绩效线索对领导行为评价的影响:选择性信息可得性和概率反应偏差的作用

James R. Larson Jr., John H. Lingle, Mark M. Scerbo
{"title":"绩效线索对领导行为评价的影响:选择性信息可得性和概率反应偏差的作用","authors":"James R. Larson Jr.,&nbsp;John H. Lingle,&nbsp;Mark M. Scerbo","doi":"10.1016/0030-5073(84)90027-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research has demonstrated that performance cues can significantly influence raters' responses on leader-behavior rating questionnaires. The purpose of the present study was to explore the cognitive mechanisms that mediate this influence. Subjects watched a videotape of a problem-solving group and later rated the group leader's behavior. Perceptions of the group's performance were manipulated both before (preobservation) and after (postobservation) subjects watched the tape. Both manipulations affected the leader-behavior ratings. Analytic procedures borrowed from signal detection theory suggest that the preobservation performances cue effects were mediated by selective encoding of leader-behavior information in memory, while the postobservation effects were mediated by probabilistic response biases. Selective memory retrieval, on the other hand, did not seem to play a role. The implications of these results for developing strategies to overcome the confounding influence of performance cues on leader-behavior ratings are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76928,"journal":{"name":"Organizational behavior and human performance","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 323-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90027-8","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of performance cues on leader-behavior ratings: The role of selective information availability and probabilistic response bias\",\"authors\":\"James R. Larson Jr.,&nbsp;John H. Lingle,&nbsp;Mark M. Scerbo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0030-5073(84)90027-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previous research has demonstrated that performance cues can significantly influence raters' responses on leader-behavior rating questionnaires. The purpose of the present study was to explore the cognitive mechanisms that mediate this influence. Subjects watched a videotape of a problem-solving group and later rated the group leader's behavior. Perceptions of the group's performance were manipulated both before (preobservation) and after (postobservation) subjects watched the tape. Both manipulations affected the leader-behavior ratings. Analytic procedures borrowed from signal detection theory suggest that the preobservation performances cue effects were mediated by selective encoding of leader-behavior information in memory, while the postobservation effects were mediated by probabilistic response biases. Selective memory retrieval, on the other hand, did not seem to play a role. The implications of these results for developing strategies to overcome the confounding influence of performance cues on leader-behavior ratings are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organizational behavior and human performance\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 323-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90027-8\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organizational behavior and human performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507384900278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational behavior and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030507384900278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

以往的研究表明,绩效线索可以显著影响评分者对领导行为评分问卷的反应。本研究的目的是探讨调解这种影响的认知机制。研究对象观看了一个解决问题小组的录像带,然后对小组组长的行为进行打分。受试者在观看录像带之前(观察前)和之后(观察后)对小组表现的看法都进行了操纵。这两种方法都影响了对领导者行为的评价。借鉴信号检测理论的分析结果表明,观察前绩效提示效应是由记忆中领导者行为信息的选择性编码介导的,而观察后绩效提示效应是由概率反应偏差介导的。另一方面,选择性记忆检索似乎没有发挥作用。本文讨论了这些结果对制定策略以克服绩效线索对领导者行为评级的混淆影响的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of performance cues on leader-behavior ratings: The role of selective information availability and probabilistic response bias

Previous research has demonstrated that performance cues can significantly influence raters' responses on leader-behavior rating questionnaires. The purpose of the present study was to explore the cognitive mechanisms that mediate this influence. Subjects watched a videotape of a problem-solving group and later rated the group leader's behavior. Perceptions of the group's performance were manipulated both before (preobservation) and after (postobservation) subjects watched the tape. Both manipulations affected the leader-behavior ratings. Analytic procedures borrowed from signal detection theory suggest that the preobservation performances cue effects were mediated by selective encoding of leader-behavior information in memory, while the postobservation effects were mediated by probabilistic response biases. Selective memory retrieval, on the other hand, did not seem to play a role. The implications of these results for developing strategies to overcome the confounding influence of performance cues on leader-behavior ratings are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信