“框架”对风险承受能力的影响:财务规划师也不能幸免

Michael J. Roszkowski, Glenn E. Snelbecker
{"title":"“框架”对风险承受能力的影响:财务规划师也不能幸免","authors":"Michael J. Roszkowski,&nbsp;Glenn E. Snelbecker","doi":"10.1016/0090-5720(90)90029-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prospect theory suggests that describing the objective risk inherent in a situation in terms of how much can be “gained” will lead to risk avoidance, whereas describing the same exact situation in terms of the potential “losses” to be suffered leads to risk-seeking behavior. This effect has been called “framing.” The present study investigated whether this bias occured among a professional group that deals with financial risk as part of their work. The results show that financial planners are not immune to the framing bias.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":85718,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of behavioral economics","volume":"19 3","pages":"Pages 237-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0090-5720(90)90029-7","citationCount":"119","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of “Framing” on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Roszkowski,&nbsp;Glenn E. Snelbecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0090-5720(90)90029-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Prospect theory suggests that describing the objective risk inherent in a situation in terms of how much can be “gained” will lead to risk avoidance, whereas describing the same exact situation in terms of the potential “losses” to be suffered leads to risk-seeking behavior. This effect has been called “framing.” The present study investigated whether this bias occured among a professional group that deals with financial risk as part of their work. The results show that financial planners are not immune to the framing bias.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of behavioral economics\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 237-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0090-5720(90)90029-7\",\"citationCount\":\"119\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of behavioral economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0090572090900297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of behavioral economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0090572090900297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 119

摘要

前景理论认为,用“获得”多少来描述一种情况中固有的客观风险会导致风险规避,而用可能遭受的“损失”来描述同样的情况会导致寻求风险的行为。这种效应被称为“框架效应”。本研究调查了这种偏见是否发生在处理金融风险作为其工作一部分的专业群体中。结果表明,理财规划师并非不受框架偏见的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of “Framing” on measures of risk tolerance: Financial planners are not immune

Prospect theory suggests that describing the objective risk inherent in a situation in terms of how much can be “gained” will lead to risk avoidance, whereas describing the same exact situation in terms of the potential “losses” to be suffered leads to risk-seeking behavior. This effect has been called “framing.” The present study investigated whether this bias occured among a professional group that deals with financial risk as part of their work. The results show that financial planners are not immune to the framing bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信