemotherapy with BEV in first-line setting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 162 patients who underwent chemotherapy combined with BEV as first-line treatment, the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 23.5 months and 6.8 months, respectively. The PFS did not differ significantly by the presence of driver oncogenes. In patients without driver oncogenes, more patients who received carboplatin plus pemetrexed with BEV could complete at least 4 cycles of induction therapy and more of these patients proceeded to maintenance therapy than those who received carboplatin plus paclitaxel with BEV, which resulted in better outcome associated with carboplatin plus pemetrexed with BEV. Continuation of BEV beyond first progression did not show any survival benefit. In <em>EGFR</em> mutation-positive patients, the order of BEV-containing regimen and TKI did not influence on OS. None of 18 patients with brain metastases detected at diagnosis developed intracranial hemorrhage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PFS of first-line chemotherapy using BEV was not influenced by the existence of driver oncogenes. In patients without driver mutations in real clinical practice, as the first-line partner regimen with BEV, carboplatin plus pemetrexed may be more feasible as compared to carboplatin plus paclitaxel. BEV use beyond first progression did not deliver significant survival benefit. BEV was safe for brain metastases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90461,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctrc.2015.11.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of chemotherapy strategy using bevacizumab for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world setting: A multi-institutional observational study\",\"authors\":\"Masayoshi Higashiguchi ,&nbsp;Takashi Kijima ,&nbsp;Osamu Morimura ,&nbsp;Akio Osa ,&nbsp;Hidekazu Suzuki ,&nbsp;Takako Inoue ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kagawa ,&nbsp;Kiyonobu Ueno ,&nbsp;Tomonori Hirashima ,&nbsp;Toru Kumagai ,&nbsp;Fumio Imamura ,&nbsp;Masahide Mori ,&nbsp;Yoshiro Tanio ,&nbsp;Ichiro Kawase\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrc.2015.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Micro-abstract</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed 162 patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab (BEV); 127 patients without driver oncogenes, 17 patients with <em>EGFR</em> major mutations, 12 patients with <em>ALK</em> rearrangements, 4 patients with <em>EGFR</em> minor mutations and 2 patients with rare types of histology.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>BEV has been approved for treatment of non-squamous NSCLC and is authenticated as one of the key drugs in the treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous NSCLC who underwent chemotherapy with BEV in first-line setting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In 162 patients who underwent chemotherapy combined with BEV as first-line treatment, the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 23.5 months and 6.8 months, respectively. The PFS did not differ significantly by the presence of driver oncogenes. In patients without driver oncogenes, more patients who received carboplatin plus pemetrexed with BEV could complete at least 4 cycles of induction therapy and more of these patients proceeded to maintenance therapy than those who received carboplatin plus paclitaxel with BEV, which resulted in better outcome associated with carboplatin plus pemetrexed with BEV. Continuation of BEV beyond first progression did not show any survival benefit. In <em>EGFR</em> mutation-positive patients, the order of BEV-containing regimen and TKI did not influence on OS. None of 18 patients with brain metastases detected at diagnosis developed intracranial hemorrhage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PFS of first-line chemotherapy using BEV was not influenced by the existence of driver oncogenes. In patients without driver mutations in real clinical practice, as the first-line partner regimen with BEV, carboplatin plus pemetrexed may be more feasible as compared to carboplatin plus paclitaxel. BEV use beyond first progression did not deliver significant survival benefit. BEV was safe for brain metastases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctrc.2015.11.004\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213089615300281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213089615300281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们回顾性分析了162例接受贝伐单抗(BEV)一线化疗的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者;无驱动癌基因127例,EGFR大突变17例,ALK重排12例,EGFR小突变4例,组织学类型罕见2例。bev已被批准用于非鳞状NSCLC的治疗,是晚期非鳞状NSCLC治疗的关键药物之一。患者和方法我们回顾性分析在一线接受BEV化疗的IIIB/IV期非鳞状NSCLC患者。结果162例接受化疗联合BEV一线治疗的患者,中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为23.5个月和6.8个月。驱动癌基因的存在对PFS没有显著影响。在没有驱动癌基因的患者中,接受卡铂+培美曲塞联合BEV治疗的患者比接受卡铂+紫杉醇联合BEV治疗的患者能够完成至少4个周期的诱导治疗,并且这些患者中有更多的患者进行了维持治疗,这导致卡铂+培美曲塞联合BEV治疗的结果更好。在第一次进展之后继续使用BEV并没有显示出任何生存益处。在EGFR突变阳性患者中,含bev方案的顺序和TKI对OS没有影响。18例确诊为脑转移瘤的患者均无颅内出血。结论BEV一线化疗的spfs不受驱动癌基因存在的影响。在实际临床实践中没有驱动突变的患者中,作为BEV的一线合作方案,卡铂+培美曲塞可能比卡铂+紫杉醇更可行。在第一次进展之后使用BEV并没有带来显著的生存益处。BEV对脑转移瘤是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of chemotherapy strategy using bevacizumab for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world setting: A multi-institutional observational study

Micro-abstract

We retrospectively analyzed 162 patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab (BEV); 127 patients without driver oncogenes, 17 patients with EGFR major mutations, 12 patients with ALK rearrangements, 4 patients with EGFR minor mutations and 2 patients with rare types of histology.

Background

BEV has been approved for treatment of non-squamous NSCLC and is authenticated as one of the key drugs in the treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous NSCLC who underwent chemotherapy with BEV in first-line setting.

Results

In 162 patients who underwent chemotherapy combined with BEV as first-line treatment, the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 23.5 months and 6.8 months, respectively. The PFS did not differ significantly by the presence of driver oncogenes. In patients without driver oncogenes, more patients who received carboplatin plus pemetrexed with BEV could complete at least 4 cycles of induction therapy and more of these patients proceeded to maintenance therapy than those who received carboplatin plus paclitaxel with BEV, which resulted in better outcome associated with carboplatin plus pemetrexed with BEV. Continuation of BEV beyond first progression did not show any survival benefit. In EGFR mutation-positive patients, the order of BEV-containing regimen and TKI did not influence on OS. None of 18 patients with brain metastases detected at diagnosis developed intracranial hemorrhage.

Conclusions

PFS of first-line chemotherapy using BEV was not influenced by the existence of driver oncogenes. In patients without driver mutations in real clinical practice, as the first-line partner regimen with BEV, carboplatin plus pemetrexed may be more feasible as compared to carboplatin plus paclitaxel. BEV use beyond first progression did not deliver significant survival benefit. BEV was safe for brain metastases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信